- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2026 Formula 1 (F1) Season Thread
Posted on 4/6/26 at 2:45 pm to Gulf Coast Tiger
Posted on 4/6/26 at 2:45 pm to Gulf Coast Tiger
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Now, there’s a regulation in Formula 1. It’s been around forever. It’s very simple and far reaching. The driver must drive the car alone and unaided. [..] The driver shouldn’t have any surprises by a self-learning car. They’ve got to get rid of that. I’m sure it’s not the work of a moment, but you know, the power delivery must be proportional to what the driver is doing with the throttle. That’s a fundamental. It has to be linear. It’s a big issue for the FIA."
Posted on 4/6/26 at 2:59 pm to lsulaker
quote:
Im cheap so I refused to pay for Apple TV for F1 and dont feel like Ive missed anything
This tells me you've missed out on:
Severance
Shrinking
Black bird
Dark matter
Pluribus
The Offer
The Studio
Platonic
Slow horses
Drops of God
Mythic Quest
Might nopt have missed out on F1 but those are all worth a watch
Posted on 4/6/26 at 3:55 pm to MississippiLebowski
quote:
It’s a big issue for the FIA."
One after another... Sad that its come to this, but I'm hoping more and more black eyes for them that force their hand to completely overhaul regulations on an expedited timeline.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 4:29 pm to Lsut81
Red Bull isn’t just over weight. They messed up their center of gravity or weight distribution calculations and have actually had to add weight ballast to areas of the car to get the balance within regulations. Does not sound like something easy to fix.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 4/6/26 at 4:32 pm to MississippiLebowski
Does that read that they are overweight but only because they are using ballast to balance to the rules?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 4:38 pm to fightin tigers
That’s what I got from that. The rules dictate weight balance. I think generally around 45% of the total weight has to be on the front axle.
The design of their chassis and engine didn’t allow them to reach this without adding unnecessary weight.
The design of their chassis and engine didn’t allow them to reach this without adding unnecessary weight.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:25 pm to MississippiLebowski
Ruh Roh
Way too far away, but...

quote:
According to the German outlet Auto Motor und Sport, preliminary discussions regarding the 2031 engine formula are already happening behind closed doors. The most notable detail emerging from the paddock is that F1 is actively considering dropping its heavy hybrid systems entirely in favor of a 2.4-liter turbocharged V8.
Way too far away, but...

Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:11 am to Lsut81
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:39 am to MississippiLebowski
Basically "You think we're that dumb that we can't build a car that doesn't need to downshift to maintain speed/power"
Well, guess the FIA was Toto
Well, guess the FIA was Toto
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:08 pm to Lsut81
Back in the 80s I raced a showroom stock CRX and often downshifted on long straights to see if it would pull better in 4th instead of 5th. Depending on the straight, sometimes it did
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:31 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Back in the 80s I raced a showroom stock CRX and often downshifted on long straights to see if it would pull better in 4th instead of 5th. Depending on the straight, sometimes it did
You're talking about changing speeds on purpose.
The issue with the cars is flat out on the straights, they are clipping and losing speed due to the stupid fricking batteries. They shouldn't be doing that. They were losing 50kph from 2025 in Japan.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 5:04 pm to Lsut81
For those without Apple+ looking for a way to watch. Joking aside this could be awesome, will prolly do so bad they never try it again tho.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 4/7/26 at 5:05 pm to Lsut81
Yeah, one is a torque curve and power band while the other is battery bullshite.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 5:14 pm to MississippiLebowski
That is pretty cool
Posted on 4/7/26 at 5:19 pm to MississippiLebowski
How much are they going to charge for that shite?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:06 pm to Lsut81
quote:
How much are they going to charge for that shite?
Apple TV subscribers are going to get a substantial discount, right? Right?
Why would they offer a discount to Apple TV subscribers? Because Apple TV's F1 viewers are the people who are most likely to want to attend these showings. But we have already paid them for access to watch F1. We want to go, but it doesn't make sense to pay them another $22 to see it in IMAX. Charge Apple TV subscribers $10 and it will a more interesting proposition. Otherwise, it doesn't seem like attendance will be very good. Part of the issue is marketing. It's going to be hard to reach non-Apple TV subscribers.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:33 pm to TouchedTheAxeIn82
quote:
Charge Apple TV subscribers $10 and it will a more interesting proposition.
Should be free for AppleTV subscribers and maybe $10 for non.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:27 am to Lsut81
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. They have blamed some of this on developing last years car so deep into the season but Wache might lose his job.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:01 am to MississippiLebowski
quote:
They have blamed some of this on developing last years car so deep into the season but Wache might lose his job.
My question would be how much of a role did Newey play before leaving for AM? Did he frick up RB and AM all within the same regulations?
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:32 am to Lsut81
Here’s a great summary of issues and how complaints went:
This is a reply to that post:
Era
@redbullbaby05
All right, buddy, let’s get the chronology right
2023 - Max is already warned about the planned 2026 rules after seeing early simulator work. He says he doesn’t like the direction, especially the heavy reliance on battery power and energy management.
2023–2025 – almost nobody else pushes back, F1 and the FIA publicly sell 2026 as greener and more electric. Most drivers and media speak about it in neutral or positive terms.
Bahrain test 2026 – first big public rant
by Max. He says the cars are “not fun” to drive, calls it more like “Formula E on steroids,” and argues that F1 should get rid of battery power. He attacks the 50/50 split and says the increased electrical dependence is anti-racing because it turns the sport into energy management instead of pure driving.
Hamilton says he needs a college degree to understand the tech part of it.
Australia 2026 – opening race under new regs. Mercedes are fastest, Ferrari are fast, Red Bull and McLaren are in trouble.
From free practice onward, Max is complaining that racing is completely dominated by battery deployment and harvesting windows. Around this phase (Australia/China), he drops the “Mario Kart” line, saying it’s not real racing anymore, just boosting past each other and then getting re-passed when the battery is empty. He says that if someone likes this, they don’t understand what racing is.
Max and Oscar crash heavily during quali and recon lap.
George is happy.
Lando finds it “funny” and “ragebaits” says Max is only moaning because he’s slow and if he wants to leave he should.
Drivers of top cars react very differently. Hamilton praises the new era’s wheel-to-wheel action and calls some of the races among the best racing he has seen.
Lando initially pushes back at Max’s negativity and basically says that if Max doesn’t like it, he can leave F1 because everyone else is enjoying the cars.
Team bosses (Toto Wolff) and a lot of media frame Max’s criticism as frustration because Red Bull are uncompetitive.
China 2026 – contrast hardens
By China, Max doubles down and repeats that the racing is like Mario Kart: you hit the boost, pass, then get re-passed when you’re out of energy. He calls it a joke and says this isn’t proper F1.
Hamilton says it’s the best racing he’s ever done.
The narrative in coverage becomes: Max hates it, Ham, Lando and George love it.
Charles isn’t entirely happy.
Lando, who originally defended the new regs and mocked Max’s stance, contradicts himself, admitting he’d said some things just to see the reaction.
Alonso calls it the “battery world championship”
Charles hates what qualifying has become
Japanese GP 2026 –
Ham vs Lando exposes the flaw
their fight makes the energy-management issue impossible to ignore.
Their duel shows how much their w2w battle depends on hybrid deployment and harvesting, not just on racecraft, braking and throttle.
Ollie has a massive crash.
Analysis after the race focuses on how the energy rules can effectively “force” a driver into certain moves or prevent them from doing what they strategically want, because the hybrid system’s behaviour and the regulations dictate when you can push or must recharge.
Lando says “it doesn’t matter what we say”
He publicly becomes much more sceptical.
Carlos and Charles publicly show their disdain.
Lando’s comments line up very closely with the same issues Max has been screaming about since Bahrain: the battery, deployment rules, and energy windows overriding driver choice.
Media tone shift after Norris’s statement, a lot of Brit-leaning analysis suddenly take the battery-over-driver issue far more seriously.
The same core criticisms that the hybrid rules are forcing artificial moves and constraining racecraft are now being discussed in detail, even though Max had been saying almost exactly this since 2023 and then relentlessly from the first 2026 test and the opening races.
Max should learn English so Brundle can understand.
X LINK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This is a reply to that post:
Era
@redbullbaby05
All right, buddy, let’s get the chronology right
2023 - Max is already warned about the planned 2026 rules after seeing early simulator work. He says he doesn’t like the direction, especially the heavy reliance on battery power and energy management.
2023–2025 – almost nobody else pushes back, F1 and the FIA publicly sell 2026 as greener and more electric. Most drivers and media speak about it in neutral or positive terms.
Bahrain test 2026 – first big public rant
by Max. He says the cars are “not fun” to drive, calls it more like “Formula E on steroids,” and argues that F1 should get rid of battery power. He attacks the 50/50 split and says the increased electrical dependence is anti-racing because it turns the sport into energy management instead of pure driving.
Hamilton says he needs a college degree to understand the tech part of it.
Australia 2026 – opening race under new regs. Mercedes are fastest, Ferrari are fast, Red Bull and McLaren are in trouble.
From free practice onward, Max is complaining that racing is completely dominated by battery deployment and harvesting windows. Around this phase (Australia/China), he drops the “Mario Kart” line, saying it’s not real racing anymore, just boosting past each other and then getting re-passed when the battery is empty. He says that if someone likes this, they don’t understand what racing is.
Max and Oscar crash heavily during quali and recon lap.
George is happy.
Lando finds it “funny” and “ragebaits” says Max is only moaning because he’s slow and if he wants to leave he should.
Drivers of top cars react very differently. Hamilton praises the new era’s wheel-to-wheel action and calls some of the races among the best racing he has seen.
Lando initially pushes back at Max’s negativity and basically says that if Max doesn’t like it, he can leave F1 because everyone else is enjoying the cars.
Team bosses (Toto Wolff) and a lot of media frame Max’s criticism as frustration because Red Bull are uncompetitive.
China 2026 – contrast hardens
By China, Max doubles down and repeats that the racing is like Mario Kart: you hit the boost, pass, then get re-passed when you’re out of energy. He calls it a joke and says this isn’t proper F1.
Hamilton says it’s the best racing he’s ever done.
The narrative in coverage becomes: Max hates it, Ham, Lando and George love it.
Charles isn’t entirely happy.
Lando, who originally defended the new regs and mocked Max’s stance, contradicts himself, admitting he’d said some things just to see the reaction.
Alonso calls it the “battery world championship”
Charles hates what qualifying has become
Japanese GP 2026 –
Ham vs Lando exposes the flaw
their fight makes the energy-management issue impossible to ignore.
Their duel shows how much their w2w battle depends on hybrid deployment and harvesting, not just on racecraft, braking and throttle.
Ollie has a massive crash.
Analysis after the race focuses on how the energy rules can effectively “force” a driver into certain moves or prevent them from doing what they strategically want, because the hybrid system’s behaviour and the regulations dictate when you can push or must recharge.
Lando says “it doesn’t matter what we say”
He publicly becomes much more sceptical.
Carlos and Charles publicly show their disdain.
Lando’s comments line up very closely with the same issues Max has been screaming about since Bahrain: the battery, deployment rules, and energy windows overriding driver choice.
Media tone shift after Norris’s statement, a lot of Brit-leaning analysis suddenly take the battery-over-driver issue far more seriously.
The same core criticisms that the hybrid rules are forcing artificial moves and constraining racecraft are now being discussed in detail, even though Max had been saying almost exactly this since 2023 and then relentlessly from the first 2026 test and the opening races.
Max should learn English so Brundle can understand.
X LINK
Popular
Back to top


1





