Started By
Message

re: Pay off house vs invest.

Posted on 5/2/23 at 2:35 pm to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21414 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 2:35 pm to
I dont know anybody who paid off a mortgage that said they wished they had kept the mortgage.
Posted by Motownsix
Boise
Member since Oct 2022
3143 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 4:03 pm to
The argument comes up frequently. I’m not debt adverse depending on rates. I don’t seek to rid myself of mortgages right now.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
38887 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

I dont know anybody who paid off a mortgage that said they wished they had kept the mortgage.


He an historically good interest rate that would pay him more to invest it in even the most conservative stocks / bonds.

Do not pay that mortgage off a day earlier than it needs to be
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 8:17 pm to
With a 2.875%, I would invest it. Even if it was higher, and thus a better return, the issue is always that until it’s either paid off, sold, recasted (if allowed), re-financed (going to be hard to beat that rate anytime soon), or you take out a HELOC or loan (which defeats the purpose), any of that Etta paid down is inaccessible/illiquid. Your payments don’t decrease (unless recasted or refinance) until it’s paid off.

That said, some people insist that it gives them peace of mind, plus it’s a guaranteed return (but you can get better guaranteed returns with interest rates higher). So clearly some find it useful to put more towards it. In that case, I think it’s good to not think of it at as an either/or. So you can both invest some and put the rest towards the mortgage.
Posted by Woolfpack
Member since Jun 2021
1500 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 8:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/24 at 8:55 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Peace of mind is worth more than a sliding stock market.


You can put that $300k into a government money market account at 4.5% that’s fully liquid.

Peace of mind is making 100% sound financial decisions, and paying off your sub 3% mortgage is asinine.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15859 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 8:58 pm to
Mixed opinions. A home is an investment. I could’ve gotten 3.5% a couple of years ago but paid cash. I had a goal at 40ish to own my home outright.

Now I’m building wealth in investments and savings as I have zero debt (no mortgage, car payments, etc). Basically 60-70% of my paycheck goes there.

I understand the other arguments, but I personally like the security. If shite hit the fan, or I got laid off, my month to month expenses are next to nothing. More importantly my family is safe if something were to happen to me.

It’s a judgement call. For me, I like the piece of mind. Like I also said, your home is an investment that will continue to appreciate so not a bad place to be stashing it.
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 9:05 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

I understand the other arguments, but I personally like the security. If shite hit the fan, or I got laid off, my month to month expenses are next to nothing. More importantly my family is safe if something were to happen to me. It’s a judgement call. For me, I like the piece of mind. Like I also said, your home is an investment that will continue to appreciate so not a bad place to be stashing it.


I’ll never understand this argument from an unemotional standpoint. If you got laid off, having $300k in cash and a peanuts mortgage rate would be a lot more valuable than having $300k in equity in a home, particularly in this rate environment.
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 9:30 pm
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15859 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:14 pm to
I’m not a financial expert and wasn’t raised being taught anything about it.

Just makes more sense to me to not have debt. Not saying the smart guys can distribute things to work the best.

Most people know nothing about managing debt and counter investing so most of the the time it’s a bad decision.

I’m a simple man, works for me.
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12964 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:22 pm to
That’s the thing. People can’t grasp the concept of good debt is used as leverage to make even more money.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15859 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

People can’t grasp the concept of good debt is used as leverage


Exactly. That’s why it’s best to not have debt. You know how many arse bags I’ve known that took out low interest loans or ram up low interest credit card debt because some dickwad salesman told them they can make more interest on investing the money….then they either spend it on stupid crap, never invest it properly, or go to the casino?

Pay your shite off if you have the chance!
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Most people know nothing about managing debt and counter investing so most of the the time it’s a bad decision.


I agree here, somewhat. The decision to pay off a mortgage or go to the casino is obviously a bad decision, but that doesn’t change the fact that the debt itself is not the problem.
quote:

I’m not a financial expert and wasn’t raised being taught anything about it. Just makes more sense to me to not have debt. Not saying the smart guys can distribute things to work the best.


I came on a little strong but it’s a topic I’m pretty passionate about.

Like I tell people (and it’s not as simple as this analogy but hear me out):

Would you take $300k and tie it up for 30 years for less than 3%?

Of course not, so why pay off the mortgage?
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 11:22 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Exactly. That’s why it’s best to not have debt.


I mean it’s objectively better to have a sub 4% mortgage right now. It’s not even debatable.

The average Joe being financially illiterate doesn’t change the facts.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15859 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:40 pm to
I get you, bud. I think it’s about being smart in your individual situation. My wife has been a stay at home mom, and a great one, for the last few years, but no real corporate skills.

I’d hate for something to happen to me and she has leaches come around and she’s in a situation with strategically distributed debt vs investments to try and figure out.

She’ll have a nice, paid for home, no debt, and a nice cushion in savings/investments to go with from there. Her decisions from that point.

Piece of mind…at least for me.
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 9:44 pm
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12964 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Exactly. That’s why it’s best to not have debt.


I disagree. I do think the majority of America is too stupid to understand how to use debt to their advantage, which are the assbags you know that change their spending habits because they think credit makes them rich. If you don’t view credit like an extension of your bank account then credit isn’t for you. If you let a salesman convince you to buy shite you don’t need, that’s on you. Don’t hate the game, hate the stupid assbag playa.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
12210 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:51 pm to
"I’d hate for something to happen to me and she has leaches come around and she’s in a situation with strategically distributed debt to try and figure out"
--

That's what a cheap term life insurance policy is for.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15859 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 9:59 pm to
Not arguing. There’s great arguments for or against, but you give me an opportunity to pay off debt, I’ll take it every time…and I have.

Best of luck to everyone on their beliefs and strategies. It’s all about situation and mental comfort.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2274 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

I’m not a financial expert and wasn’t raised being taught anything about it.

Don’t take this the wrong way, but I wasn’t either — my folks thought a lot like you.

Emotions and peace of mind have cost me more than any bad habit or hobby.
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 11:03 pm
Posted by beaverfever
Arkansas
Member since Jan 2008
35461 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 6:00 am to
quote:

2.875/ ~26 years left.
quote:

300k
I'd take this bad boy off your hands if I could.

But seriously, don't even think about paying it off. If you have no idea what else to do with the money, put it all in a 5 year CD, pay your house off when the CD matures and buy your kid a car with the additional interest you'll make. That's worst case scenario.
This post was edited on 5/3/23 at 6:09 am
Posted by Grinder
Member since Nov 2007
2486 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 6:27 am to
If you had a fully paid off house, would you take out a $300K HELOC at 3% and put that money in a MMF?

That’s the same scenario worked in reverse.

The same logic can me used to determine whether to sell a stock or continue to hold it.

I’ve never heard someone say they wish they still had their mortgage.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram