- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s talk weed stocks in this thread
Posted on 2/21/19 at 7:52 pm to igoringa
Posted on 2/21/19 at 7:52 pm to igoringa
quote:
as they are run by the same soccer mom whose real job is to work as an event planner
What the hell difference would this make? Both companies produce products that LVVV distributes and are in over 200 stores. I have used the sacred Biology CBD muscle rub (bought off the LVVV website) and it’s a great product. I don’t care if whoever produced it has kids that play soccer. I don’t care if whoever produced it has 10 other jobs. It’s a legit product. Jesus, you’ll bitch about anything.
And all of the High Hampton/Mojave info IS readily available - how much they paid, how many HH shares we got, etc. It’s all out there.
1
Posted on 2/21/19 at 7:53 pm to TigrrrDad
(no message)
Posted on 2/21/19 at 7:55 pm to TDFreak
quote:
Sounds like a lot of misdirection.
It’s simply a reminder that LVVV has a distribution license and is putting it to use regardless of the status of the uplisting. It’s something shareholders have been very vocal about - when the price is dipping, people don’t want silence. Any positive news is welcome (no matter how vague).
Posted on 2/21/19 at 7:58 pm to igoringa
quote:
And all of the High Hampton/Mojave info IS readily available - how much they paid, how many HH shares we got, etc. It’s all out there.
Yes what HH paid is out there - as even companies of that stature disclose what they paid for things.
How about LVVV - what did they pay for any of the 3? What did they own of any of the 3?
The point about the first two acquisitions is that they are basically worthless - bought into someone’s side job.
I will be the first to admit I am wrong if you simply can show me what lvvv paid and what percent they own for these three investments and what type of income these investments generate. The most basic requirements for analyzing investments - right?
I won’t dare try to get you to explain why they show no investment income in q3 or show the investment as I know that is over your head. Must have been the government shite down lolololol
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:01 pm to TDFreak
quote:
What on earth does all this mean? If it was supposed to be reassuring, it is having the opposite effect. Sounds like a lot of misdirection. Still hoping for a buyout
The tards on investor hub eat that ignorant shore up - cue tigerrrdad
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:07 pm to igoringa
quote:
The point about the first two acquisitions is that they are basically worthless
You’re right - a move that makes cannabis products available for purchase on your company website is irrelevant to a cannabis company.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:15 pm to igoringa
quote:
The most basic requirements for analyzing investments - right?
In penny land? Not so much.
You simply haven’t followed this thread.
If you want to pat yourself on the back for discovering the financials are a mess, I beat you to it dozens of pages ago. I posted that fact long ago here.
It has been irrelevant to the share price. I’ve had the opportunity to cash out at over 50% and multiple times at 25% - point me to stocks that give me those opportunities and I could not care less what the financials say or don’t say.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:23 pm to TigrrrDad
I'm up over 50% on msft. and that doesnt include dividends. I also asleep easy knowing they have thte investors best interest in mind.
basic rules of business require financial reporting to atleast meet basic standards. they'll never make it I'd they cant do those kinds of things or have enough money to pay someone to do them properly
basic rules of business require financial reporting to atleast meet basic standards. they'll never make it I'd they cant do those kinds of things or have enough money to pay someone to do them properly
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:26 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
It has been irrelevant to the share price. I’ve had the opportunity to cash out at over 50% and multiple times at 25% - point me to stocks that give me those opportunities and I could not care less what the financials say or don’t say.
Over what timeline? when did you start buying LVVV?
It seems like it's been awhile in which there have probably been quite a few, that also do not present the "lose everything" potential.
I own some LVVV so I'm not hating, I just don't think you can actually present a substantial argument for them. It's basically just a number on a roulette table; maybe not even that fair. I applaud your conviction though; got me to buy some. I'm hoping for all the best for LVVV even if I'm not a shareholder in the future.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:27 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
basic rules of business require financial reporting to atleast meet basic standards. they'll never make it I'd they cant do those kinds of things or have enough money to pay someone to do them properly
Oddly, their financials didn’t stop my kid’s shares from gaining 10,000%.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:39 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
You’re right - a move that makes cannabis products available for purchase on your company website is irrelevant to a cannabis company.
Jesus you are as dumb as you seem.
1) You don't buy a stake in the Company simply to distribute their products - that is called being a distributor.
2) I am pretty sure both your or I could call up Katie and be given the right to distribute her illustrious products (she may even let you join Scentsy under her!)
3) Getting these distributor relationships was huge! Revenue through Q2 was $13.5 pre these goldmine investments... Q3 with 2 months of these rights... $6.9K.
How much of the $6.9K in revenue did these diamonds in the rough make up? Where exactly is your 'relevance' thresholds.
And I understand why you don't want to answer the simple questions I am asking about the acquisitions you have blabbered on about multiple times in this thread. But being the nice guy I am:
What did LVVV pay for Alpha Creations? How much do they own? How much does Alpha make? What are the terms of the 100% option to buy (ie how much to buy)?
Same for Sacred? Same for the original purchase of Mojave Jane.
