Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Roth IRA for Emergency Fund

Posted on 12/11/19 at 6:13 pm
Posted by Downtown Devin Brown
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2013
1523 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 6:13 pm
What are some cons to utilizing a Roth IRA as an emergency fund rather than a savings account? My wife and I both have employer 401ks that offer very low fees, so the Roth IRA would be a supplement to our normal retirement savings.

Pros are obviously being able to withdraw contributions at any time, all while having my money growing (would likely have a moderate risk allocation).

Apologies if this topic has already been covered.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35331 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 6:27 pm to
Because you could need that money following a prolonged economic downturn which would mean you'd be taking out at the worst possible time. Hopefully your investments didn't take a big hit.
Posted by Popths
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
3965 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 7:39 pm to
I keep my emergency fund liquid.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39582 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:39 pm to
Depends on how much money you have.

If you can fund the ROTH and emergency fund then do that.

If you only have say, $4,000 after 401k contributions, you should put it in the ROTH and just keep it in a money market or similar investment. You can have access to the money within a few days.

Reason being is every year you don't contribute to the ROTH you have an opportunity cost of getting preferential tax treatment.

Later on in life if you make more money, you can just change that money market investment into more aggressive allocation.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 8:43 pm
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17995 posts
Posted on 12/12/19 at 7:51 am to
I have thought about this a few times and the following were the main issues I have with it:

1) Dark days requiring an emergency fund (like being unemployed) are more likely to happen during down economies. The odds are higher you'll be pulling money out at the worst time and lose money.

2) Due to IRA yearly limits, you can't put the money back. There is no way to catch back up.

3) "Emergency" funds could very well be dire emergencies. If it is an actual emergency fund, cash seems to be the only sensible option for immediate use in an emergency. If it is just a rainy day fund, then maybe not being cash is less of an issue.

Just some things to consider, IMO.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17478 posts
Posted on 12/12/19 at 8:41 am to
No one should focus on having what's called an "emergency fund". Negative connotation and very Dave Ramsey-esque.

Keep liquid funds in checking, savings, money market, cash value life policies, CD, etc., liquid for whatever reason, especially opportunity. There's a very rare emergency ever, unless you think buying new tires or a washing machine an "emergency". Too much drama being marketed by charlotans out there.

Having to access marketable securities has a time element involved. So Roth, no so liquid.


Eta: And the emotonal downvotes ensue. Sorry for your distress.
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Downtown Devin Brown
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2013
1523 posts
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:07 am to
quote:

1) Dark days requiring an emergency fund (like being unemployed) are more likely to happen during down economies. The odds are higher you'll be pulling money out at the worst time and lose money.

2) Due to IRA yearly limits, you can't put the money back. There is no way to catch back up.

3) "Emergency" funds could very well be dire emergencies. If it is an actual emergency fund, cash seems to be the only sensible option for immediate use in an emergency. If it is just a rainy day fund, then maybe not being cash is less of an issue.


1) Luckily me and my wife work in very safe fields. Even in the darkest days of my industry, my employer (government) used the opportunity to hire up.

2) "catching back up" seems to not be that important since it is not my main retirement account. It would just be a supplement to my 401k and pension.

3) This seems to be the biggest draw that I can see. Although I'm having trouble thinking of examples of emergencies where CASH is needed instantly.

Maybe my biggest issue in seeing the magnitude of the "cons" is defining "emergency".
Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 12/12/19 at 11:44 am to
Twice in the last 15 years I utilized the 90 day no penalty for early withdraw from a Roth mutual fund.
Obviously the money isn’t making money while it’s not in the account and depending on the funds price when you took the money out compared to when you put it back in there.
One time I had broken an ankle and the other was after some hurricane damage. I replaced all the funds before the 90 days was up but I’ve always considered it a back up plan of sorts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram