- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: $DXYZ - like $VCX with a larger float
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:36 am to Upperdecker
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:36 am to Upperdecker
This stock has turned to garbage
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:54 am to deltaland
quote:
This stock has turned to garbage
Why Would all the companies in the fund be doing well but the fund is losing value?
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 9:59 am
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:17 pm to deltaland
quote:
wtf just happened this thing just bombed
Can anyone explain what’s going on here? Back to back 10% loss days while the market is running hot.
What am I not understanding? Profit taking?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:38 pm to supadave3
quote:
wtf just happened this thing just bombed
Can anyone explain what’s going on here? Back to back 10% loss days while the market is running hot.
What am I not understanding? Profit taking?
It's stupidly overvalued
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:48 pm to supadave3
quote:
quote:
This stock has turned to garbage
Why Would all the companies in the fund be doing well but the fund is losing value?
Because the stock price is trading a huge premium to NAV.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 4:12 pm to Odinson
quote:
$DXYZ - like $VCX with a larger float
Odinson
Dilution
It's a CEF they can't issue stock below NAV. Issuing stock is not dilutive, it's actually accretive.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 6:28 pm to whodatigahbait
I should have sold it all at 72
Maybe it’ll have one more run up near SpaceX IPO day
Maybe it’ll have one more run up near SpaceX IPO day
Posted on 5/27/26 at 7:15 pm to deltaland
quote:
I should have sold it all at 72
Maybe it’ll have one more run up near SpaceX IPO day
It very well might, but this stock is meant to be traded. It's basically a meme stock that is trading completely uncoupled from the underlying fundamentals.
For example, SpaceX is ~16% of the book as of year end. Simple math says SpaceX needs to go up 6x in order to justify the current premium (the rest of the portfolio being equal).
Obviously that isn't happening any time soon.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 7:51 pm to deltaland
Below $50 I’m out til it cools down to NAV. Until it goes below $50 it still has a chance to cup and handle here. Would have liked to see it hold $56 though
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:05 pm to Upperdecker
I added more today. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. But my cup and handle pattern is still in play. And I just found out the CEO has been posting on stocktwits under an official company account
Posted on 6/8/26 at 10:00 pm to whodatigahbait
This turd here. Anyone buying at this price?
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 5:42 am
Posted on 6/12/26 at 11:48 am to Upperdecker
Some people here unhappy after buying in on the wrong side of NAV. I’m adding here.
With SPCX IPO and Anthropic new valuation raise, my calculated NAV is now above share price ($34 NAV vs $31.50 share price). I’m adding big again here. The key to these funds is staying on the right side of NAV - buy below NAV, sell above NAV. Plus this one is a momentum play.
CEO has been posting recently on stocktwits - he has a ton of cash on hand now from selling way above NAV, and I think he’s planning something big for it - potentially adding more Anthropic in their new round
With SPCX IPO and Anthropic new valuation raise, my calculated NAV is now above share price ($34 NAV vs $31.50 share price). I’m adding big again here. The key to these funds is staying on the right side of NAV - buy below NAV, sell above NAV. Plus this one is a momentum play.
CEO has been posting recently on stocktwits - he has a ton of cash on hand now from selling way above NAV, and I think he’s planning something big for it - potentially adding more Anthropic in their new round
Posted on 6/12/26 at 4:58 pm to Upperdecker
My dumb question of the day.
How do you determine the NAV?
How do you determine the NAV?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:07 pm to supadave3
NAV is calculated once per day on ETFs. last reported for this was 19.97. whether upperdecker has a proprietary calculation is unknown 
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:31 pm to cgrand
quote:
NAV is calculated once per day on ETFs. last reported for this was 19.97. whether upperdecker has a proprietary calculation is unknown
Great. I just put more in the boat at $28 and change.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:47 pm to supadave3
if you buy DXYZ you are electing to pay a premium over NAV to have access to private equity that otherwise is unavailable to you as a retail investor. Whether that premium is worth it to you at 28 vs NAV of 20 is your call. It was trading in the 70’s a while back 
Posted on 6/12/26 at 6:35 pm to cgrand
quote:
call. It was trading in the 70’s a while back
I know! That’s what keeps me coming back for more.
More punishment
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:50 am to cgrand
quote:
NAV is calculated once per day on ETFs. last reported for this was 19.97. whether upperdecker has a proprietary calculation is unknown
Not for these closed end ones. DXYZ reports book NAV quarterly. Last NAV update was ~$25 at end of March. That uses the most recent objective values of each company in the portfolio - based on most recent funding rounds
I’m recalculating NAV using projected next funding valuations for companies that are announcing some type of valuation or rumored to be getting funding at a specific value. For example, SpaceX was last valued at $1T for the book value NAV for DXYZ. But it just went to market at a $2.1T market cap. I’m updating NAV based on that. Same for Anthropic etc. The only thing I can’t account for is sale of shares ATM when share price is over NAV - but I assume they only sell over calculated NAV like I use. When selling ATM over NAV, they collect on the premium, but it dilutes the existing exposure, so the book NAV goes up but my calculated NAV goes down as it’s split between more shares. And I can’t account for it until they report updated share counts, so the whole thing is an estimate obviously. But it does give a solid range of value for the fund, and usually the selling won’t be as extreme so it shouldn’t impact my calculated NAV to the same level
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:02 am to supadave3
quote:
How do you determine the NAV?
Net asset value - value of total assets, including cash, divided by total shares. So it’s a per share stat, so you can directly compare it to share price
Post above explains how I’m recalculating it based on current data rather than lagging quarterly data as reported by company
Popular
Back to top


2




