Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Home Value-appraisal square footage difference

Posted on 1/10/18 at 10:48 am
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3807 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 10:48 am
Its pretty common I suppose for tax records to have slightly different square footage than what the appraisal might show. But in looking at mine, and according to the lady handling our HELOC, there is a difference of 262 feet from appraisal to tax records. Who is wrong? Builder plans? Appraiser? Tax Records? All 3?

@ 140/sq. ft, that 262 ft. is a difference in market value of $36,680. That is enough to make me sick.

Anybody ever dealt with this? Is there any recourse?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24155 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:00 am to
The property appraiser should have the record with a diagram of the house right? Does the drawing have some numbers off?

Any idea where the extra sq footage came from?
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3807 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:09 am to
No idea. I just looked at the drawing and I'm going to measure it myself just to see if anything obvious stands out....starting to freak a little bit.
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:16 am to
was any unconditioned spaced finished after the house was built?
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3807 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:17 am to
No. House is as it was when it was built in 2014.
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:20 am to
Appraiser should include a diagram with measurements. Compare those with the original plans and you will have your answer.

Appraisers do make mistakes.
Posted by LSUTigKyl
Nashville
Member since May 2009
1910 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:26 am to
I sold my house last March. This happened to me. Tax records showed 2100 sq ft. Appraisal after going under contract showed 1705! We had them re-measure but only got to 1800. Cost me $35k on my house.

99% chance the appraiser is more accurate than the tax records. From what I understand tax records are taken from the initial building plans and things can change when the house is actually built. Also tax records don't take into account how the inside truly is. It's mainly just boxed measurements of rough plans from what I was told.
Posted by ConfusedHawgInMO
Member since Apr 2014
3578 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:27 am to
Some appraisers show the square footage of the "living area" and not necessarily everything under roof. Any garage, covered porch, deck, even a basement, etc will be a different line item.

Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
21599 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:32 am to
If a multi-story house make sure the appraiser measured every floor. I had a situation where the appraiser tried to refuse to measure my 2nd floor even though there was a 6' overlap.

Also, this particular appraiser would exclude stairs. He would measure around the stairs to calculate his sqft; then would measure the stairs and subtract it out.

Another thing to look at is it is my understanding that if it is a stan alone building, they are suppose to measure the outside of the house. If there are multi buildings (duplex/condo..) they measure the inside. I do not know if this a fact, but it could be something else to consider.
Posted by volinktown
Member since Apr 2017
1096 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 3:47 pm to
My house's tax record is 4100 ft but our appraisal number is 3600 ft. I guess the high ceiling area is counted twice in tax record.
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 3:54 pm to
Your builder shrunk your footprint to save 5k-10k on materials and labor and knew you wouldn’t find out until he was long gone. People never hire inspectors on new construction since they have builder warranty. It’s when they go to refi/resell they find out.
This post was edited on 1/10/18 at 3:55 pm
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3807 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 4:10 pm to
Problem (not actually a problem) solved.

The upstairs area is where the big difference is. I compared the sketches of the appraiser and the county and they were very similar. The error is that the county has that area designated as 1/2 square footage, making the upper something like 293 instead of 586...its a bit curious, my neighbors houses aren't calculated that same way....
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25734 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

The error is that the county has that area designated as 1/2 square footage, making the upper something like 293 instead of 586...its a bit curious, my neighbors houses aren't calculated that same way..

Don't tell the county that they're 293 sq ft short on the tax records....unless you feel like having them assess a higher value for your property tax
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

People never hire inspectors on new construction since they have builder warranty


For real? Hell, I'm buying a house I'm gutting and still hired one just to check out the stuff. It's $500 for more thorough and checklist of items.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram