- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSUS Online MBA Reviews
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to BTX722
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to BTX722
Acct 701
Well @zachtiger, I now know what you mean.
12 out of 12 on the practice. 10 out 12 on the Assessment. The two questions I missed were not to be found in the reading. I can only assume if I had an Accounting background, then maybe I would have known.
Thomas
Well @zachtiger, I now know what you mean.
12 out of 12 on the practice. 10 out 12 on the Assessment. The two questions I missed were not to be found in the reading. I can only assume if I had an Accounting background, then maybe I would have known.
Thomas
2
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:32 pm to thomasbowen
Exactly @thomasbowen!! And that was what was frustrating- no matter the amount of studying you do, hes always going to trip you up by some trickery instead of just testing what was taught. I’m glad for y’all it’s now 12 questions so you can get an 83% for 10/12. When I took him, it was 9 questions, so if you missed his 2 trick questions, you would get a 77%!! I called him out several times for asking questions using terms that weren’t even in the text. Everybody loves him because of his availability and zoom sessions (which is great) but I wasn’t a fan. I ended up with an A, but busted my a$$ to get it ( and my 18 year career is in finance / accounting from managerial level and above) so I should have made an easy A! Not in his class. Be prepared to bomb his final, everybody did and he ended up putting a big curve in place at the end because of it. Also, the timed nature of the test, and some long processed problems make it difficult at times. Good Luck! Attend his zoom or watch them as he always gives hints about some of the trick questions that will be on the test.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 6:37 pm to zachtiger
By the way- I definitely feel for y’all that don’t have an accounting background. I can tell you firsthand, that without my accounting and finance background, I would have gotten a C or worse in that class – no doubt.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 8:43 pm to zachtiger
I highly HIGHLY recommend Huang for Acct 701. No tricks whatsoever, minimal amount of studying because she really prepares you for the class. After reading so many negative comments about other teachers, I can't stress enough how good Huang is. Straightfoward, no tricks, an easy final project (although I was confused at first because it seemed TOO easy), and an easy 5% extra credit. I ended her class with a 100% (because I did the extra credit just in case).
I'll post an updated review on my last two classes shortly.
I'll post an updated review on my last two classes shortly.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:00 pm to baroqen
FIN 701 – Choi
In one phrase – “Finance made… not easy… but easier”
Difficulty – 4
Comments – Finance is tough. It’s boring, there are a ton of numbers and weird theories, and no one really likes it. That said, Choi does a decent job of forcibly drilling a bit of Finance knowledge into your brain. I’m actually only halfway through the class as I write this and have already used some of the information I’ve learned. The class consists of reading 2 extensive PowerPoints a week, 5 weekly discussion posts that requires you to dig into one of the course topics in more detail (200 word min), 2 sizeable case analyses (500 word min, but you’ll probably do MUCH more), and 3 closed-book (Half page notecard allowed for formulas only), Proctorio exams covering two modules each. There is a HIGHLY active Q&A board and he’s extremely responsive. You get a “problem set” each week for practice that you don’t actually have to do or turn in. DO NOT SKIP THESE. They’re essentially practice exams and the vast majority of the test will come directly from the problem sets. They’re big and time consuming, but very good practice. If you didn’t catch it earlier, I said there are 3 exams covering 2 modules each. This was not a typo. The class is 6 modules with the last module spanning the last two weeks. It will probably be a bear, but at the same time it also means you could potentially finish a week earlier if you want to push yourself. That’s not to say that the class is easy, the very first thing I said is that Finance is tough. However, if you do the work and put in the time, you should be able to earn yourself an A. The case analyses are a lot of research, but at the end of the day you will learn quite a bit while doing them and that knowledge will probably be your biggest takeaways from the class. As for the actual financial calculations, it’s pretty archaic but all the math is done on financial calculators NOT Excel… TI BAII Plus is recommended. At this point, it’s practically Jurassic to use a calculator so that’s a bit odd. This is something to keep in mind as you will essentially be learning a highly outdated process that lost relevance nearly 3 decades ago.
