Started By
Message

re: Retirement goal and how to get there: looking for advice / opinions

Posted on 7/7/25 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 12:54 pm to
It's very conservative. Show your math.

The historical return of VOO, for example, is 13.4%. Given that average one could still easily take out 6% and still be growing their money.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
52923 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:08 pm to
We've also been in a bull market for the better part of 16 years. I don't know if it would be prudent to expect those types of returns for the next 16 in retirement.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:17 pm to
No disagreement here but the 4% rule is from 1994. It just might be time to look at statistics and make an adjustment rather than just saying "negative". Not to you but show the math. Since the rule was proposed (it's a guideline, not a rule) that market has averaged 9% despite some bad years.

30 year average is a decent basis to debunk the rule.
Posted by Naked Bootleg
Premium Plus® Member
Member since Jul 2021
3156 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Hoping those expenses would be lower by retirement age…. No way would I retire with $6500/mth debt….


What all bills we talking?


Healthcare, utilities, food, country club, vehicle maintenance, maybe a small mortgage payment < $1k.

We will use $340k-ish equity in current home and downsize in a new home. Someone else said ~$7k is conservative. I need to do more research on expected monthly costs in retirement.
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 1:21 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135281 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

The historical return of VOO, for example, is 13.4%
VOO simply tracks the S&P and was formed at a market nadir in 2010. Had it been formed 10yrs earlier, its historical return would be 5.4%.

Look, I'm not trying to be a "nattering nabob of negativism." If we were talking about someone in their 40's instead of late 50's, this would be a different conversation. But we aren't, so it isn't.

The OP may be inexperienced enough to take your VOO historical return as a forward looking performance assumption, rather than buckling down on current finances, and pushing resultant savings into a portfolio.

Is it possible though that putting everything in VOO could yield 16%/yr x 7yrs w/o any major pullbacks? Sure. It's definitely possible.
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

I need to do more research on expected monthly costs in retirement


I've done a lot of research on this. #1 is probably what state you will live in as quite a few states are tax beneficial to retirees (Georgia really hits its' stride after you turn 65).

Focus on tax burden first as other than medical expenses it can be the biggest cash outflow unless you have a mortgage.

Calculator.net has excellent calculators you can play around with for various investments, retirement payouts, etc.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:28 pm to
Fair enough and no offense taken at all. It's a discussion more people need to have and research. Other than the occassional trolls I greatly appreciate the input of those that frequent this board.
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 1:31 pm
Posted by xBirdx
Member since Sep 2018
2181 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:31 pm to
Just seems high to me, but idk.

Im estimating my expenses right now ( inflation, I know) to be like $4k all in on the high side

1 auto loan (hopefully not but farrowing in, utilities, food, normal entertainment, eating out, insurance, taxes on home)
Posted by xBirdx
Member since Sep 2018
2181 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:32 pm to
So what’s the updated rule of thumb?
Posted by Naked Bootleg
Premium Plus® Member
Member since Jul 2021
3156 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

VABuckeye


Thank you.

We've been looking at eastern Tennessee (Chatt; Johnson City) but northern Georgia interests us too.

Upon quick look, I see what you mean re: Georgia.

quote:

Georgia does not tax Social Security retirement benefits and provides a maximum deduction of $65,000 per person on all types of retirement income for anyone 65 or older. The state’s sales tax rates and property tax rates are both relatively moderate. Georgia has no inheritance or estate taxes.


smartasset.com
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

So what’s the updated rule of thumb?


Depends on your tolerance, right? For me, I think 6% won't be a problem.
Posted by tigerbacon
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2010
4449 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 1:54 pm to
6-7k a month is insane in retirement. To put it in perspective I am 40 and when I retire the only bill besides utilities I will have is property tax. I am also expecting to have 20kish a month coming in combined me and my wife.
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
4991 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

There is a reason for the standard disclaimer: "Past performance does not guarantee future results."



And that would be exactly why I posted that same exact sentence in my post. Thanks for repeating it.

quote:

E.g., QQQ 10-Year Annualized Return March 2000–March 2010 was negative @ –5.3% per year! You're doing well to point out the rosey assumptions I addressed.


The S&P returned -14.4% from 2000-2010.

If you want to cherry pick a time frame that includes The 2000-2002 and 2008 crashes as your base model we should conclude that everyone will lose at least 5% of their investments, correct?

QQQ's 20 year return is 14.17%. That's pretty stable and it's not even an ETF that I love. Should you coun't on a pullback? Sure. Should you model in the two biggest crashes of the last 35 years? Probably not.
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 2:10 pm
Posted by xBirdx
Member since Sep 2018
2181 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:02 pm to
Yea.. hoping least as possible lol

I think I can work with 4%, as I’ll have a couple hundred k in cash as well
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135281 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

If you want to cherry pick a time frame
Au contraire. The question is, looking forward, what actually are the cherries being picked? E.g., In midst of the dot.com boom, one might not have had a decade of negative market performance on their radar screen.

quote:

If you think that ETFs are high risk, maybe the market isn't the place for your money.
Oooh cuz, you have no idea how dumb you'd feel IRL making that statement

Maybe take your sassy sauce to another board.
Posted by GrapevineTigah
Grapevine, Texas
Member since Dec 2003
46 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:19 pm to
I just retired in February. Recommendations:
Eliminate or reduce debt, as much as possible.
Have a plan for medical coverage before 65.
4% rule is outstanding.
Your investments may track the last 17 or so years, or we may have another October '87, 1999, or housing crisis. Interest rates will impact you more in retirement because you'll want to be more conservative with investments.
Have emergency funds: You never know when the roof needs repair, the A/C goes out, a car repair or replacement is needed.
Understand what you like to do with your time: trips can cost money, but some are very inexpensive. Eating out costs. Will your habits change?
I started looked at expense ratios for funds like Fidelity Contra. I also noticed that a lot of funds/ETFs were invested in Netflix/AMZN/GOOG/MSFT/NVIDIA, etc and started looking elsewhere.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2893 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:28 pm to
Updated rule of thumb according to Bengen's research and model is 4.7%
Some of you aren't accounting for sequence of returns risk. If market is down in first years of retirement withdrwals you rapidly deplete nest egg.
Also seem to be falling for recency bias assuming returns will keep up w current tend not hold to historic norms. If anything, recent positive trend and high stock valuations by P/E etc. may be be more likely to portend a higher likelihood of market correction.
Thus 6% is a higher risk withdrwal rate than typically reccomended.
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
4991 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Au contraire. The question is, looking forward, what actually are the cherries being picked? E.g., In midst of the dot.com boom, one might not have had a decade of negative market performance on their radar screen.



Serious question, what is your recommendation then? If you are in the market you assume risk, that's part of the game. Looking forward, where's your money going if you want/need to turnover percentage for the next 7-10 years. Include all the doom and gloom that you'd like.

Snarkiness aside, I am open to the education.

Posted by Naked Bootleg
Premium Plus® Member
Member since Jul 2021
3156 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

6-7k a month is insane in retirement. To put it in perspective I am 40 and when I retire the only bill besides utilities I will have is property tax. I am also expecting to have 20kish a month coming in combined me and my wife.


I listed "vehicle maintenance" - OT Ballers' 40 foot yachts don't maintain themselves, baw (kidding)

I am estimating how much we'd pay for healthcare.

How much should I expect to pay for me & wife's health/vision/dental?


eta: question to all; not tigerbacon
This post was edited on 7/7/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24651 posts
Posted on 7/7/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I'm not well-versed, but I don't like the idea of hiring a money manager.


At age 56 it is not a bad idea. There is a lot of smart people here, some are even financial advisors themselves, at the end of the day there is peace of mind sitting down with someone with paper in front of you and charting out the rest of your life. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive



We did a financial advisor a couple of years ago and I personally feel more confident of our end game now being successful.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram