- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1995 Nebraska dominant stats
Posted on 1/16/20 at 9:26 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 1/16/20 at 9:26 pm to Scruffy
But the elite players from the mid-1990s could absolutely compete today. There’s not been that big a difference in size and speed of football players.
If you want to talk about 1985 players then sure. But 1995? Those guys, esp at Nebraska, had plenty weightlifting and elite speed.
If you want to talk about 1985 players then sure. But 1995? Those guys, esp at Nebraska, had plenty weightlifting and elite speed.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 9:33 pm to biglego
quote:With today’s weight training gear and exercise physiology research, absolutely.
But the elite players from the mid-1990s could absolutely compete today.
Not to mention the legal bulking and strength training boosters.
That team, from that time period, versus many different teams from our modern era, they would lose.
We still haven’t peaked as a species.
20 years from now, we will likely have advanced again and people will continue to have this argument and it will, again, come down to the fact that the future athletes will be outpacing the contemporary ones.
That is how it will always work.
quote:Then why are mainly modern players at the top of the combine’s record lists?
If you want to talk about 1985 players then sure. But 1995? Those guys, esp at Nebraska, had plenty weightlifting and elite speed.
I mean, they are all pretty much from 2010 on, actually.
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:01 pm to Scruffy
And most of those combine records were set by players who were mediocre at best players. Players now specifically train for the combine on a level they weren’t 25 years ago, hell not even 15 years ago.
You’re splitting hairs on margins.
You’re also not taking into account other variables: in game rule changes, off the field requirements, game tech, and so on.
But the point still remains, LSU had a great season. They did not have the best nor most dominant season of all time. If Tua was healthy, LSU is in the Sugar Bowl playing Baylor.
Hell LSU’s margin between PPG and PPGA wasn’t even the best in their own conference this year.
You’re splitting hairs on margins.
You’re also not taking into account other variables: in game rule changes, off the field requirements, game tech, and so on.
But the point still remains, LSU had a great season. They did not have the best nor most dominant season of all time. If Tua was healthy, LSU is in the Sugar Bowl playing Baylor.
Hell LSU’s margin between PPG and PPGA wasn’t even the best in their own conference this year.
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:08 pm to TheeRealCarolina
South Carolina lost to UNC, Missery, Tennessee, and App State.
The opinions of any fan of that team in regards to anything athletics related are irrelevant and discarded immediately.
At least beat App State and Missery before you comment about any other football team and their successes.
The opinions of any fan of that team in regards to anything athletics related are irrelevant and discarded immediately.
At least beat App State and Missery before you comment about any other football team and their successes.
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:09 pm to Scruffy
Didn’t you lose to Troy before?
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:10 pm to TheeRealCarolina
We made up for our shittiness.
Maybe y’all will too one day, but I highly doubt it.
Maybe y’all will too one day, but I highly doubt it.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:11 pm to Scruffy
Very low IQ posts from you Scruffy. Hitting that sauce hard or that hangover hanging on?
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:16 pm to TheeRealCarolina
Nah, my posts have nothing to do with LSU, yet you decided to bring them up, although I feel that multiple modern teams (LSU, Bama, Clemson, OSU, Penn State, among others) would beat Nebraska, just like Nebraska and multiple 90s teams would beat any team from 1975.
I’ll make the same argument in 2040, that many teams from that era would beat this current LSU team and Nebraska and any team from before.
It is how progression works.
You started with a troll and didn’t deserve a proper response.
I’ll make the same argument in 2040, that many teams from that era would beat this current LSU team and Nebraska and any team from before.
It is how progression works.
You started with a troll and didn’t deserve a proper response.
This post was edited on 1/16/20 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:22 pm to Scruffy
Oh I forgot, Louisiana treats any FACT that doesn’t agree with their biased OPINION as a troll.
As you were corndog.
As you were corndog.
Posted on 1/16/20 at 10:40 pm to Scruffy
1995 is just not long enough ago to see this gulf in athletic performance. We’re only talking 6 years prior to that 2001 Miami team which people still talk about as the greatest collection of talent assembled in college. You still had players from that Miami team in the NFL not that long ago. Some players actually spend 6 years in college (Kirsten Pitman at LSU for example). So you’re talking one class prior to the 2001 era which we know could still compete.
The improvement of athletic performances since then would be seen on the average but the elite talents from 1995 would do fine today. Ray Lewis and Warren Sapp lost to Nebraska.
The improvement of athletic performances since then would be seen on the average but the elite talents from 1995 would do fine today. Ray Lewis and Warren Sapp lost to Nebraska.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 9:56 am to biglego
quote:
1995 is just not long enough ago to see this gulf in athletic performance.
Yeah. I think it is more rule based changes. Like if players had to play both ways like back in the day and not have all the tv timeouts, reviews, etc. and substitutions of today players, at least lineman, just wouldn't be as big. As time goes on the league adjusts to allow for more specialization of players allowing the margins of "performance" to be wider.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 10:05 am to biglego
Lewis and Sapp got worked in that Orange Bowl. Miami's entire D was standing around with hands on their hips in the 4th quarter. Schlesinger rumbling into the endzone on the fullback trap was an absolute thing of beauty, I can watch that play over and over.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 5:35 pm to Cfrobel
He did it twice - exact same play on back-to-back drives! The fullbacks they had back in those days — Schlesinger, and the Makovickas, were horses.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 7:31 pm to Cfrobel
I remember that too. I still like Nebraska and wish they’d become relevant again. I’m just saying 1995 Nebraska may or may not be able to beat 2019 LSU, but it would certainly compete and wouldn’t lose due to any athletic deficiencies.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 9:31 pm to biglego
I think it all comes down to the rules, 2019 LSU is the best I've seen since the rules changed dramatically to favor the pass. Nebraska in 95 was the perfection of power football.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 10:24 pm to TheeRealCarolina
quote:
If Tua was healthy, LSU is in the Sugar Bowl playing Baylor.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 11:25 pm to PeteRose
‘19 LSU would destroy the Nebraska Steroids.
Posted on 1/17/20 at 11:36 pm to ClampClampington
quote:
They didn’t give up a sack all season. A single one. That’s mind blowing
Not when you run the focking option
Posted on 1/17/20 at 11:38 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
When you look at 2001 Miami, they were loaded with talent yet 1995 Nebraska has far
But they also weren't nearly as good at college football.
Popular
Back to top


1