Update: The first test is easy, but the second two can be TOUGH. The mistake that many people seemed to have made was that they memorized the problem sets without actually learning how to solve the problems. DO the problem sets, don’t just memorize the answers.
“A” Strategy – Choi gives you ALL of the tools you need to earn an A. The class is extremely straightforward with no tricks (unlike some other professors). There is literally an easy, albeit extremely time-consuming “A” strategy and that is to do the problem sets as many times as you need to until you basically can get them 100% without your notes. However, don’t just memorize the problem sets, you need to understand how to actually work the problems out. He gives you a separate file with the answers and how to solve them so you can check. Also check the Q&A board for any problems you have issues with or ask on the boards. He’s highly responsive with how to solve the any question. He isn’t going to just hand you an A, but if you really put in the time and effort it is straightforward to earn one. The first test is dramatically easier than the second and third, so you need to STUDY. You get to make a single “formula sheet”. Write down every formula you use to solve the problem sets, even if it is a variation of an existing formula. This will save you time and effort. Convert all of his answers from the problem sets into their respective formulas. Also utilize any formulas he uses on the discussion boards, as they are sometimes easier to understand. You literally get EVERY tool you need and the rest is just effort (a lot of it).
Time Commitment – 20-40 hours/week. Honestly, this one really has the potential to be a real bear for some. Others may be gifted enough to handle the material easily so there’s going to be a huge range in time required. The two case analyses are time consuming due to the amount of research involved, don’t be misled by the “500 word minimum”. If you don’t study and prepare extensively for the tests, you will probably fail them. That said, you can actually have a failing average score on your tests and still get a B in the class.
In one phrase – “Finance made… not easy… but easier”
Difficulty – 4
Comments – Finance is tough. It’s boring, there are a ton of numbers and weird theories, and no one really likes it. That said, Choi does a decent job of forcibly drilling a bit of Finance knowledge into your brain. I’m actually only halfway through the class as I write this and have already used some of the information I’ve learned. The class consists of reading 2 extensive PowerPoints a week, 5 weekly discussion posts that requires you to dig into one of the course topics in more detail (200 word min), 2 sizeable case analyses (500 word min, but you’ll probably do MUCH more), and 3 closed-book (Half page notecard allowed for formulas only), Proctorio exams covering two modules each. There is a HIGHLY active Q&A board and he’s extremely responsive. You get a “problem set” each week for practice that you don’t actually have to do or turn in. DO NOT SKIP THESE. They’re essentially practice exams and the vast majority of the test will come directly from the problem sets. They’re big and time consuming, but very good practice. If you didn’t catch it earlier, I said there are 3 exams covering 2 modules each. This was not a typo. The class is 6 modules with the last module spanning the last two weeks. It will probably be a bear, but at the same time it also means you could potentially finish a week earlier if you want to push yourself. That’s not to say that the class is easy, the very first thing I said is that Finance is tough. However, if you do the work and put in the time, you should be able to earn yourself an A. The case analyses are a lot of research, but at the end of the day you will learn quite a bit while doing them and that knowledge will probably be your biggest takeaways from the class. As for the actual financial calculations, it’s pretty archaic but all the math is done on financial calculators NOT Excel… TI BAII Plus is recommended. At this point, it’s practically Jurassic to use a calculator so that’s a bit odd. This is something to keep in mind as you will essentially be learning a highly outdated process that lost relevance nearly 3 decades ago.
Update: The first test is easy, but the second two can be TOUGH. The mistake that many people seemed to have made was that they memorized the problem sets without actually learning how to solve the problems. DO the problem sets, don’t just memorize the answers.
“A” Strategy – Choi gives you ALL of the tools you need to earn an A. The class is extremely straightforward with no tricks (unlike some other professors). There is literally an easy, albeit extremely time-consuming “A” strategy and that is to do the problem sets as many times as you need to until you basically can get them 100% without your notes. However, don’t just memorize the problem sets, you need to understand how to actually work the problems out. He gives you a separate file with the answers and how to solve them so you can check. Also check the Q&A board for any problems you have issues with or ask on the boards. He’s highly responsive with how to solve the any question. He isn’t going to just hand you an A, but if you really put in the time and effort it is straightforward to earn one. The first test is dramatically easier than the second and third, so you need to STUDY. You get to make a single “formula sheet”. Write down every formula you use to solve the problem sets, even if it is a variation of an existing formula. This will save you time and effort. Convert all of his answers from the problem sets into their respective formulas. Also utilize any formulas he uses on the discussion boards, as they are sometimes easier to understand. You literally get EVERY tool you need and the rest is just effort (a lot of it).
Time Commitment – 20-40 hours/week. Honestly, this one really has the potential to be a real bear for some. Others may be gifted enough to handle the material easily so there’s going to be a huge range in time required. The two case analyses are time consuming due to the amount of research involved, don’t be misled by the “500 word minimum”. If you don’t study and prepare extensively for the tests, you will probably fail them. That said, you can actually have a failing average score on your tests and still get a B in the class.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:01 pm to baroqen
ACCT 701 - Huang
In one phrase – “Accounting for Dummies”
Difficulty – 2.5
Comments – Huang has a great class. She seems really nice and encourages students to email the coaches or even contact her directly with questions (Unlike Yuan who really doesn’t want you to contact her). The class itself is also highly condensed with a lot of knowledge without a massive time commitment. It’s not General Accounting, it’s a more focused Accounting class that teaches skills that will be useful to future business leaders. That’s not to say the class is easy, but it’s also not as intimidating as most people expect it to be. It’s theory oriented and focuses on teaching you the ins and outs of financial statements. Math nerds might be a bit disappointed. Huang provides multiple methods for learning: text, PowerPoints, lecture videos, and supplemental videos, along with Zoom sessions. Once again, this may sound intimidating but you only NEED the PowerPoints. She provides an array of learning methods because different people learn differently. I recommend just using her PowerPoints and listening to the course lectures, although you could technically stick with just one. The class consists of a 6 weekly, open notes, Proctorio “Homework” assignments graded on the best of TWO chances. These are homework and not quizzes or assessments so you can review between attempts. Like I said, she isn’t trying to be punitive, she’s giving you the tools to learn and succeed. You also have 6 weekly, closed-notes, Proctorio quizzes. The questions are on the identical material as the homework, although reconstructed to marginally different. If you know the homework material, you will know the quiz material. No tricks. There’s also a solo project in the final two week and an extra credit assignment in the last week. To be honest, the only drawback I felt in the class is that she has a relatively strong accent and some people may have difficulty understanding her. Fortunately, you can turn on a surprisingly accurate CC for the lecture videos.
Update: One final note on the project. When you first open up the project file it looks CRAZY and the first thought going through your head will be to wonder what the heck you got yourself into. However, once you start reading it, you’ll understand that she went into a crazy level of detail in what is essentially a gigantic rubric for the project. You’ll earn points just for putting the names of the companies that you’re going to be reviewing. The project is a 3-5 page paper including charts and you have two weeks to work on it. It’s actually a great little hand-on exercise to apply some of what you’ve learned through the class. Far more practical and useful “real world” knowledge than just taking another exam. I was concerned that it was deceptively easy due to the large amount of copy/paste involved… but true to form, Huang isn’t deceptive at all... A lot of it is copy/paste, the actual goal is finding the correct information to copy/paste. Starting the project is the toughest part, but it’s really primarily an accounting scavenger hunt. The goal appears to be to teach you how to “read” aka find relevant information from company financial statements. She also provides an extremely easy extra credit worth an additional 5%.
“A” Strategy – Watch the course lectures. It’s based on the PowerPoint so you don’t really need to do both. However, PRINT the PowerPoint and follow along and add notes as desired. Then, use the PowerPoint and notes during your homework assignment. If you don’t get 100%, study what you got wrong and do it again. Even if you got a 85% and you’re satisfied with that, DO THE HOMEWORK AGAIN. The questions are identical between attempts (except for the order of the answers), so doing it again is mainly for practice and the fact that you should be able to get a 100 the second time around (barring careless mistakes). The Proctorio pre-test procedures will probably take you longer than the quiz. The quizzes will always be based on the exact same concepts from the homework but will NOT be the exact same questions. If there are 3 parts to a concept and you were tested on one, brush up on the other two if you need to and then just take the quiz immediately after.
Time Commitment – 8 – 10 hours. No BS to sift through, it’s very straightforward and direct knowledge and skill building.
In one phrase – “Accounting for Dummies”
Difficulty – 2.5
Comments – Huang has a great class. She seems really nice and encourages students to email the coaches or even contact her directly with questions (Unlike Yuan who really doesn’t want you to contact her). The class itself is also highly condensed with a lot of knowledge without a massive time commitment. It’s not General Accounting, it’s a more focused Accounting class that teaches skills that will be useful to future business leaders. That’s not to say the class is easy, but it’s also not as intimidating as most people expect it to be. It’s theory oriented and focuses on teaching you the ins and outs of financial statements. Math nerds might be a bit disappointed. Huang provides multiple methods for learning: text, PowerPoints, lecture videos, and supplemental videos, along with Zoom sessions. Once again, this may sound intimidating but you only NEED the PowerPoints. She provides an array of learning methods because different people learn differently. I recommend just using her PowerPoints and listening to the course lectures, although you could technically stick with just one. The class consists of a 6 weekly, open notes, Proctorio “Homework” assignments graded on the best of TWO chances. These are homework and not quizzes or assessments so you can review between attempts. Like I said, she isn’t trying to be punitive, she’s giving you the tools to learn and succeed. You also have 6 weekly, closed-notes, Proctorio quizzes. The questions are on the identical material as the homework, although reconstructed to marginally different. If you know the homework material, you will know the quiz material. No tricks. There’s also a solo project in the final two week and an extra credit assignment in the last week. To be honest, the only drawback I felt in the class is that she has a relatively strong accent and some people may have difficulty understanding her. Fortunately, you can turn on a surprisingly accurate CC for the lecture videos.
Update: One final note on the project. When you first open up the project file it looks CRAZY and the first thought going through your head will be to wonder what the heck you got yourself into. However, once you start reading it, you’ll understand that she went into a crazy level of detail in what is essentially a gigantic rubric for the project. You’ll earn points just for putting the names of the companies that you’re going to be reviewing. The project is a 3-5 page paper including charts and you have two weeks to work on it. It’s actually a great little hand-on exercise to apply some of what you’ve learned through the class. Far more practical and useful “real world” knowledge than just taking another exam. I was concerned that it was deceptively easy due to the large amount of copy/paste involved… but true to form, Huang isn’t deceptive at all... A lot of it is copy/paste, the actual goal is finding the correct information to copy/paste. Starting the project is the toughest part, but it’s really primarily an accounting scavenger hunt. The goal appears to be to teach you how to “read” aka find relevant information from company financial statements. She also provides an extremely easy extra credit worth an additional 5%.
“A” Strategy – Watch the course lectures. It’s based on the PowerPoint so you don’t really need to do both. However, PRINT the PowerPoint and follow along and add notes as desired. Then, use the PowerPoint and notes during your homework assignment. If you don’t get 100%, study what you got wrong and do it again. Even if you got a 85% and you’re satisfied with that, DO THE HOMEWORK AGAIN. The questions are identical between attempts (except for the order of the answers), so doing it again is mainly for practice and the fact that you should be able to get a 100 the second time around (barring careless mistakes). The Proctorio pre-test procedures will probably take you longer than the quiz. The quizzes will always be based on the exact same concepts from the homework but will NOT be the exact same questions. If there are 3 parts to a concept and you were tested on one, brush up on the other two if you need to and then just take the quiz immediately after.
