Is Google Chasing The 90% Potential Of Blockchain That Facebook Left Out?

Safer:Yea
Chance for exponential gains: No

Yeah, that's just what I want is to give Google an opportunity to capture, store and sell even more personal data about me to other parties.

Well, you can’t start a thread by insulting everyone in the OP and expect constructive dialogue. Try again.

quote:

---

Well, you can’t start a thread by insulting everyone in the OP and expect constructive dialogue. Try again.

---

You get insulted very easily then.

quote:

---

So I have avoided venturing out of the crypto thread because of some of the real life reception I have received trying to explain smart contracts. This is a great article to understand their potential and how a company SmartContracts and a crypto token Chainlink is playing a role.

---

This is a very condescending statement. Sorry I’ve pissed off the crypto tribe

If I want to invest in a currency, I'll buy the denar.

Now I debated with you a awhile back about Chainlink, and I continue to be skeptical of its actual future value for a number of reasons. But it does not seem to be as incompetently developed as their botched initial offering led me to believe. I guess we’ll see about it’s actual value and it’s adoption moving forward.

That all being said, this quote in the article stands out as dishonest.

quote:

---

Google’s decision to partner with Chainlink

---

Reading the blog post by the google developer advocate involved in the test project, nothing suggests a “partnership”
between Google and Chainlink. They just tested an application/process using Chainlink and showed it can he done and could be used in the future. It seemed more of a “look what Google Cloud can do” than anything like they do with all the other applications/process they test. And while it’s still a net positive for Chainlink, presenting that as some partnership does not jive with reality unless I’m missing something.

quote:

---

Reading the blog post by the google developer advocate involved in the test project, nothing suggests a “partnership” between Google and Chainlink. They just tested an application/process using Chainlink and showed it can he done and could be used in the future. It seemed more of a “look what Google Cloud can do” than anything like they do with all the other applications/process they test. And while it’s still a net positive for Chainlink, presenting that as some partnership does not jive with reality unless I’m missing something.

---

These comments echo some comments I saw on Reddit the day this came out.

Here is what Chainlink had to say from Twitter:

quote:

---

We're thrilled to share that Google is one of the great companies integrating #Chainlink into their approach to smart contract adoption. Here's how @GCPcloud users can use Chainlink to connect to BigQuery, one of Google's most popular cloud services.

---

I think the term partnership has lost some weight in the crypto world. That being said, if the tweet is accurate, an “integration” is arguably better imo.

I hate to tell you but you have fallen prey to an extreme Fud campaign to keep normal people from buying. Your sentiments in the other thread basically echoed the spamming of negative comments from Reddit. Even your comment about the google integration which is being reported in forbes is the same negative regurgitated response people used to discredit one of the biggest news in crypto.

If you don’t want to accept the Google integration then how about Oracle Partnering with Chainlink to help over 50 startups sell their data.
LINK