- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nebius - NBIS - AI Infrastructure Company
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:56 am to Jax-Tiger
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:56 am to Jax-Tiger
I meant to post this question last week when we were discussing NBIS's core business, and that they are not the same as CRWV - they are not trying to build their core business around renting GPUs.
So what does their "core client" look like? I'm assuming that they need clients that are big enough to spend money, but still need the system/environment support to meet their needs - and they have been talking about security, integration, HIPAA, different levels of SOX compliance, and local governance.
To make another assumption, does that mean their client base is going to be health care providers and insurance companies who can jump into an AI develpment system that is already secure and HIPAA compliant. They will work with IT consulting firms who can develop client software in an environment that is already SOX compliant. They will provide a secure environment with the tools to develop AI systems for manufacturing companies of any size. They will be going after banks and accounting firms because their security and compliance with local/regional regulations is already baked into the system.
Does that cover it? They don't necessarily need Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, etc, to buy their services. They are trying to position themselves to get the rest of the AI market by developing data centers that are more user friendly and secure than anything else out there.
tldr: NBIS is looking to clients like BoA, Accenture, GM, UNH, etc, instead of the hyperscalers, by providing AI environments that are more user friendly for these companies. Hyperscalers are just the icing on the cake.
So what does their "core client" look like? I'm assuming that they need clients that are big enough to spend money, but still need the system/environment support to meet their needs - and they have been talking about security, integration, HIPAA, different levels of SOX compliance, and local governance.
To make another assumption, does that mean their client base is going to be health care providers and insurance companies who can jump into an AI develpment system that is already secure and HIPAA compliant. They will work with IT consulting firms who can develop client software in an environment that is already SOX compliant. They will provide a secure environment with the tools to develop AI systems for manufacturing companies of any size. They will be going after banks and accounting firms because their security and compliance with local/regional regulations is already baked into the system.
Does that cover it? They don't necessarily need Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, etc, to buy their services. They are trying to position themselves to get the rest of the AI market by developing data centers that are more user friendly and secure than anything else out there.
tldr: NBIS is looking to clients like BoA, Accenture, GM, UNH, etc, instead of the hyperscalers, by providing AI environments that are more user friendly for these companies. Hyperscalers are just the icing on the cake.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 8:01 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:07 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Does that cover it? They don't necessarily need Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, etc, to buy their services. They are trying to position themselves to get the rest of the AI market by developing data centers that are more user friendly and secure than anything else out there.
Correct, and while the big revenue from a hyperscaler is great, it comes at a cost, as the larger deals typically have much smaller margins, especially if the hyperscaler is going to resell that space under their own offering.
Microsoft deal was also good, because it will be used for MS internal teams, not resold. This is typically better margins and a much better use case to share with potential clients.
The other big difference maker, is the products and services they offer outside of just infrastructure. This allows them to be much more scalable, enticing to smaller clients, more efficient with each chip, less ramp up time and more productive from the same footprint.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 8:08 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:17 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:
So what does their "core client" look like?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Twitter Link Twitter Link
Twitter Link
Twitter Link
Twitter Link
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:17 am to bayoubengals88
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:17 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Correct, and while the big revenue from a hyperscaler is great, it comes at a cost, as the larger deals typically have much smaller margins, especially if the hyperscaler is going to resell that space under their own offering.
I just thought it was a good point to bring up, as we should not get caught up in the giant hyperscaler contracts. Just because they haven't inked a few more deals with those guys doesn't mean they aren't killing it.
They are building their business by differentiating themselves from companies who are just leasing bare metal. That means clients that are not pure AI, but need AI to make their core businesses better.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:18 am to bayoubengals88
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:21 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:I try not to use this buzz word, but... 100%
I just thought it was a good point to bring up, as we should not get caught up in the giant hyperscaler contracts. Just because they haven't inked a few more deals with those guys doesn't mean they aren't killing it.
I've been trying to get to the bottom of this over the last week or so the best I can:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 8:22 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:23 am to bayoubengals88
Good stuff.
All of those companies are using AI, but don't have the expertise/money to develop AI models on their own.
Nebius gives them a sandbox that works on day one.
All of those companies are using AI, but don't have the expertise/money to develop AI models on their own.
Nebius gives them a sandbox that works on day one.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:40 am to Jax-Tiger
Fighting 123 currently
Edit: Just blew through it
Edit: Just blew through it
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 8:43 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:45 am to IT_Dawg
You wealthy MF'er!!
Show me those 10/31s
Show me those 10/31s
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:47 am to bayoubengals88
Up 75% on the 10/31s I bought, can’t imagine IT’s day today
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:49 am to YungBuck
They are busting the doors down on NBI$.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:50 am to bayoubengals88
You still confident on $500 PT in the next 2-3yrs?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:53 am to YungBuck
I sold my call I rolled last Friday and was up 86%. Good recoupment on my initial 140c I had purchased on 10/10 and a good lesson learned on rolling calls!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:56 am to bayoubengals88
Sold 125/200 in the 3.50-$4.05 range when price was $124. Waiting for a pullback to reload for the afternoon run to $127
Hoping to get back in the $120.50-$121 price range.
Hoping to get back in the $120.50-$121 price range.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:59 am to sonoma8
quote:Have you seen my valuation posts?! YES
You still confident on $500 PT in the next 2-3yrs?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:00 am to sonoma8
quote:Recent discussion: Posted by bayoubengals88 on 10/25/25 at 12:07 pm to LChama
You still confident on $500 PT in the next 2-3yrs?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:06 am to bayoubengals88
Jumped right over my very generous offer in 11/21 140c. 
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:18 am to IT_Dawg
Okay, hopped back in at $2.55 when price hit $121.25 now at 240 contracts for 10/31 $130c
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:21 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:21 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
Jumped right over my very generous offer in 11/21 140c.
Should have gotten filled on this dip to $121
Think she is filling some daily gaps from all that volume, so we could see some slippage for a bit here, but I’m still playing for $125+ to end the day
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:29 am
Popular
Back to top


2