Time Commitment – 8 – 10 hours. No BS to sift through, it’s very straightforward and direct knowledge and skill building.
Posted on 5/17/19 at 7:46 am to baroqen
@baroqen,
thank you so much for your summaries -
first, does Huang use the 2 large pdfs from Accounting Principles for the reading assignment?
pdf 1 is Chapters 1-8
pdf 2 is chapter 9-18
second, to confirm, the weekly practice is open note and assessments are closed notes?
thanks,
Thomas
thank you so much for your summaries -
first, does Huang use the 2 large pdfs from Accounting Principles for the reading assignment?
pdf 1 is Chapters 1-8
pdf 2 is chapter 9-18
second, to confirm, the weekly practice is open note and assessments are closed notes?
thanks,
Thomas
This post was edited on 5/17/19 at 7:47 am
Posted on 5/17/19 at 3:21 pm to thomasbowen
Other than the 2 trick questions, were the rest similar to what was on the practice?
Posted on 5/18/19 at 2:22 am to baroqen
quote:
I highly HIGHLY recommend Huang for Acct 701. No tricks whatsoever, minimal amount of studying because she really prepares you for the class. After reading so many negative comments about other teachers, I can't stress enough how good Huang is. Straightfoward, no tricks, an easy final project (although I was confused at first because it seemed TOO easy), and an easy 5% extra credit. I ended her class with a 100% (because I did the extra credit just in case).
I second this evaluation. I found the class to be VERY straight forward, the tests have absolutely no tricks. I found that if I listened to the lecture and reviewed the power-point prior to the test I would get an A. The "homework" was nothing more than an open-note proctorio pre-test (20 to 25 questions with 2 hour time limit) that you could take twice with the highest grade recorded...there's no reason not to make 100% (50 points) every time. If I knew the concepts for the pretest, I knew them for the test. The only downside to the test is that it is 10 questions (30 minute time limit), so if you miss more than one you won't get an A on that exam; however, she drops the lowest test score, so if you struggle on one, no big deal. The "project" was very straight forward and although it seemed like a lot at first, once I dug into it I found it to be very easy to pull off.
There is absolutely no writing in the course outside of the final project. I averaged about 5 hours per week on this course and got a solid A in the class. Had I known this before the semester, I would have doubled up with another class. She can be a little hard to understand at times, but outside of that there is little to complain about.
I do not hesitate recommending Dr. Li Huang for Acct 701.
This post was edited on 5/18/19 at 2:46 am
Posted on 5/18/19 at 2:39 am to thomasbowen
quote:
first, does Huang use the 2 large pdfs from Accounting Principles for the reading assignment?
pdf 1 is Chapters 1-8
pdf 2 is chapter 9-18
second, to confirm, the weekly practice is open note and assessments are closed notes?
I'll jump in on that...no she does not use those pdfs. She has a custom power-point downloadable each week that is the basis for her video lectures. I only used these to study with in the class, I never used the book.
On your second question, yes open notes for the weekly "homework"/pre-test. Just print off the PowerPoint, since proctorio is a lock-down browser, and make notes on it when listening to the lecture. The weekly assessment/test is closed notes. Everything on the pre-test (as well as the weekly assessment) is going to come out of that PowerPoint, as straight forward as it can be.
One strategy I employed was to study the PowerPoint, listen to the lecture and then take the first attempt of the pre-test without notes, just to see how much I could do on my own. Then I would study the concepts I missed and use the notes on my second attempt to ensure I got an A. If you understand the concepts tested on the pretest, you will do well on the closed note assessment.
This post was edited on 5/18/19 at 2:49 am
Posted on 5/19/19 at 4:23 pm to Snuffleupagus09
Any advice on:
FIN 701 - Kim Sung
MADM 701 - Kimberley Williams
ISDS 730 (Lean Transformation) - Mike Loughrin
MADM 720 - Kimberley Williams
Thnx
FIN 701 - Kim Sung
MADM 701 - Kimberley Williams
ISDS 730 (Lean Transformation) - Mike Loughrin
MADM 720 - Kimberley Williams
Thnx
Posted on 5/19/19 at 7:05 pm to kcsims
Same class and finished this assessment with 11/12 -- I thought at least eight of the twelve questions were similar to the practice, with a couple of other questions that were in the chapters, but not well reviewed by the reading or materials. The trick questions were a bear...I wish I knew which one I got correct.
Posted on 5/19/19 at 7:23 pm to thomasbowen
Hey Thomas -- You know that the assessments for Ambrosio are open note, correct? "...you may use your book(s) (whether PDF or printed), your paper notes, or anything else that does not violate the restrictions above. You may also use files stored locally on your computer, such as Excel files, Word files, and PDF files. " The only restrictions is that internet usage and peer collaboration is banned.
This post was edited on 5/19/19 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:33 pm to Rybo44
Has anybody taken MKT 701 with Koskal and/or A. Darrat? Any input on workload/format. Thanks.
This post was edited on 5/22/19 at 1:28 am
Posted on 5/22/19 at 8:21 am to Mohawk MBA
MKT 701 with A Darrat involves posting weekly responses to discussion questions, replying to classmates, a few writing assignments and three proctored exams. The proctored exams are beasts...I’m convinced some of the material didn’t come from his slide decks which were supposed to include info direct from the textbook (not provided). But if you do well on the other stuff, you can walk away with an A or B.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 9:54 am to Mohawk MBA
Curious, why are so many legitimate posts being down-voted? Is there some jerk that has nothing better to do in here or someone that thinks they own the thread? Pretty much every post I've written has a down vote as does many other reasonable posts from other users. Just curious to know why. Thanks.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 2:22 pm to PresJohnTyler
Has anyone taken any of the classes below? Any advice. Thnx
FIN 701 - Kim Sung
MADM 701 - Kimberley Williams
ISDS 730 (Lean Transformation) - Mike Loughrin
MADM 720 - Kimberley Williams
FIN 701 - Kim Sung
MADM 701 - Kimberley Williams
ISDS 730 (Lean Transformation) - Mike Loughrin
MADM 720 - Kimberley Williams
Posted on 5/22/19 at 3:15 pm to PresJohnTyler
@PresJohnTyler - this thread has a bunch of lurkers that are directed here from the facebook group. Those same lurkers are massive crybaby snowflakes that dont want to work for their degree, or dont like the way some professors "talk condescendingly" so they sit on fb and trash professors, and come on here and downvote, ignore it. I have a feeling i know who they are - same ones who said some of these classes were "impossible" and that tests were "impassable", that i have now taken quite a few of them and arent bad at all, you just have to actually know the material and be able to think in a complex manner. Your posts have been spot on - so obviously you dont fall into that category
Posted on 5/22/19 at 7:02 pm to BTX722
Thanks for the input BTX.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 11:35 pm to zachtiger
quote:
@PresJohnTyler - this thread has a bunch of lurkers that are directed here from the facebook group. Those same lurkers are massive crybaby snowflakes that dont want to work for their degree, or dont like the way some professors "talk condescendingly" so they sit on fb and trash professors, and come on here and downvote, ignore it. I have a feeling i know who they are - same ones who said some of these classes were "impossible" and that tests were "impassable", that i have now taken quite a few of them and arent bad at all, you just have to actually know the material and be able to think in a complex manner. Your posts have been spot on - so obviously you dont fall into that category
LOL. He's right about the number of snowflakes, but there are also people that really have nothing better to do with their time but to downvote random posts. I wouldn't worry about it too much, since upvotes and downvotes really have ZERO impact on anything. I'd just ignore the people that would rather waste their time trolling than studying.
Page 400 of 463
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News