- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:45 pm to C
Because they decided it was better to run clock
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:45 pm to c on z
quote:Arizona
Who gets the ball back in the 2nd half?
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:45 pm to ljhog
the radio said LMJ could be hurt bad.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:45 pm to Augustus
quote:
Chip Kelly
Is a LOL machine.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:45 pm to Deactived
Arizona gets the ball to start the half. Taking the 3 points was the right thing to do.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:46 pm to Deactived
he is a tool....starts answering in the middle of a fricking question and gives dickhead remarks...TOOL!
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:47 pm to VABuckeye
No one said they should have gone for it, but stoops was more concerned with playing keep away then securing a td
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:48 pm to ornagestorm
Really? Sucks for Oregon, kid's a baller
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:48 pm to BilJ
Half of the previous page was calling for a fake. Would have been a stupid move.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:49 pm to BilJ
quote:
Because they decided it was better to run clock
How is that not what the trap play would do? unless you are saying they score a TD and leave more time on the clock.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:49 pm to VABuckeye
For the 2nd half, Oregon - 11.5 and 33 for the line.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:53 pm to Will Cover
you're playing Oregon, WC? Even with LMJ possibly out?
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:54 pm to Brageous
quote:
he is a tool....starts answering in the middle of a fricking question and gives dickhead remarks...TOOL!
I dislike him as much as anyone but noone gives any info out in those pre halftime interviews. Id be a dick too if someone was trying to interview me during a game
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:58 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
Win or lose..
Boise barely surviving a mediocre VaTech after early 17-0 lead..
Oregon lumping an overrated Pac-10, and struggling for huge chunks of the ASU, Cal, and Az games..
And TCU's "quality wins" over totally overrated Utah and then slightly underrated SD St..
I say fine, if the SEC is to have a team need vacate a natty title, or be ruled ineligible prior to it, then so be it..
Most of America's anti-SEC slant is begging for someone else to win the title, just for the sake of change, and/or to shut-up SEC fan. Let 2010 become 1984 BYU Redux, in letting Oreg-Boise or Oreg-TCU be that quarter century aberration, of fluky/arguable "soft champ".
While America knows in their heart that the SEC has at least three or four teams capable(probably favored Offshore and LV) of beating any of the left-coasters, especially with a month to prepare X&O-wise for the gadgetry.
Are Boise and TCU closing the gap on the AQs? Oh yeah. But, are they still underdogs of a "any given Saturday" angle to besting a SEC team in the BCSCG? Hell yes.
And over a decade later, with all of Phil Knight's money, with some close runs at natty hardware under Bellotti, is Kelly's Oregon still a finesse Pac-WAC-MtnW "offensive gadgeter" that still has a soft side towards Defense, and beating a powerhouse in a moneygame for hardware? I highly suspect so.
Boise barely surviving a mediocre VaTech after early 17-0 lead..
Oregon lumping an overrated Pac-10, and struggling for huge chunks of the ASU, Cal, and Az games..
And TCU's "quality wins" over totally overrated Utah and then slightly underrated SD St..
I say fine, if the SEC is to have a team need vacate a natty title, or be ruled ineligible prior to it, then so be it..
Most of America's anti-SEC slant is begging for someone else to win the title, just for the sake of change, and/or to shut-up SEC fan. Let 2010 become 1984 BYU Redux, in letting Oreg-Boise or Oreg-TCU be that quarter century aberration, of fluky/arguable "soft champ".
While America knows in their heart that the SEC has at least three or four teams capable(probably favored Offshore and LV) of beating any of the left-coasters, especially with a month to prepare X&O-wise for the gadgetry.
Are Boise and TCU closing the gap on the AQs? Oh yeah. But, are they still underdogs of a "any given Saturday" angle to besting a SEC team in the BCSCG? Hell yes.
And over a decade later, with all of Phil Knight's money, with some close runs at natty hardware under Bellotti, is Kelly's Oregon still a finesse Pac-WAC-MtnW "offensive gadgeter" that still has a soft side towards Defense, and beating a powerhouse in a moneygame for hardware? I highly suspect so.
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 11/26/10 at 7:59 pm to sgallo3
I would just like to say that for anybody that happened to see the university of arizona commercial. Don't be dissolutioned, their campus is a shithole. The only cool thing is they have/had a telescope mirror making facility under their stadium.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:00 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
English?
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:02 pm to Volmanac
I.E. They're soft..like yo' mama..or a 2009-2010 Vol Defense. 
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:05 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
After the LSU-Tennessee game you're going to call their defense soft? A lot of other teams have that right this year...but not LSU. 
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:05 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
Go Wildcats!!
Page 22 of 40
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News