- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACC just rigged the result
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:41 pm to Ancient Astronaut
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:41 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Did they have a better angle or something?
I was unsure after the first few replays but there was one when they zoomed it in and slowed it down where you could see the ball was not possessed on the way to the ground.
0
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to Geauxgurt
100% that was a scam!
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to TheRouxGuru
The initial call wasn’t necessarily a bad call. Player clearly had the ball and some control. The question was did he maintain it long enough. There was no clear evidence that he did not, and thus it should have stood.
The problem with this is that the entire point of replay was to correct calls where clear video evidence 100% proves the opposite happened. It’s not supposed to be a judgment call. If it becomes a judgment call then it stands. That is literally the rule.
Except when you want to steal the game for the league’s bell cow that given year.
The problem with this is that the entire point of replay was to correct calls where clear video evidence 100% proves the opposite happened. It’s not supposed to be a judgment call. If it becomes a judgment call then it stands. That is literally the rule.
Except when you want to steal the game for the league’s bell cow that given year.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to Geauxgurt
It wasn't a catch. That's the exact play replay is for - to correct a season defining incorrect 50/50 call made in the heat of the moment
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:43 pm to LSUJuicer
look how divided everyone is about the call, thats why you don’t overturn it
it was simply a business decision by Phillips and co on Tobacco Road
it was simply a business decision by Phillips and co on Tobacco Road
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:43 pm to TheRouxGuru
The instant 9 for VT hits the ground he is on his teammate who is laying out of bounds. It’s incomplete from that moment and nothing matters. 9 never once hits in bounds with the ball touching his hands
The possession or not is completely irrelevant
The possession or not is completely irrelevant
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:44 pm to SirWinston
quote:
It wasn't a catch. That's the exact play replay is for.
The replay didn’t show disputable evidence it wasn’t a catch. It was called a catch. Doesn’t add up.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:44 pm to Nitrogen
quote:
look how divided everyone is about the call
Almost no one thinks it was really a catch, just that you can't prove it wasn't.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:45 pm to TigerNlc
quote:Yes it did. It clearly shows #9 landing on his teammate who is out of bounds
The replay didn’t show disputable evidence it wasn’t a catch
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:45 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The instant 9 for VT hits the ground he is on his teammate who is laying out of bounds.
Umm. Wrong. He is only out of bounds if he touches out of bounds himself or a player out of bounds touches the ball while out of bounds before the player catches it and lands in bounds.
You seriously have no idea how the rules work.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:46 pm to Nitrogen
quote:
look how divided everyone is about the call, thats why you don’t overturn it it was simply a business decision by Phillips and co on Tobacco Road
People are divided on the call because the underdog lost. Not because it was the correct call.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The instant 9 for VT hits the ground he is on his teammate who is laying out of bounds. It’s incomplete from that moment and nothing matters. 9 never once hits in bounds with the ball touching his hands
This. Which, remarkably, the broadcast crew and the "expert" official failed to ever mention. If not for their incompetence this wouldn't even be an issue.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:46 pm to TigerNlc
It was incomplete multiple ways
1. Never had full possession for long enough
2. Laying on a teammate who was out of bounds while the catch was "completed"
1. Never had full possession for long enough
2. Laying on a teammate who was out of bounds while the catch was "completed"
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Yes it did. It clearly shows #9 landing on his teammate who is out of bounds
I respectfully disagree. Theoretically possession was before that.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Yes it did. It clearly shows #9 landing on his teammate who is out of bounds
Dude he clearly touched in bounds with the ball in his hands. Now you are just trying to fight your pathetic argument in a different way and even that isn’t correct, but that is typical you so no one is shocked.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm to SirWinston
That ball still hasn’t touched the ground.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:Um, his teammates hand is completely on the ball. Same with the Miami player who is out of bounds as well
Umm. Wrong. He is only out of bounds if he touches out of bounds himself or a player out of bounds touches the ball while out of bounds before the player catches it and lands in bounds. You seriously have no idea how the rules work.
You have two players landing out of bounds touching the ball the same exact time #9 for VT hits the ground
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:48 pm to SirWinston
quote:
1. Never had full possession for long enough
That’s not how it works in the end zone.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:48 pm to SirWinston
quote:
2. Laying on a teammate who was out of bounds while the catch was "completed"
So according to you, a defensive player just needs to step out of bounds and touch the receiver before they come down to make it incomplete for sure?
Some of you have no idea how the rules work. Good God.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:50 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:I honestly don't to the extent required to make a call on that play. Are most folks saying it was a TD?
Some of you have no idea how the rules work.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News