- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Costs for a utility pipeline
Posted on 7/10/18 at 10:22 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 10:22 am
Anyone have an idea of the construction costs excluding acquisiation fee from the landowner but including materials,engineering,labor, and possibly permitting fees for an underground eight (8) inch diameter utility pipeline for the transportation of oxygen or nitrogen on a per rod (16.5) basis or even for a per mile disance ?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 10:26 am to CharleyLake
Don't think you're going to find the answer you're looking for here. I'm in the pipeline business and there are hundreds of variables that determine cost.
- States/local/federal permits/fees are variable
- Type of terrain (rocky, loose soil, hills etc)
- Number of road crossings
- Number of water crossings
- Wall thickness & grade of pipe
- Coating spec of pipe
- Environmental impact consulting
- Indigenous/archaeological surveys
- Size of ROW
- Remediation requirements
- Cost of contractor/labor
- Logistical costs for transporting pipe
And many many more. It's tough to even get a baseline cost because it can depend on the region
- States/local/federal permits/fees are variable
- Type of terrain (rocky, loose soil, hills etc)
- Number of road crossings
- Number of water crossings
- Wall thickness & grade of pipe
- Coating spec of pipe
- Environmental impact consulting
- Indigenous/archaeological surveys
- Size of ROW
- Remediation requirements
- Cost of contractor/labor
- Logistical costs for transporting pipe
And many many more. It's tough to even get a baseline cost because it can depend on the region
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 10:36 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:30 pm to TexasTiger1984
I thought it would be a tough estimation with all of the vairables. I seem to have discovered that a pipeline was placed on family proprty without permission from the owners. I suspect that the pipeline company did get permission from a railroad company who was granted a right-of-way in 1947. The pipeline company failed to recognize that the railroad was only granted a servitude, not fee title.
My thought that an estimation for the measure of damages for legal bad faith trespass would be what it would cost the pipeline company construct a new pipeline around the property. Appreciate the reply.
My thought that an estimation for the measure of damages for legal bad faith trespass would be what it would cost the pipeline company construct a new pipeline around the property. Appreciate the reply.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:34 pm to CharleyLake
Ummm....Oxygen or Nitrogen? One of these is not like the other.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:36 pm to CharleyLake
Oh, nvm. I see where you are headed. Good luck with that.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 2:47 pm to CharleyLake
Have they acknowledged the pipeline is there improperly? If you have the documentation showing that the railroad company only had servitude you can probably get them to cave pretty easily.
Talk to their land department and tell them you want to be made whole or have the pipeline rerouted with also being paid the lease fees they should have paid you from the beginning. I guarantee they'll pay you out if you're legally in the right. They'll give you a number...you 'mull it over for a while' and reply back saying you want triple their offer or you'll take legal action.
Again, make sure you have legal standing and you can get pretty much whatever you want (within reason). Pipeline companies don't like to frick around with lawsuits and would rather just pay someone to go away.
Talk to their land department and tell them you want to be made whole or have the pipeline rerouted with also being paid the lease fees they should have paid you from the beginning. I guarantee they'll pay you out if you're legally in the right. They'll give you a number...you 'mull it over for a while' and reply back saying you want triple their offer or you'll take legal action.
Again, make sure you have legal standing and you can get pretty much whatever you want (within reason). Pipeline companies don't like to frick around with lawsuits and would rather just pay someone to go away.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 7/10/18 at 3:55 pm to CharleyLake
I would do more research at city hall/clerk or courts office . 1947 to present is a lot of time to pass, and i am willing to bet, a number of different heirs since that date as well.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 4:56 pm to CharleyLake
Passed this on to a friend of mine, he said to check out this: LINK
then:
find the line and see when was installed
and what the product is
and who the operator is
then:
find the line and see when was installed
and what the product is
and who the operator is
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:13 pm to CharleyLake
Is the pipeline currently active?
$2 million per mile is the rule of thumb
ETA- that is probably including acquisition fee though
$2 million per mile is the rule of thumb
ETA- that is probably including acquisition fee though
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 7/10/18 at 5:21 pm to CharleyLake
This should be interesting.....
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:38 pm to TigerBalsagna
The opereator has two parallel 8" lines. One of them appears to be on property expropriated by LA DOTD, they other in the RR ROW.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:40 pm to TexasTiger1984
Not yet. I have requested authorization from their land department. Thanks for the guidance.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:45 pm to tigeraddict
There have been a number of heirs,for sure. I have nine volumes of the Section abstract including all of the successions. It was prepared for another legal matter about three years ago.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:47 pm to TigerTatorTots
I recently read something like that for a somewhat larger natural gas pipeline. Thanks.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:02 pm to Marlbud
It has become interesting. I am researching remedies for legal bad faith trespass. As I appreaciate it, the possessor thinks that they are in the right but it is reasonable that they should have known who was the rightful owner (from the public records, for example).
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:56 pm to CharleyLake
The reason I say "interesting" is because most RR ROW is purchased in fee. If the RR only received an easement I would look to see if the ROW was procured through expropriation. It is one thing to condemn for an easement but a much larger feat to condemn for fee simple.
Even if turns out that the easement was awarded to the RR by the court, one can only condemn for necessity so the RR would have to prove that the pipeline served as a necessary appurtenance to the operation of the RR.
Sounds like the land folks didn't do their due diligence.
Even if turns out that the easement was awarded to the RR by the court, one can only condemn for necessity so the RR would have to prove that the pipeline served as a necessary appurtenance to the operation of the RR.
Sounds like the land folks didn't do their due diligence.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:42 pm to Marlbud
I looked up a legal opinion for the same Railroad ROW in an older matter. My ancestors granted a right-of-way deed for "servitude only." No expropriation was involved with the railroad, that is to say that it was not awarded to the railroad by the court system.
I agree that it is likely that their land folks assumed that the land under the 100'with railroad ROW was not retained. I gave the pipeline company until the end of the month to search title and to provide me with authorization to construct and operate the pipeline.
1. Has the ---family owned the property from --to present day?
2. Did --pipeline company construct and operate an 8" pipeline on the ---'s property without permission from--until 2018?
The distance of this pipeline connects to a point of termiation of the same line that we we have an agreement with the alleged trespasser. We are simply not being paid for about 180' to the Section Boundary from the POT.
Would you agree that the mesurement of value is not the 180' plus judicial interest but for bad-faith trespass considering the amount of ill-gotten gains or perhaps the cost of construction for a new pipeline and loss of future sales?
Kind of like bypassing a toll booth for a number of years on the way to market with your produce.
Marbud,thanks for sticking with me on this matter. I will engage an attorney if they are not forthcoming.
I agree that it is likely that their land folks assumed that the land under the 100'with railroad ROW was not retained. I gave the pipeline company until the end of the month to search title and to provide me with authorization to construct and operate the pipeline.
1. Has the ---family owned the property from --to present day?
2. Did --pipeline company construct and operate an 8" pipeline on the ---'s property without permission from--until 2018?
The distance of this pipeline connects to a point of termiation of the same line that we we have an agreement with the alleged trespasser. We are simply not being paid for about 180' to the Section Boundary from the POT.
Would you agree that the mesurement of value is not the 180' plus judicial interest but for bad-faith trespass considering the amount of ill-gotten gains or perhaps the cost of construction for a new pipeline and loss of future sales?
Kind of like bypassing a toll booth for a number of years on the way to market with your produce.
Marbud,thanks for sticking with me on this matter. I will engage an attorney if they are not forthcoming.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 4:01 pm to CharleyLake
At the end of the day, I think you will be awarded $1000 a rod plus court cost if the pipeline company acts in good faith to cure the matter.
I was involved in a encroachment issue in which I represented Union Pacific 20 years ago in Nebraska. UP hired a title company to due the title and to issue a title certificate which insures ownership along with errors and omissions.
This was turned over to a service company landman to purchase the rights in fee. Long story short, the new rail line was built on another property which I was able to settle with minimal risk and dollars.
You never know though, you night be able to cut a fat hog in the arse.
I was involved in a encroachment issue in which I represented Union Pacific 20 years ago in Nebraska. UP hired a title company to due the title and to issue a title certificate which insures ownership along with errors and omissions.
This was turned over to a service company landman to purchase the rights in fee. Long story short, the new rail line was built on another property which I was able to settle with minimal risk and dollars.
You never know though, you night be able to cut a fat hog in the arse.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 5:35 pm to Marlbud
For your reading pleasure and I had forgotten about the discussion, go to Google>Louisiana Pipeline Trespass> OT Atorney's Prescriptive Easements Tiger Droppings. 7/21/12
It took three full years but that hog was butchered.
This case is similar but distinguishable.
It took three full years but that hog was butchered.
This case is similar but distinguishable.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 5:56 pm to CharleyLake
I'll read it in time......
Blood money get's paid often depending on the circumstances.
Blood money get's paid often depending on the circumstances.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News