Started By
Message

Give me scenarios where whole life/VUL would be a good idea to own

Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:00 am
Posted by JL
Member since Aug 2006
3038 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:00 am
I've got my 401k, backdoor roth IRA, 529 maxed out. I've got real estate investments and have a separate brokerage account loaded up for my early retirement. Seems like whole/VUL is the next tax advantaged investment I should be making, something I can pass on to my kids. Only other thing I would do with the money is invest in the market, which I'm already heavily invested in as a percentage of my net worth.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:05 am to
HSA?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:07 am to
Whole life and vUL are not investments, by the way.

If you need life insurance (you don't already have enough term coverage?), you should feel free to consider WL and vUL.

But if you've ever made an unkind comment about brokerage fees and management fees, I would encourage you to put your money elsewhere.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14323 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:34 am to
If you are loaded and have a sizable estate tax problem.....maybe.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:38 am to
quote:

something I can pass on to my kids


This would be an ideal scenario for permanent life insurance.

But you don't have to confuse permanent life insurance with anything growing cash values. The more bells and whistles you buy in a life insurance policy, the more expensive the physical (mechanical) cost of the policy will be.

I essentially have a no cash value Universal Life Insurance policy. It is basically a permanent term policy. And because it does not permit access to cash value or cash growth, 100% of the mechanics of the policy are built to sustaining a paid up permanent life insurance benefit (to offset losing social security income for my wife when I die or to pass on a benefit to my kids' families.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:56 am to
quote:

you don't already have enough term coverage?)


Life insurance companies love Term policies because they are a huge money maker. Only 2% of term policies pay a death benefit.

As to the OP I would steer away from VUL due to there being no guarantees. Go with a WL plan that is offered by an A rated mutual company.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 9:59 am
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16324 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:05 am to
I don't know a lot about the whole life/VUL policies, but something my business advisors keeps trying to sell me on is 2nd to die policies.

Said he picked up two $10M whole life policies, in which he listed each kid as the 2nd person on the policy, at a rate equivalent to a $2M 20-year term-life policy just for himself. Something about the census tables, their ages & health when the policies were taken out.

I haven't researched it because I am not there yet. But since you are asking, and I just had the 5th conversation about it last night, I figured I would throw it out as another option to research since the purpose would be to pass something on to your kids.

And before anyone asks, he does not sell them.
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Only other thing I would do with the money is invest in the market


A VUL is an extremely expensive way to invest in the market. You are correct about the tax advantages, but if you really are maxed out on everything else and have rental income as well, does it really seem likely you'd utilize this in retirement?

I mean, if you're some type of mega-millionaire where what you've described isn't going to be enough, then maybe. Otherwise, I'm not sure the tax advantages are so much better than the drag on the portfolio of fees and restrictions of a policy designed in this manner.

If you do want a $10m VUL that you intend to max out, can I sell it to you? Ole Gil could really use that commission!
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I essentially have a no cash value Universal Life Insurance policy. It is basically a permanent term policy. And because it does not permit access to cash value or cash growth, 100% of the mechanics of the policy are built to sustaining a paid up permanent life insurance benefit (to offset losing social security income for my wife when I die or to pass on a benefit to my kids' families.


And if you don't want to give me the sale, this would be my vote for best idea.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:09 am to
quote:

If you do want a $10m VUL that you intend to max out, can I sell it to you? Ole Gil could really use that commission!


You can take us all to lunch!
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

You can take us all to lunch!


Ole Gil is taking the first 20 commenters to a steak lunch at Ruth's. I'd even buy a round. Two for the OP.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 10:27 am to
IN!
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
3127 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:13 pm to
Self employed, maxed out on deferred investments, and make too much for Roth. If you don't fit this, there are better investment vehicles alongside a term policy.

There are ways to roll in short term, long term disability with the Life insurance policy. These are things that can be available to people employed by others that a small business owner doesn't have access to.

In my case, I have one.
I took a while with accountant helping to decide
I took the cost of 20 year term life, short term disability, long term disability, and the cost of a couple of other small riders that I wanted. The overall cost wasnt that far off.

It's not huge but if I make it another 16 years, the growth will be mine tax free. The taxes will be pretty high on my deferred because I don't plan on retiring. I'll still own the business while taking retirement distributions distributions.

I think as a primary retirement vehicle it's not the best. If you fit certain parameters, and you expect your post retirement age taxation to be as high, or higher than it is now, it can be an adjunct to a balanced portfolio.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2115 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Said he picked up two $10M whole life policies, in which he listed each kid as the 2nd person on the policy, at a rate equivalent to a $2M 20-year term-life policy just for himself

How does it compare with term for the kids? Is the objective to pass wealth to grandkids, skipping a generation?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Life insurance companies love Term policies because they are a huge money maker. Only 2% of term policies pay a death benefit.


Is the stated goal to claim a death benefit on a term life insurance policy?
Or is the goal for an insured to outlive a term life insurance policy?

Serious question.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16324 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

How does it compare with term for the kids?

Good question that I didn't even think to ask. I am not in position to do something like this just yet as my true wealth earning is just starting and I have other things I need to focus on first.

quote:

Is the objective to pass wealth to grandkids, skipping a generation?

Essentially. It will essentially allow the kids to get a high value life insurance at a low rate; hard to justify a $10M life insurance policy on someone without wealth or earning potential.

The other side of it is, they will be able to "borrow" against that cash value without having to pay it back. It just reduces the payout upon death. It sounds like a great concept, I just haven't researched it too much but wanted to throw it out there for OP as it could be something in his wheelhouse.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

quote:
Said he picked up two $10M whole life policies, in which he listed each kid as the 2nd person on the policy, at a rate equivalent to a $2M 20-year term-life policy just for himself

How does it compare with term for the kids? Is the objective to pass wealth to grandkids, skipping a generation?


The attraction of the plan is compound growth.
The most valuable asset for large compound growth is time. Securing the illustration to a 2nd to die is a the easiest way to illustrate a stretched out compound growth chart.

My 2 concerns with this type of plan.
1) it is still whole life. The most expensive insurance contract in the market. Management fees eat into performance every year. If you are looking at this as an investment opportunity, an index fund or ETF could potentially do much better 8 years out of 10.
2) anything that requires super long durations to show attractive compound growth needs a crutch to make it look attractive.

Additional concerns would potentially be the quality of the underwriter. You are forecasting a life insurance policy that could stretch out 80 to 100 years in order to payout on promises. Where is Sears? Where is Blockbuster? Where is Lehman Brothers? There is a market risk possibly not associated with normal insurance instruments.
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
16171 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:41 pm to
I think more real estate would be a better investment to pass down to kids. It appreciates over time and you can depreciate it which will help with your taxes.

And when you die the basis will not be zero for your kids, it will be the value at the time of your death and they can keep it or sell it tax free for up to 6 months after your death, from what I understand.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Is the stated goal to claim a death benefit on a term life insurance policy?
Or is the goal for an insured to outlive a term life insurance policy?


It could be both. You are buying term for the "what if" not necessary the "what will be."

You don't think that life insurance companies love selling Term for the fact that it's a money maker for them?

Serious question.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 2:16 pm
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
16171 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

You don't think that life insurance companies love selling Term for the fact that it's a money maker for them?


I'm pretty sure everything they sell is profitable for them.

WL must be more profitable because they push the shite out it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram