- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The myth of gold being an inflation hedge
Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:33 am to HarnessedInSlums
Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:33 am to HarnessedInSlums
Ok, so you don't know how to do it. I get it.
Thanks for playing....
Thanks for playing....
Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:37 am to HarnessedInSlums
'You know this and I know this. So why engage in brainless schmuckery?'
Because ruskie is a Whore For Government Stats...and, we all know that the last thing the Fed wants is people selling off dollars and buying gold...cause bankers have absolutely no control over gold in private hands. Right WHOGAS?

Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:45 am to Rivers
quote:I don't.
What do you care if I am holding gold?
But I do care that people like you and your hysterical man-crush Mish are misleading people to buy only gold for an investment, for all the wrong reasons, such as it is an inflation hedge. It isn't.
Oh, that's right, you also have cash and CD's, too, so you don't only have gold as an investment. (Do you realize how stupid you make yourself look when you criticize the dollar as a "fiat currency" and then admit you have a significant amount of your savings in dollars in the form of cash and CD's? Really, really stupid....

I think there is a place for commodities for any person's investment portfolio. I prefer oil as my main commodity holding,. But I don't buy barrels of the stuff which I have store in my safe deposit box or in a garage. I buy stock in companies which produce or refine it. It accomplishes the same thing.
I've been making asses out of gold bugs for 20 years. You're just the most recent one.
Mission accomplished!

Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:49 am to LSURussian
If your mission was to make yourself look like a moron, you have succeeded.
Could you let us in on which financial institution/bank you are associated with? I will make sure to avoid it like the plague.

Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:50 am to LSURussian
quote:
Ok, so you don't know how to do it. I get it.
Yes. Only you, in your infinite, fiat-dollar-loving wisdom, know how to google for articles that support your worldview.
I bow to you, Mr. Money Changer Research God.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 10:57 am to LSURussian
Russian
I am by no means an economist but I don't see how gold could be a bad investment. If it continues to have similar performance over the next 30yrs then it seems to be a safe way to leave my children and grandchildren a tax free (until they try to sell it) inheritance that will continue to grow.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:07 am to HarnessedInSlums
quote:
Yes. Only you, in your infinite, fiat-dollar-loving wisdom, know how to google for articles that support your worldview.
I bow to you, Mr. Money Changer Research God.
Please go back to whence you came if you're just going to sit around and call people names.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:08 am to Rivers
quote:
There have been over 8,000 fiat currencies in world history and every one of them have gone to zero value, usually due to bad governance.
This is irrelevant because for the scenario goldbugs love to promote, all the currencies would have to go bust at the same time.
So if I happen to have a bunch of dollars, pesos, pounds, euros, renminbi and yen, and the dollar goes to zero, my entire basket still has value.
And if I have a house and a nice stock portfolio, none of that matters because they also have value.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:10 am to Rivers
quote:
So what? You never took a bath on a stock?
I have, but nothing compared with the bath you have taken on gold.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:14 am to kfizzle85
quote:
Please go back to whence you came if you're just going to sit around and call people names.
Are you going to call Russian out for calling me a "jerkoff", or are you as dishonest as he is?
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:15 am to LSURussian
Russian, that article was a nice find.
"Yet gold is valuable only as long as we collectively agree that it is. It may be soft, shiny, durable, and rare, but it has no more intrinsic value than feldspar or quartz. Just because it has a long history of being used as money doesn’t mean that it has a future. In the end, our trust in gold is no different from our trust in a piece of paper with “one dollar” written on it. The value of a currency is, ultimately, what someone will give you for it"
This is the key. If everything goes to hell, there is no reason why gold should necessarily have any value to speak of. You can't eat it, it's a terrible construction material. Canned goods would be far better.
"Yet gold is valuable only as long as we collectively agree that it is. It may be soft, shiny, durable, and rare, but it has no more intrinsic value than feldspar or quartz. Just because it has a long history of being used as money doesn’t mean that it has a future. In the end, our trust in gold is no different from our trust in a piece of paper with “one dollar” written on it. The value of a currency is, ultimately, what someone will give you for it"
This is the key. If everything goes to hell, there is no reason why gold should necessarily have any value to speak of. You can't eat it, it's a terrible construction material. Canned goods would be far better.
This post was edited on 8/18/09 at 11:16 am
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:19 am to foshizzle
quote:
In the end, our trust in gold is no different from our trust in a piece of paper with “one dollar” written on it.
Oh really? A rare metal that requires extreme effort to get it from mountain to hand is only worthy of the same kind of trust garnered by dollars infinitely printed by government whim and machines?
Yeah, that sure makes a ton of sense.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:24 am to foshizzle


Last time I checked it was costing about $450 oz to bring gold from rock to finished product. That isn't a bad floor.
Printing dollars is almost costless.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:37 am to HarnessedInSlums
There is zero question that you an alter.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:38 am to foshizzle
quote:
So if I happen to have a bunch of dollars, pesos, pounds, euros, renminbi and yen, and the dollar goes to zero, my entire basket still has value. And if I have a house and a nice stock portfolio, none of that matters because they also have value.
Yet another reason for international equity investing which provides currency diversification. Gold sure seems to get certain parties panties in a wad....
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:47 am to tirebiter
' Gold sure seems to get certain parties panties in a wad....'
Yeah, you, WHOGAS, and the usual suspects. Did you read and comprehend Greenspan's paper on gold ownership and why it is necessary? Or, do you wanna play the banksters game and let them take a bigger and bigger bite of your earnings? Time to wake up!
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:50 am to bayoudude
Good questions, bayoudude. I will try to answer them and I apologize in advance for the length of my response.
None of us knows what gold or any investment will do over the next 30 years. Gold might be the best investment. It also might not be. So when gold bugs try to spread their poison that the world will end soon (that has been going on for centuries, btw) and that only gold will get a person through it, well, that is just plain wrong.
Now, specifically looking at the graph you posted, look at the period on it between December 31, 1982 and December 31, 2006. That's 24 years when the nominal price of gold increased from around $456.90/oz to $632.00/oz, or 38%. (I used this website to get the precise numbers LINK ). No dividends, no interest, and yet inflation during that time was 106.76% (using this website LINK to calculate the inflation rate during that time.)
That means gold, if it was truly an inflation hedge, should have increased from that original $456.90/oz to $945/oz (compared to $939 today) just to remain even with inflation.
The recent spike up in the nominal price of gold can really be just considered a 'catch up' to inflation, not a hedge against inflation.
I could not find a graph for the S&P 500 index during that time, but here are the raw numbers:
12/31/82 = 140.64
12/31/06 = 1418.30
And increase of 908%, far outpacing the 106.7% pace of inflation during that time (compared to the 38% for gold shown above).
Which would you rather have left your grandchildren with?
Except it may not be tax free. There is an inheritance tax due on assets, above a certain level, passed on to the next generation(s) and the tax is based upon the value of the asset at the time of death (Or a period later if you chose the alternative valuation date. I will leave the tax questions to Poodlebrain. He's the expert on taxes.) Of course, the tax implications would apply to stocks as well as gold. And with gold (or stocks), your grandchildren might have to sell it in order to raise the money needed to pay the taxes. The gold market is not nearly as liquid or efficient as the stock market. Transaction costs are higher and the bid/offer spread is wider.
To sum up, gold MIGHT be the best investment over the next 30 years. But it historically has not been a better investment than owning stock in companies over a long-term period of time.
None of us knows what gold or any investment will do over the next 30 years. Gold might be the best investment. It also might not be. So when gold bugs try to spread their poison that the world will end soon (that has been going on for centuries, btw) and that only gold will get a person through it, well, that is just plain wrong.
Now, specifically looking at the graph you posted, look at the period on it between December 31, 1982 and December 31, 2006. That's 24 years when the nominal price of gold increased from around $456.90/oz to $632.00/oz, or 38%. (I used this website to get the precise numbers LINK ). No dividends, no interest, and yet inflation during that time was 106.76% (using this website LINK to calculate the inflation rate during that time.)
That means gold, if it was truly an inflation hedge, should have increased from that original $456.90/oz to $945/oz (compared to $939 today) just to remain even with inflation.
The recent spike up in the nominal price of gold can really be just considered a 'catch up' to inflation, not a hedge against inflation.
I could not find a graph for the S&P 500 index during that time, but here are the raw numbers:
12/31/82 = 140.64
12/31/06 = 1418.30
And increase of 908%, far outpacing the 106.7% pace of inflation during that time (compared to the 38% for gold shown above).
Which would you rather have left your grandchildren with?
quote:
it seems to be a safe way to leave my children and grandchildren a tax free
Except it may not be tax free. There is an inheritance tax due on assets, above a certain level, passed on to the next generation(s) and the tax is based upon the value of the asset at the time of death (Or a period later if you chose the alternative valuation date. I will leave the tax questions to Poodlebrain. He's the expert on taxes.) Of course, the tax implications would apply to stocks as well as gold. And with gold (or stocks), your grandchildren might have to sell it in order to raise the money needed to pay the taxes. The gold market is not nearly as liquid or efficient as the stock market. Transaction costs are higher and the bid/offer spread is wider.
To sum up, gold MIGHT be the best investment over the next 30 years. But it historically has not been a better investment than owning stock in companies over a long-term period of time.
Posted on 8/18/09 at 11:59 am to LSURussian
What a crock! Yeah, I wanna leave my kids a lot of dollars because they did so well from 1913 till now...only losing 96% of their value.
Yeah, I wanna leave my kids invested in a market that is totally controlled by a few big bankers and dependent on Fed bailout money to continue to expand. Duh...wonder how long the Fed can continue to dump $250 billion a quarter into the economy thru the slime ball bankers??? How much QE is too much? Wich fiat bill will be the one that destroys our economy?
How long will people put up with slime ball bankers using their tax money, that the Fed gives them at near zero interest, and lends back to said people at exhorbitant interest rates or not at all??? Wake up folks! You're being had!

Yeah, I wanna leave my kids invested in a market that is totally controlled by a few big bankers and dependent on Fed bailout money to continue to expand. Duh...wonder how long the Fed can continue to dump $250 billion a quarter into the economy thru the slime ball bankers??? How much QE is too much? Wich fiat bill will be the one that destroys our economy?
How long will people put up with slime ball bankers using their tax money, that the Fed gives them at near zero interest, and lends back to said people at exhorbitant interest rates or not at all??? Wake up folks! You're being had!
Posted on 8/18/09 at 12:06 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
Please go back to whence you came if you're just going to sit around and call people names.
That is a trademark of gold bugs when they get cornered, kfizz. They are all alike.
They can't use facts, numbers or logic to prove their fascination with that "soft, pliable, yellow metal" so they have to resort to personal attacks to anyone who questions their "wisdom."
In fact, true believer gold bugs all fit the same personality type: distrusting, paranoid schizophrenics. They are all the stereotypical crazy uncle at family reunions who everyone tries to avoid.
ETA: SEE?!?
quote:
Yeah, I wanna leave my kids invested in a market that is totally controlled by a few big bankers
quote:Good catch! I didn't consider that. Rivers lives in Florida. The alter is from Florida. Hmmmmmmmmm??
There is zero question that you an alter.
If it is not an alter, it might prove there is something in Florida drinking water which creates a fetish in people's brains for soft, pliable, yellow metal.

This post was edited on 8/18/09 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 8/18/09 at 12:14 pm to LSURussian
'That is a trademark of financial advisers when they get cornered, kfizz. They are all alike.'
They can't use facts, numbers or logic to prove their fascination with the stock market so they have to resort to personal attacks to anyone who questions their "wisdom."
In fact, true believer gamblers, day traders, bankers, financial analysts, all fit the same personality type: distrusting, paranoid schizophrenics. They are all the stereotypical crazy uncle at family reunions who everyone tries to avoid.'
Wow, what a genric description. It even encompasses WHOGAS. Care to generalize a bit more ruskie? I did not realize the extent of your talents...you're even a psychoanalyst. Better be careful, the AMA will be on your dumb azz.
HarnessedInSlums...not my alter but I am glad he/she is posting. Not that I need any help to bury your azz, WHOGAS...but it is nice to hear a different point of view. We already know yours.

They can't use facts, numbers or logic to prove their fascination with the stock market so they have to resort to personal attacks to anyone who questions their "wisdom."
In fact, true believer gamblers, day traders, bankers, financial analysts, all fit the same personality type: distrusting, paranoid schizophrenics. They are all the stereotypical crazy uncle at family reunions who everyone tries to avoid.'
Wow, what a genric description. It even encompasses WHOGAS. Care to generalize a bit more ruskie? I did not realize the extent of your talents...you're even a psychoanalyst. Better be careful, the AMA will be on your dumb azz.
HarnessedInSlums...not my alter but I am glad he/she is posting. Not that I need any help to bury your azz, WHOGAS...but it is nice to hear a different point of view. We already know yours.


This post was edited on 8/18/09 at 12:24 pm
Popular
Back to top
