Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Selling an asset, Depreciation is taxable income?

Posted on 4/15/22 at 11:53 pm
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 4/15/22 at 11:53 pm
Short story.


Had a laundromat, bought it for $75k.

Depreciated assets (washers/dryers/etc) to the tune of $50k over 7 years.

Sold laundromat for 100k

Expecting to pay cap gains tax of on $25k

Accountant says I have to “income tax” from the sale of $75k

Seems wrong, why is it not at cap gains rate?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25617 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 5:08 am to
Im no accountant.

But you depreciated against taxable income for all those years.

Now you have received the taxable income back with the sale of the asset.

You arent claiming the gain.
You are claiming the depreciation back.
Posted by CherokeeTiger
Member since Jan 2011
610 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 5:35 am to
Your accountant is right.

The depreciation reduced your basis to $25,000. You’ve been getting tax deductions for it this whole time.

The depreciation is “recaptured” as ordinary income up to the amount of the gain on sale. You should have $50,000 of ordinary gain and $25,000 of 1231 gain which is taxed at the capital gains rates.
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 7:44 am to


Posted by Tigerlandlegend2000
LAPLACE
Member since Jan 2022
9 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 9:53 am to
He/she is right but dude dont let it go without verifying your sales agreement. No one pays more for depreciable assets so that large of gain is wild on equipment. Make sure the proceeds are not allocated to goodwill as well. If so, that's cap gain rates for goodwill. IE - diff between fair market value of equipment and sales price.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25617 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 11:02 am to
I presume the laundromat included the real estate. Not just the equipment. I presume the gain is on everything.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17478 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 11:20 am to
Land is not depreciated?
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46192 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 12:10 pm to
It’s kind of like a true up in a way.

You took ordinary expense for “depreciation”. Turns out the asset didn’t depreciate as much as you said it did so you pick up ordinary income to make up for the expense you took.

If you sell the asset for more than you bought it for, then the amount in excess of your cost will be capital gain.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71133 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Land is not depreciated?


Nope.

Buildings are due to wear and tear, but land doesn't get used up.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36116 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 7:23 pm to
My perception is too many people claim the tax benefits of depreciation without understanding the potential of a big capital gains tax penalty in the future. Which is not to say that they shouldn't consider the deduction.. but if your tax bill is likely to be larger in the future then you should be more reluctant.
Posted by iknowmorethanyou
Paydirt
Member since Jul 2007
6548 posts
Posted on 4/16/22 at 8:40 pm to
Good thing you have an accountant.

Posted by Niner
Member since Apr 2019
2026 posts
Posted on 4/17/22 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Accountant says I have to “income tax” from the sale of $75k
As long as he/she isn't saying the entire thing is ordinary income then yes, that is correct.

If I had a nickel for every time I had to ruin someone's day on this topic...and I'm not even a CPA.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45772 posts
Posted on 4/17/22 at 8:52 am to
I think I understand where he is coming from. He paid $75k for a business that included $50k in depreciable assets.

Now, the business is sold for $100k with assets that are valued at $0.

If he called out a $1000 of value as an asset to the buyer in the purchase documentation, and the buyer was cool with that, would he not owe only ordinary income on the $1000, and capital gains on $74k of increased business value?
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46192 posts
Posted on 4/18/22 at 12:23 am to
quote:

If he called out a $1000 of value as an asset to the buyer in the purchase documentation, and the buyer was cool with that, would he not owe only ordinary income on the $1000, and capital gains on $74k of increased business value?

Usually there’s a purchase price allocation that both the buyer and seller have to agree to and file matching forms with the IRS.

Buyer wants more allocated to Fixed assets (more depreciation to take). Seller wants less allocated to Fixed assets (less depreciation recapture and thus ordinary income).

But yes that’s how it works. Most I see are based on Book Value of the asset.
This post was edited on 4/18/22 at 12:24 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram