- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stocks or ETFs
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:11 pm to Mariner
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:11 pm to Mariner
quote:
quote:
How so? The etfs I use are just an easier way to buy into a mutual fund.
[quote]
You can say its a mutual fund, but they are a more concentrated one. An ETF may have 50 stocks while a mutual fund may have 500. Its a little more interesting.
This is not accurate. The etfs for the s&p500 are invested in the same 500 companies as the mutual funds. Same is true of other etfs that were created to represent mutual funds. There are etfs that are not intended to represent a mutual fund, so maybe that is what you are referring to.
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:33 pm to PLaneTiger
I'm about 85% funds/etf's and 15% individual stocks.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:41 pm to GentleJackJones
quote:
Individual stocks are just gambling to me. I really don't think most traders are digging into their financials, reports, board composition, etc
ALL investing is gambling. True that individual stocks are generally more risky. Groups of stocks add diversification that tends to lower the risk, but still have risk.
There are plenty of individual stocks that are fairly low risk during their runs. Bandwagon investing doesn't require a ton of research. Nvda is up over 100,000% for the past decade or so. Which is ridiculous. I am up 1000% by jumping in on a stock that everyone in the world could see was a good bet to continue to trend up. There are many similar stories. I think the majority of investors should have some individual stocks in their portfolio. I am probably 75-25, with 25% being in individual stocks, but they have definitely made good returns for me.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 1:26 pm to PLaneTiger
ETFs and mutual funds. Broad market. I do not trade stocks.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 2:55 pm to geauxpurple
I got so tired of picking winners and losers. It’s only ETFs from here on out.
VOO
VUG
VXUS
Those three are solid and most importantly consistent.
VOO
VUG
VXUS
Those three are solid and most importantly consistent.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 4:50 pm to PLaneTiger
Do you think you can successfully pick stocks that will exceed the after tax returns of the S&P 500 over long haul, when most professionals cannot?
If you have the secret sauce, individual stocks all day long.
In the case that you are more like most (including the professionals), the diversification and index focused investing may be your best way to go.
If looking for thrills, stick to casinos, online betting and prediction markets.
If looking to build financial freedom via wealth building, boring might be the way to go.
Good luck!
If you have the secret sauce, individual stocks all day long.
In the case that you are more like most (including the professionals), the diversification and index focused investing may be your best way to go.
If looking for thrills, stick to casinos, online betting and prediction markets.
If looking to build financial freedom via wealth building, boring might be the way to go.
Good luck!
Posted on 3/28/26 at 6:38 pm to PLaneTiger
A lot of people build the “core” with ETFs like VTI, VOO, QQQ, or SCHD, then use a few individual stocks (MSFT, NVDA, AMZN, etc.) as supplemental holdings if they want to overweight certain companies. It keeps things simple but still gives you room to be selective.
I like to use Tip Ranks and Stock Invest, along with the research functions in my Fidelity account, to evaluate future opportunities.
Either way, one thing that helps a lot of investors is dollar-cost averaging — putting in a set amount on a regular schedule. It smooths out the ups and downs, keeps emotions out of the process, and makes it easier to stay consistent over time.
I do that weekly for a set of ETFs no matter what the market is doing. I’m retired, so I keep things simple by dollar-cost averaging into broad, steady funds like FXAIX, CGDV, SPYI, and BKGI for stability and income, then keep a small amount in higher-growth names like IREN so I still have some upside without taking on unnecessary risk.
I like to use Tip Ranks and Stock Invest, along with the research functions in my Fidelity account, to evaluate future opportunities.
Either way, one thing that helps a lot of investors is dollar-cost averaging — putting in a set amount on a regular schedule. It smooths out the ups and downs, keeps emotions out of the process, and makes it easier to stay consistent over time.
I do that weekly for a set of ETFs no matter what the market is doing. I’m retired, so I keep things simple by dollar-cost averaging into broad, steady funds like FXAIX, CGDV, SPYI, and BKGI for stability and income, then keep a small amount in higher-growth names like IREN so I still have some upside without taking on unnecessary risk.
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 3/28/26 at 9:07 pm to PLaneTiger
Buy IVV every month. 30 years call me from your mansion
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:04 pm to Nole Man
quote:
SCHD
SCHG is way better.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 12:02 am to Paul Allen
quote:
SCHG is way better.
Don't really disagree for the long haul, have some actually.
SCHD is built for income and stability, SCHG is pure growth. Depends on what you want your portfolio to do.
Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a -13.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 16.57%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
This post was edited on 3/29/26 at 6:38 am
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:05 am to Mariner
quote:
You can say its a mutual fund, but they are a more concentrated one. An ETF may have 50 stocks while a mutual fund may have 500. Its a little more interesting.
quote:
ETF's are more safe but to me they are boring. Not that it is a bad thing. I have them along with individual stock.
There are high conviction mutual funds and the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF has 3,500 stocks. There are leveraged or inverse ETFs, which hardly qualify as boring. Your post makes no sense.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:50 am to Bdiddy
quote:
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF has 3,500 stocks
Rewind to 5 or so years ago...
Owning $10,000 spread across 3500 stocks vs NVIDIA. The thrill of seeing that one stock pop, explode, go down, explode again, the media coverage, the anticipated earnings updates, etc.
The ETF does great too, but its the thrill I am referring to. I am happy to see one of my ETF's succeed, but seeing that vs seeing something I take pride in individually owning like Trane, Generac, or American Express....the fun is seeing a chunk of money in individual stocks and how they perform.
ETF is like being a casual baseball fan liking a certain team for their history of success, stadium venue, and uniforms/colors but only knowing a basic concept of the format of the team. Individual stock is similar to following one or two players from that exact team, knowing all their intricate stats, cheering for them to succeed, keeping track of stats, and seeing that player break his season high of HR or RBI totals. Its much more interesting to track an individual player and his impact on the team's success than to just watch a general team win that you know little about.
ETF's are great don't get me wrong. All I am saying is that individual stocks to me are way more interesting to monitor and cheer for.
I use a few financial institutions. One is all about mutual funds and ETF's. The other is all about buying individual stock, although they do have a few mutual funds in my account. I have around 50 individual stocks with one institution. My first market check of the day starts with the institution with the individual stocks. Better yet, the institution with individual stock usually outperforms the institution with ETF's.
I enjoy individuals more, but I don't recommend just owning individual stock unless you are in a position to shrug your shoulders at a 30% loss and say lets sell it so I can reduce my tax burden.
Popular
Back to top

0






