- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily Bitcoin Article
Posted on 2/22/14 at 4:05 pm to Walking the Earth
Posted on 2/22/14 at 4:05 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:I know you're being sarcastic, but the magic speculation market is more stable than bitcoins on mt gox.
t's about the right time for Magic: The Gathering to become "retro" so they can just go back to their original business.
This post was edited on 2/22/14 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/22/14 at 5:24 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:No more than the number of public addresses in existence. There has not been a single day in which as many as 200,000 unique addresses have been used.
How many Bitcoin owners are there?
quote:Let me quote someone you might be familiar with,
I don't know what you're talking about. All I know is that I would have assumed that if Mt. Gox crashed, the whole thing would go down the toilet.
quote:
Would you mind providing me with evidence of this sweeping statement?
Posted on 2/22/14 at 5:51 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
No more than the number of public addresses in existence
False. Coinbase just eclipsed 1,000,000 users. Those users Coinbase wallets are off chain wallets and not identifiable on the block chain.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 6:43 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Then Coinbase owns the Bitcoins and not the wallet owners. Those wallets have nothing until Coinbase transfers the Bitcoins to them on the blockchain. All the wallet owners possess is trust that Coinbase won't screw them over. Coinbase is essentially nothing more than Bank of America for Bitcoins without FDIC backing.
False. Coinbase just eclipsed 1,000,000 users. Those users Coinbase wallets are off chain wallets and not identifiable on the block chain.
How does a Coinbase wallet owner, who just so happens to find himself in Greeley, CO, go to the one convenience store in the United States that accepts Bitcoins and buy a pack of chewing gum? Please tell me what steps a someone would have to go through to use the Bitcoins in their Coinbase wallet to purchase a pack of chewing gum.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:08 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
How does a Coinbase wallet owner, who just so happens to find himself in Greeley, CO, go to the one convenience store in the United States that accepts Bitcoins and buy a pack of chewing gum? Please tell me what steps a someone would have to go through to use the Bitcoins in their Coinbase wallet to purchase a pack of chewing gum.
1. Takes out his phone
2. Opens up his Coinbase wallet
3. Scans the QR code
4. Hits enter
It is a very complicated process, but we are in the early stages.
quote:
Coinbase is essentially nothing more than Bank of America for Bitcoins without FDIC backing.
Well, accept Coinbase is a full reserve bank of sorts.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 9:22 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Is this a coherent statement?
Well, accept Coinbase is a full reserve bank of sorts.
Posted on 2/22/14 at 9:54 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Well, except for whatever Coinbase is, what else backs the money you deposit? If nothing, then it's still a bit of a crap-shoot.
Well, accept Coinbase is a full reserve bank of sorts.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 12:57 am to joshnorris14
You've just described a glorified debit card transaction denominated in Bitcoins. That is some Earth shattering technological breakthrough. Reinventing a process that has existed for decades. How much do you pay for this revolutionary service?
Posted on 2/23/14 at 8:55 am to Poodlebrain
quote:
You've just described a glorified debit card transaction denominated in Bitcoins.
I didn't say it was an earth-shattering point-of-sale breakthrough.
quote:
How much do you pay for this revolutionary service?
If it's between Coinbase wallets it's free, if not you pay whatever mining fees are denoted.
Again, as Wiki and myself have said for some time now, the bitcoin network MUST develop as a transaction network before it can develop into anything else.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:22 am to joshnorris14
quote:We know...we know. It's early in the development, right? Five years is not nearly long enough......
Again, as Wiki and myself have said for some time now, the bitcoin network MUST develop as a transaction network before it can develop into anything else.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:46 am to LSURussian
quote:
We know...we know. It's early in the development, right? Five years is not nearly long enough......
It took two decades for TCP/IP to be introduced to DHTML. SMTP came way before.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:50 am to joshnorris14
quote:It only took 8 years to put a man on the moon.
It took two decades for TCP/IP to be introduced to DHTML. SMTP came way before.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 12:27 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Are you sure? You've hyped Bitcoins as something earth-shattering, but you concede it relies on mundane point-of-sale procedures. The mundane prevents anything earth-shattering.
I didn't say it was an earth-shattering point-of-sale breakthrough.
quote:Bitcoin charges 1% for processing transactions according to this article. LINK That's just a little bit more than free.
If it's between Coinbase wallets it's free, if not you pay whatever mining fees are denoted.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 2:51 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
Bitcoin charges 1% for processing transactions
Coinbase.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 5:02 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
No more than the number of public addresses in existence. There has not been a single day in which as many as 200,000 unique addresses have been used.
And you have taken a poll of all of these owners? May I see it?
quote:
Let me quote someone you might be familiar with,
quote:
Would you mind providing me with evidence of this sweeping statement?
I need to provide "evidence" of my opinion?
Posted on 2/23/14 at 5:29 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:You are asking me for evidence to support my statement. How about some empirical evidence? Coinbase claims to have over 980,000 consumer wallets. How much advertising does Coinbase do explaining the technology on their website? None, it links you to a Youtube video to explain what Bitcoins are. Based on that I conclude that Coinbase users are not overly concerned with the Bitcoin protocols.
And you have taken a poll of all of these owners? May I see it?
quote:Some evidence in support of your opinions would be a nice courtesy since you seek it from others.
I need to provide "evidence" of my opinion?
Posted on 2/23/14 at 5:39 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
You are asking me for evidence to support my statement. How about some empirical evidence? Coinbase claims to have over 980,000 consumer wallets. How much advertising does Coinbase do explaining the technology on their website? None, it links you to a Youtube video to explain what Bitcoins are. Based on that I conclude that Coinbase users are not overly concerned with the Bitcoin protocols.
You made a strong declarative statement about a group of people that probably numbers in the millions as if you knew something someone else didn't. I guess it turns out you know nothing.
quote:
Some evidence in support of your opinions would be a nice courtesy since you seek it from others.
When a nascent "currency" has one dominant means of exchange that gets the majority of the press, I would assume that severely hampering that exchange would be a crippling if not terminal event for the "currency". I was surprised to see that that was not the case...at least not so far.
Are you saying that if 2 months ago I had given you advance knowledge that Gox would be virtually frozen, your prediction would have been for bistamp and others to still be as high as they are?
Posted on 2/23/14 at 8:09 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:Seeing as I have never made any predictions regarding the price of Bitcoins, it wouldn't have made any difference. The only predictions I have made about Bitcoins have been with respect to its utility as a currency and its ability to avoid regulation and circumvent law enforcement.
Are you saying that if 2 months ago I had given you advance knowledge that Gox would be virtually frozen, your prediction would have been for bistamp and others to still be as high as they are?
Posted on 2/23/14 at 10:12 pm to Poodlebrain
The head of MtGox has resigned his board seat with the Bitcoin Foundation leading to speculation another bad news announcement will be forthcoming from MG.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 2/24/14 at 7:39 am to LSURussian
quote:
The head of MtGox has resigned his board seat with the Bitcoin Foundation
Poor little fella. Keep your head up buddy and don't forget...trust the protocol!
Popular
Back to top



0