My theory is you don't have a fricking clue and you don't care. Whether it is 0.1% ownership or 1% or 10% or 100% you don't really actually think numbers matter - it is not possible. You just like taking the soundbites and spitting them back out. If you truly cared about the business including these investments - you would be pretty pissed off you don't know the answer to these. But you aren't because you don't.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:39 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
Oddly, their financials didn’t stop my kid’s shares from gaining 10,000%.
yes and if you hold them long enough you'll see that all evaporate.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:41 pm to igoringa
quote:
I won’t dare try to get you to explain why they show no investment income in q3 or show the investment as I know that is over your head
And what effect exactly did that have on the share price doubling from .03 to .06 in early q4?
And all of the issues you found in the ‘16 and ‘17 audited financials - what effect did that have in early ‘18 when the price ran from .02 to .08 in March?
And how much they paid for Mojave Jane or what percent they owned - what effect did that have when the price ran from .05 to .08 on that news?
I get it, you’re Joe Accountant. But all of this stuff is irrelevant.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:51 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
In penny land? Not so much.
You are the last person I am looking for on how things work in the penny market. LOL. Any update on the government shutdown?
quote:
If you want to pat yourself on the back for discovering the financials are a mess, I beat you to it dozens of pages ago. I posted that fact long ago here.
That is why you running to investor hub, posting and asking for help in rebuttal (which you didn't get). Got it. Good Try.
And you still don't get it. The financials are not the problem chief, it is the symptom. They cant keep basic book and records, they have failed at all their other previous business ventures, but now they have mastered it all. You keep just reiterating sound bites and quotes from a failure. And yes soundbites, even from a failure, can move the stock. Hence we have so many failures in the microcap space. Folks like you ensure it continues.
quote:
I could not care less what the financials say or don’t say.
That point is as clear as it can be.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:53 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
yes and if you hold them long enough you'll see that all evaporate
The “long” hold here is somewhere between 1-2 years from last September. The end of this summer is what we’ve been discussing for nearly 80 pages. The biggest move is expected after Paso Robles is up and running and showing revenue in conjunction with an expanded Coachella. And it has been repeatedly discussed that when a big catalyst sends it skyward, it will plunge to at best half of that peak just as quickly. This isn’t something we’re talking about riding for 5 years unless you’re just hanging on to a hamdful of freebies past the big move.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:55 pm to igoringa
quote:
That is why you running to investor hub, posting and asking for help in rebuttal (which you didn't get). Got it. Good Try.
I outright posted in my response here that I was going to put your info on ihub - the reason no one responded is because they’ve beat that stuff to death before. There have been many, many before you on ihub to say the same thing about the financials. No one responded because no one cared.
Like I said:
quote:
And what effect exactly did that have on the share price doubling from .03 to .06 in early q4? And all of the issues you found in the ‘16 and ‘17 audited financials - what effect did that have in early ‘18 when the price ran from .02 to .08 in March? And how much they paid for Mojave Jane or what percent they owned - what effect did that have when the price ran from .05 to .08 on that news?
quote:
That point is as clear as it can be.
And like I said again:
quote:
And what effect exactly did that have on the share price doubling from .03 to .06 in early q4? And all of the issues you found in the ‘16 and ‘17 audited financials - what effect did that have in early ‘18 when the price ran from .02 to .08 in March? And how much they paid for Mojave Jane or what percent they owned - what effect did that have when the price ran from .05 to .08 on that news?
Say it with me now: NONE. OF. IT. MATTERS.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 8:58 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
I get it, you’re Joe Accountant. But all of this stuff is irrelevant.
You are right and proved my point. What is relevant is there is enough people like you that believe and cheer on the retarded pumping. Yeah an acquisition! Terms? Who fricking cares - its like totally awesome. Doesn't matter what the deal was - it just like is awesome.
You don't have to convince me this moves like a pump and dump - that is literally my point buddy. You are the one pretending there is some fundamental basis - yet when asked anything that goes beyond regurgitating a management tweet you cry and mention your son.
So I am glad we agree, the financials are irrelevant as long as retards buy into ridiculous tweets with no real basis. Duh As long as it is positive, it doesn't matter how obscure. Glad you fessed up tonight.
Now run back to investor hub and tell everyone someone is being mean to you again.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 9:00 pm to Pendulum
quote:
I just don't think you can actually present a substantial argument for them.
Understatement of the year. Again though, I do believe you will get some opportunity to unload after one of the better pumps.
Posted on 2/21/19 at 9:00 pm to igoringa
quote:
Say it with me now: NONE. OF. IT. MATTERS.
Who gives a flying frick if it behaves like a pump and dump as long as the share price keeps going up often enough to give people opportunities for 25-50% gains while awaiting bigger news???
The difference between this and a pump and dump is that each time the share price has a spike, it's not because of a fluff piece forward-looking statement, it's because something real happened. And that may be something as slight as a permit or license - because the reality is that a VERY small percentage of cannabis companies are operating with legal compliance, so permits and licenses are valuable assets.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 2/21/19 at 9:03 pm to TigrrrDad
quote:
Say it with me now: NONE. OF. IT. MATTERS.
I think I said it three times now so hopefully you will pick that point up by sometime tomorrow. I can it can take some time to soak in.
And again - I am glad we are in agreement. Of course it was you who brought up the acquisitions all the time in this thread so you apparently thought it mattered. But glad you seen the light.
Page 81 of 158
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News