
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spec Play - HGRAF
Posted on 10/14/26 at 7:30 pm to masoncj
Posted on 10/14/26 at 7:30 pm to masoncj
Have been on the sidelines of this thread monitoring for several months and I am thinking about starting a position here. Has anyone considered what would happen if they DON’T redom? Would that be like a straight to 0 scenario? Not trying to be mean seriously just curious if we think we are near a floor.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 9:55 pm to Saint5446
It would send it under a $1 for sure but as mentioned previously the patents for the production process will always have value IMHO.
Unless the world truly doesn’t adopt graphene at massive scale or it takes an inordinate amount of time for adoption.
Unless the world truly doesn’t adopt graphene at massive scale or it takes an inordinate amount of time for adoption.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:34 am to masoncj
Nasdaq has changed it's listing requirements. The under $4/share alternative listing options have been eliminated.
NASDAQ Requirements
This is good news and bad, I think. The good news is that they will have to do something to bump the stock price and can't rely on total market valuation with a lower stock price.
The bad news is that they are not there, yet, and have to get there.
NASDAQ Requirements
This is good news and bad, I think. The good news is that they will have to do something to bump the stock price and can't rely on total market valuation with a lower stock price.
The bad news is that they are not there, yet, and have to get there.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:25 am to Jax-Tiger
I'm going to bring this up again, in the context of this going to $1/share. If the redomicile doesn't happen, and or management drops the ball on this, causing the stock price to drop down to pennies, I would see a buyout happening, which would lift the stock price - hopefully to a level where we can make a few bucks.
I've actually brought it up before, that they may already have potential buyers in waiting. Recently, we've seen them focus on 1) redomicile, 2) R&D with customers, 3.) presenting at industry tradeshows and conventions, and 4) hire people with experience working with government agencies. What we haven't seen is progress towards actually manufacturing graphene to scale or list on the NASDAQ exchange. This could be good, if this is intentional.
It makes sense to redomicile before selling. The acquiring company would avoid the taxes to the Canadian government based on the sales price. This could explain why they chose to do an about face and focus on redomiciling, rather than focus on NASDAQ or production facility. It doesn't make sense to build a factory or list on NASDAQ, if you're going to sell, anyway. Sure, they signed a contract to buy acetylene, but they needed that for the lab they set up in Austin.
What makes the company valuable to a buyer is they have:
1) A fully functioning test lab
2) A pipeline of potential customers already testing and potentially already committed to buying graphene
3) A gas contract and production facility site already to build on and permits in place.
4) A potentially huge TAM
5) A patent moat in place
6) A product that has almost unlimited use cases
What is a company with those assets worth, even if they haven't made any sales, yet? Eleven figures? More or less?
I've actually brought it up before, that they may already have potential buyers in waiting. Recently, we've seen them focus on 1) redomicile, 2) R&D with customers, 3.) presenting at industry tradeshows and conventions, and 4) hire people with experience working with government agencies. What we haven't seen is progress towards actually manufacturing graphene to scale or list on the NASDAQ exchange. This could be good, if this is intentional.
It makes sense to redomicile before selling. The acquiring company would avoid the taxes to the Canadian government based on the sales price. This could explain why they chose to do an about face and focus on redomiciling, rather than focus on NASDAQ or production facility. It doesn't make sense to build a factory or list on NASDAQ, if you're going to sell, anyway. Sure, they signed a contract to buy acetylene, but they needed that for the lab they set up in Austin.
What makes the company valuable to a buyer is they have:
1) A fully functioning test lab
2) A pipeline of potential customers already testing and potentially already committed to buying graphene
3) A gas contract and production facility site already to build on and permits in place.
4) A potentially huge TAM
5) A patent moat in place
6) A product that has almost unlimited use cases
What is a company with those assets worth, even if they haven't made any sales, yet? Eleven figures? More or less?
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 8:28 am
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:09 am to Jax-Tiger
Yeah, I saw that. I think that’s very bad news. I don’t see any silver lining there. It would take 100% Pop from here to get to four dollars. The pop-up to eight dollars was completely irrational and drove by FOMO. We’re not going to get that a second time around.
Also I really don’t think Hydrograph is close on any “major” contracts
They have something with sparc under the LOI but I really think at this point they would’ve let other LOI come out if they were actually close
Again what a dumpster fire
Also I really don’t think Hydrograph is close on any “major” contracts
They have something with sparc under the LOI but I really think at this point they would’ve let other LOI come out if they were actually close
Again what a dumpster fire
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:11 am to Jax-Tiger
At this point, I would take a buyout
As you pointed out many times, KB and all the leadership has no skills whatsoever building out a huge manufacturing apparatus
As you pointed out many times, KB and all the leadership has no skills whatsoever building out a huge manufacturing apparatus
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:21 am to masoncj
Put in a stop loss at $1.40 - hope it doesn’t trigger
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:21 am to masoncj
quote:
Again what a dumpster fire
I don't think we know that yet.
The management team is silent. If they were panicking, they would be pumping the stock. Putting announcements out there in order to boost their own portfolio and to get it up to $4.
They haven't said anything, yet, except for trade show announcements.
Obviously, they know stuff we don't. If they are trying to avoid taxes, it all makes sense. If they have a verbal agreement to sell the company at a price dependent on customer pipeline, then it makes sense. I guess the last option is incompetence. If it were just Kjirstin, and a bunch of nobodies, I would probably not have any faith and would be looking for an exit. However, there are some very experienced people on her team that gave up higher paying jobs elsewhere to join Hydrograph.
Full disclosure: The majority of my shares are now in the long term capital gains category, so I'm actually still ahead, although not by much. I know this is tough for folks who are down a bunch. We know the redomicile will bump it up, but I'm more looking at what happens AFTER the redomicile. If we still get nothing, I'll probably start selling. I've held this long, I'm gonna wait and see how the next couple of months plays out.
If they aren't selling out, then the customer pipeline is the key to their future.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:22 am to Jax-Tiger
This seems like terrible news. I'm not sure what the play is now, other than to hope for a buyout.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:24 am to NaturalBeam
The stock market has been dishonest with us for years about true shareholder value. I think this is just yet another example of this. I think those who do not have a Roth IRA are fricked.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:24 am to Jax-Tiger
I thought the management team couldn’t do anything during this period trading wise.
That’s my understanding at least
That’s my understanding at least
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:39 am to masoncj
quote:
I thought the management team couldn’t do anything during this period trading wise.
That’s my understanding at least
You are correct. I was going to post that. They are in a quiet period once a public offering or registration process gets initiated. There will be no news until after October 29th, as I understand it. They cannot risk being seen as influencing the vote by making material announcements. I believe they can make announcements once the vote is completed.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 9:50 am to Jax-Tiger
Again, I hate beating a dead horse
But did the management team really not think for 6 to 8 weeks without any announcements that the stock would hold its value
Capital raises are almost always seen negatively
I just don’t understand the strategy or what they were thinking
The stock is a ship getting hit on all sides
I mean, they really don’t have any defense to help prop it up without legal questions
Very strange situation
But did the management team really not think for 6 to 8 weeks without any announcements that the stock would hold its value
Capital raises are almost always seen negatively
I just don’t understand the strategy or what they were thinking
The stock is a ship getting hit on all sides
I mean, they really don’t have any defense to help prop it up without legal questions
Very strange situation
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:11 am to masoncj
quote:
Very strange situation
Yes, but we don't know what their options were. This stock went 6 months of staying around $4/share with no material announcement. Then, right before redomicile, the event that everyone is waiting on, the bottom drops out.
Could the management team have miscalculated? They may have been figuring that the price held from March through August, surely it's not going to crater right before the redomicile vote is counted, is it?
Shorters came out of the woodworks, no announcements, and now all of the sudden, it's a shite stock, even though the story has not changed.
It is my understanding that the quiet period does not affect their ability to make factual announcements, such as a signed contract with SPARC or a ground breaking date in Bellville, but they can't make speculative announcements, such as they plan to sign contracts with 20 customers for a total of 1000 tons of graphene once the production is up and running in Bellville.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:41 am to lsudave1
I disagree. Solely have a Roth IRA account will not save you from economic recession. Don’t know what world you are living in
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:43 am to masoncj
quote:
Capital raises are almost always seen negatively
I just don’t understand the strategy or what they were thinking
The stock is a ship getting hit on all sides
True. I think they figured that the upcoming redomicile, coupled with a pending NASDAQ listing would offset the negativity. I remember when they had a capital raise about a year ago, and the stock price was around $2.50, if I recall. I sold half my shares on the announcement, figuring it would go down under $2 and I could rebuy my shares. I was shocked that it went down about 10 cents and then reversed course and went UP. I rebought at a couple of cents higher than what I had sold them for. Plus I had a tax bill. Still SMDH over that one.
Maybe the best case is a buyout at this point.
Another thing that makes Hydrograph attractive for a buyout by a huge company like Eastman, Dupont, or BASF, is that those companies have the resources to do the R&D to develop products they can patent for themselves, instead of just providing samples of graphene so that other companies can do the R&D and get the patents. HGRAF is filing for some patents, but I gotta feel that another company could really create a whole stable of patented products that could generate huge sales, without paying the 80% margin for the graphene.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:59 am to AlexGoldy
You are taking an antiquated stance on this matter. Yes, a Roth IRA is not enough, but with the way the market has fluctuated I think we need to start having the dreaded conversation about return on investment vs cost efficiency of investment.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:08 am to lsudave1
quote:
The stock market has been dishonest with us for years about true shareholder value. I think this is just yet another example of this. I think those who do not have a Roth IRA are fricked.
I'm not understanding your point on Roth accounts... care to explain
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:16 am to Jax-Tiger
And it’s officially under $2
Support looks really sketchy
Support looks really sketchy
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:43 am to masoncj
quote:
And it’s officially under $2
Support looks really sketchy
Yep. I still don't think it will go down to $1, but who knows?
Between this and NBIS, I'm just glad I don't have any margin balance to worry about.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 11:52 am

Popular
Back to top


1






