- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:34 pm to Geauxgurt
Wasn't a catch.
The holding call on VT on long run in 3rd qtr was bogus, though.
The holding call on VT on long run in 3rd qtr was bogus, though.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:35 pm to Geauxgurt
It’s very simple… to overturn the original call there has to be 100% iron clad conclusive evidence. The replay showed a multitude of possibilities (the most being that it was a catch). How on earth does that get overturned?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:35 pm to Geauxgurt
That was a bigger Miami steal than that kickoff return TD against Duke. 
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:35 pm to Geauxgurt
Refs absolutely STOLE that win from Virginia Tech
That was a LOSS for Miami
That was a LOSS for Miami
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:35 pm to mattz1122
Absolutely. They just wanted the refs out alive.
No explanation, just the “call is reversed”
No explanation, just the “call is reversed”
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:36 pm to TNTigerman
I don’t think it was a clear catch, but that’s a tough call to reverse.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:36 pm to BluegrassCardinal
They 100% got that right, complicated it for themselves with a bad on field ruling but the final result was correct.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:37 pm to Random LSU Hero
The call on the field was atrocious to begin with.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:37 pm to Geauxgurt
I’m honestly stuck somewhere between ‘there wasn’t enough evidence to overturn the call on the field’ and ‘he didn’t complete the catch’
But 9 for VT definitely initially came down with it
What a crazy ending
But 9 for VT definitely initially came down with it
What a crazy ending
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:37 pm to RandySavage
quote:
They 100% got that right
Did they have a better angle or something?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:38 pm to RandySavage
quote:
complicated it for themselves with a bad on field ruling
The 2 officials were right there though. Whether the original called sucked or not, it was the original call
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:38 pm to BZ504
quote:
I don’t think it was a clear catch, but that’s a tough call to reverse.
They called it a catch. There’s not enough evidence to reverse it. Refs fricked up.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
atrocious
I don’t think it was in real time
Please don’t go 7 pages with me about this
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:38 pm to HailToTheChiz
Why would you suspend the field crew? Looked like they had it right. 
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:39 pm to TigerNlc
quote:
They called it a catch. There’s not enough evidence to reverse it. Refs fricked up.
Basically
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:39 pm to RandySavage
Both refs were right there and said a catch. Not sure but he definitely out jumped everyone and had the ball. Whether he came down when his arse hit the ground IDK. Because of that his in the frick do you overturn it? You can’t see the ball at all…..ACC taking some pointers from the most crooked conference on the planet the SEC.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:39 pm to RandySavage
Yep, the call on the field was bad, yet there wasn’t enough evidence to overturn the call.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:40 pm to BluegrassCardinal
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:40 pm to TigerNlc
quote:
I think he possessed it long enough for it to be a catch.
Both the receiver and defender together controlled the ball to make it a catch. They came down inbounds with both their hand on it. Wasn’t bobbling when they landed . It was definitely caught. A tie like that should go to the receiver.
The ACC wanted to protect Miami so that’s what they called
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News