Started By
Message

re: Stocks under $50 that pay a dividend

Posted on 3/21/26 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39774 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 4:44 pm to
Despite the dumb constraint, the answer to the OP's question is:

ECC @ $3.50

The stock is WAY DOWN, but is still paying close to 20% dividend. This is after they aggressively cut it.

It's been a confluence of unfortunate factors, but none of them seem to actually be fundamental.

The CLO equity collateral has been utterly punished, but for what reason? SAASpocalypse? There have been effectively zero defaults and zero missed payments.

Very possible to get a melt-up here as well as a special dividend before year end as they accumulate cash.
Posted by TX_Tiger23
Seabrook, Texas
Member since Aug 2013
154 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 6:03 pm to
KYN is a fund
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95517 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

More likely to be able to choose multiple companies to diversify and spread the risk, Spread it among three companies instead of just buying one.


Why complicate your life? If this is the goal, buy dividend ETFs or mutual funds.

What am I missing?
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11013 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 1:21 pm to
Yea I been using Chat got to run the numbers on a lot of different tickers. Starting with a 10k investment in each then adding 500 weekly split 35/35/30 it came back with QQQ, SCHD, SMH more times than not after changing the qualifications a bunch of times.
Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
2073 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 2:35 am to
quote:

ECC @ 3.50.. The stock is WAY DOWN, but is still paying close to 20% dividend.


Dafuq are you talking about?

It isn't paying a dividend on RH. It actually has a 10% expense ratio to boot.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91836 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:15 am to
quote:

Share price absolutely matters if you want to spread the risk.


Just buy SCHD then.
Posted by whodatigahbait
Uptown
Member since Oct 2007
1849 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:


As stated, yield is yield.
No matter what the stock price is, you're going to get a certain dollar amount in dividends per $1,000 or per million invested.

The stock price is irrelevant


The ONLY reason price might be relevant is if you were looking to employ a covered call strategy on DVD stocks.

That is the only reason I can think of.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
24532 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

The ONLY reason price might be relevant is if you were looking to employ a covered call strategy on DVD stocks.

Yeah, I don't get the diversication line either...
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40286 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Kinder Morgan



kicking myself for not going all in on this after i read Smartest men in the room and Rich Kinder was clearly the smartest dude at Enron
Posted by whodatigahbait
Uptown
Member since Oct 2007
1849 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Rich Kinder


You mis-spelled John Arnold
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39774 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 4:01 pm to
quote:


Dafuq are you talking about?

It isn't paying a dividend on RH. It
wut

It pays .06/month on a $3.50 price. That's 20.5%.
Posted by CecilShortsHisPants
One Foty Fo uh uh Magnolia Screet
Member since Oct 2012
3834 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:15 pm to
I’ll say it, dividends are for suckers
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11013 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:14 am to
Well shite your highness, you have the floor ….
Posted by Mootsman
Charlotte, NC
Member since Oct 2012
6226 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:39 am to
There are several BDCs I own that are currently at a relatively steep discount given everything going on with private credit at the moment. All pay 10%+ and are in the $10-$20 / share range.

OBDC
BXSL
ARCC
ABR (should probably stay away from this one)
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39774 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

There are several BDCs I own that are currently at a relatively steep discount
My problem with BDCs vs ECC:

--yields 20%, even after cutting the dividend more than 50%

--the discounts at present are way lower than they have been in past times of true stress

--BDCs basically mark the loans at par unless something really bad has happened. Similar to credit cards, the best month of all time usually precedes the worst month of all time, as all of a sudden, things are clarified

--BDCs aren't required to reserve for losses

--BDSc have very limited upside above theoretical NAV

ECC - where the collateral is broadly syndicated loans and not private credit:

--marks underlying positions to market - and the marks have been utterly brutal, even in the absence of any defaults or credit events. That is to say, you are buying something that has already been marked way down - not something waiting to be marked down

--trades at a much bigger discount to NAV (again, an NAV that represents brutal down marks)

--is required to carry "OC cushion" as a defense against losses. Essentially, this is a reserve bucket that BDCs don't have. Presently, the OC cushion is about the biggest it's ever been

--at least has the potential for upside beyond NAV, as it can and will attempt to buy loans at a discount to par and the ride them up. All of the capital gains in that scenario (beyond the ordinary income gains) accrue to the equity positions held


CLO equity had an extremely harsh February (on top of several months of under-performance). However, that is all market sentiment and mark-to-market. There have been no actual credit events of note, no defaults and certainly no stopped payments from the CLOs themselves. That is why I say there is a very real chance of a "melt up" as well as for a special dividend or two later in the year, as this thing is gushing cash that must be paid out
Posted by T-Jon
Member since Jan 2012
148 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:53 pm to
[img]The ONLY reason price might be relevant is if you were looking to employ a covered call strategy on DVD stocks[/img]

I was thinking the same thing. I unfortunately have limits on unit price when selling options.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram