Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Grapevine, Texas
Biography:1985 LSU Grad
Interests:
Occupation:Retired Software Engineer
Number of Posts:60
Registered on:12/30/2003
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
re: The economy is figuring the tariff situation out.

One of the commentators on CNBC yesterday pointed out that the relative success of the economy despite the tariffs seems to make the democrats' tax/spend case for them.

re: Why not play Harden.

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 2/19/26 at 4:55 pm to
You're right. At bats have been lost. The positive side of that is Jay is seeing lots of good things from those that have gotten chances. A lot of years the bats don't heat up until the weather does.
Seems like the s and the a in your name might be reversed.
If this was the Money board, or Bogleheads, the absolute answer is hell no. Buy a vehicle that is one or two on consumer reports for quality, then drive it until the wheels fall off. Pay cash, no extended warranty. Then 10 years or more down the road do it again. If you have to have a vehicle that will in all likelihood break down, rethink that logic.
I try to pay cash, or pay off the loan asap. I've had 2 Toyota Camry vehicles that each lasted 17 years. My current fake truck is 9+ years old. I use the term fake truck because it's a Honda Ridgeline. That works for me but if I needed to drive off-road it probably wouldn't work. I have avoided the high dollar purchases because I had to drive a bit to work, and I value being able to get my kids through college, afford to retire, etc. I've kept a good emergency fund that I've used to buy a vehicle when needed. I've seen others get rid of vehicles at 100k miles but 200k + has been the norm recently without significant repair bills. The only exception was a Chrysler Van when the kids were little. I also value the vehicles that have high resale value over time, on consumer reports.
Sounds like you got it figured out. I retired about a year ago with very similar objectives. It's worked so far! :cheers:

re: VZ Verizon stock purchase

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 2/3/26 at 4:54 pm to
I bought in October of 2025 also. I'm up 15% plus dividends. The reason I bought it was as a defensive stock, with the market in what I considered overbought territory. Worst case I get the solid dividend and wait for the high fliers to drop. It's outperforming the QQQ. It's clear we have lots of traders on this board. I'm retired so the goal is to not lose. I also bought CHV and ABBV around that time and have seen similar results. :cheers:

re: No grace at wbb game?

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 12/29/25 at 6:03 am to
Thanks for asking JB. I was curious too. I really love watching this team. The hustle, chemistry, and selflessness are amazing. They may not win it all but it if they don't it won't be for a lack of effort. :geauxtigers:
I was a boy scout. Our troop members were ushers at the games in the mid 70's. I got to sit on the steps in spilled drinks, but I was in Tiger Stadium! I remember TigerVision and watched (or listened) to away games any way I could. When I moved to Texas in 1986 I bought a 32 inch TV with rabbit ears to watch Dale Brown's final four team. It was sitting on the floor because I had no furniture. :geauxtigers:
Sounds like we have a thing or two in common. I retired this year, though at 62:
- spend less than you are earning in retirement income, generally (December should always be an exception)
- spend some time outdoors every day
- exercise
- meet others as frequently as possible
- listen more (especially to the "other side"). I can't stand today's identity politics. Too much name calling
- turn off 24 hour news. Be careful on social media
- Say yes, more often. When invited just go (until it becomes a commitment that you don't want yet)
- add more volunteer work over time (church, neighborhood, city, county)
- Lots of opportunities to ride bikes, walk, play golf, pickleball, help neighbors ->get engaged in some with others
Because LK's job change exposes the problem with College Football today. Few enforced rules. It's wild west, all about money. The portal window and signing dates make no sense with regard to when coaches can "move up". As Verge said, he's doing what makes sense for LSU. If the higher level organization (NCAA/CFB) wants to improve things, they'll rethink the early recruiting window, the portal dates, and have some rules on timing of coaching changes.
Don't usually want anyone on the team (including coaches) to learn a totally new system for just one game. That energy for non-interim coaches might better be spent preparing for the long term answers.

re: Offensive Line

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 11/30/25 at 4:38 pm to
In the recent past this may have been true/accurate. With NIL, injuries, and players going to the NFL after 3 years that is likely no longer a valid assumption.
Yes, I would consider a heavy cash position to be an obvious bet against the market. BRK also likes to invest in businesses with solid cash flow and minimal speculation.

re: Advice on future investing

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 11/6/25 at 10:50 am to
Sounds like you're doing great! Congrats! Index funds are the way to go. Since you're young this may not matter as much, but roughly 35% of each of VOO, VTSAX, and BEQGX are in NVDA, AVGO, GOOG/L, AMZN, APPL, MSFT, and META. So, the historical diversification of such funds is up to debate.
Compelling? He doesn't say how he's going to do it. I would say not realistic. If he can get 12% per year for 25 years, he should be managing Warren Buffett's money.
Fidelity shows a 7.24% return for the life of FFFEX, with higher recent returns. The question should (for retirement planning purposes) be what are the expectations moving forward? I wouldn't expect to match that return (in a target fund or otherwise) as the last 10 years have been historically good for the stock market.
You're right. The likelihood of passing away early needs to be considered, along with whether or not a spouse would get death benefits. That is also a situation where the "reality" of 1k a month benefits needs to be considered. Maybe the benefits are less for a surviving spouse. I'm getting a pension where I took less for the survivor benefits case. If the OP's parents lived to be 100 or passed away in their 50's that may matter too.
My math and assumptions need to be checked, but I would think about it like this: 30k now or 12k a year in 25 years? I use the 4% assumption quite a lot, ignoring the current lower interest rate bias to address the hypothetical question. That means you'll have $1200 of income (4% of 30k) now vs $12000 income (1k a month) in 25 years. So another way of phrasing the question is would you think an IRA could be used to grow that 30k by ten times in 25 years? Many projections show SP500 growth of 5 to 7% over the next 10 years. So assuming 6% growth your 30k would double every 12 years (rule of 72). In 24 years at the same rate your 30k invested in the SP500 in an IRA would be a little over $120k. That would only earn you $4800 a year in income. I'd go with the state retirement plan if the 1k a month in 25 years is real. :cheers:

re: Somebody knows Something

Posted by GrapevineTigah on 11/3/25 at 5:22 am to
This has to be an "I'm running for governor" moment. :cheers:
He knows that when he goes folks will sell shares. Then BRK can buy it back cheaply and they'll have lots of cash on hand. They'll also be able to be "greedy when there's blood in the streets". I think that was one of his quotes.