- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cashing in 401k to put down on a house
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:13 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
Posted on 3/15/13 at 5:13 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
My plan is to stay with this company 30 years
This is VERY rare in this day and age. Used to be common, but not anymore.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 6:14 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
Personally I wouldn't bank on any pension for retirement. It's an antiquated model that's set up for failure. They're pretty much Ponzi schemes. Just my opinion.
As some others have said, is a bigger mortgage an option? Surely you can get over 4% ROI from your 401k, so I'd leave it put. Now, PMI is another thing to consider I suppose.
As some others have said, is a bigger mortgage an option? Surely you can get over 4% ROI from your 401k, so I'd leave it put. Now, PMI is another thing to consider I suppose.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 6:54 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
I haven't contributed to this 401k in 2.5 years and havent really thought about it once.
Not really a great justification. Just because you don't think about it doesn't mean its not your money and not going to be worth significantly more in 30 yrs. This is a horrible idea IMO. Buy a house you can afford without raiding your retirement accounts, and don't rely on sticking with a company for 30 years and getting a pension, it's not guaranteed.
Posted on 3/15/13 at 7:11 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
If you need money to put down on a house and you don't have it in the bank, then you really have no choice. If you're asking our opinion... Think about it like this: You're going to face a 10% penalty and have to pay at least 20% in taxes, but that's based on your income. You could actually be in a higher tax bracket. So, let's say you've got 100 K in your 401. You pay 10,000 for your penalty and 20,000 for your taxes (Probably more like 30,000). You take home $60,000 and lose $40,000. It was designed for you to defer your taxes. That way, your money continues to grow until you reach the actual retirement age. Once you retire, you're not going to have to pay the penalty and you're going to be in a lower tax bracket than you are now. That means more money for you. Good luck in whatever you choose though.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:11 am to adavis
$100k will be worth $1,006,265 in thirty years assuming 8% annual returns.
$65,000 towards a house, assuming 5% annual growth (national average in housing)' would be worth $280,926.
Which one of those makes more sense?
$65,000 towards a house, assuming 5% annual growth (national average in housing)' would be worth $280,926.
Which one of those makes more sense?
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:42 am to NS Who Dat Nation
Basically everyone except for TIGERLillie (or whatever his name is) thinks this is a shitty idea.
There is a lot of wisdom in this thread, a lot of these guys know what they are talking about, SO PAY ATTENTION.
You do not NEED a house, you WANT a house. You've got house fever, and you NEED to think about the next 5 years instead of the next 5 months. If you WANT a house that bad, you NEED to find another way to come up with the money.
If I WANT something bad enough, I find a way to save up and pay for it without hurting my future. Before I pull from retirement and take a penalty, pay tax, and lose the opportunity cost, I'd pause contributions short term and save the money instead.
There is a lot of wisdom in this thread, a lot of these guys know what they are talking about, SO PAY ATTENTION.
You do not NEED a house, you WANT a house. You've got house fever, and you NEED to think about the next 5 years instead of the next 5 months. If you WANT a house that bad, you NEED to find another way to come up with the money.
If I WANT something bad enough, I find a way to save up and pay for it without hurting my future. Before I pull from retirement and take a penalty, pay tax, and lose the opportunity cost, I'd pause contributions short term and save the money instead.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:42 am to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
So we are thinking about cashing in my old 401k to put down on the new house. (I have a pension now).
Wouldn't it be smarter to roll the 401K into an IRA account?
I think a one time 10K home down payment from an IRA account is permissible without penalty.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:44 am to Powerman
quote:
Wouldn't it be smarter to roll the 401K into an IRA account?
I think a one time 10K home down payment from an IRA account is permissible without penalty.
On a Roth IRA, not a traditional IRA.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:44 am to TIGRLEE
quote:
Well if he doesn't have the cash in bank to put down and that's the only place he get gt his hands on it... Answer is simple,
Yeah. The answer is simple....exercise some patience. The idea that you are somehow forced to rob a 401K account to put a down payment on a house is absurd.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:45 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
On a Roth IRA, not a traditional IRA.
Well in that case, open a rollover roth IRA. You'll have the tax event but you at least won't incur the 10% penalty.
If 10K plus whatever he already has saved up for a down payment isn't enough then he's probably biting off more than he can chew anyway IMO
Posted on 3/16/13 at 11:52 am to Powerman
Short-term it's a good move. Long-term it's a lousy move.
What about rolling the 401 to an IRA and then taking a distribution for the down payment?
What about rolling the 401 to an IRA and then taking a distribution for the down payment?
Posted on 3/16/13 at 12:06 pm to Dr Rosenrosen
quote:
What about rolling the 401 to an IRA and then taking a distribution for the down payment?
If he is wed to this idea, that seems like the smartest move.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 12:21 pm to Dr Rosenrosen
*doh
The IRA down payment is only for first time home buyers...
He wouldn't be able to exercise that option.
The IRA down payment is only for first time home buyers...
He wouldn't be able to exercise that option.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 12:26 pm to Powerman
quote:
The IRA down payment is only for first time home buyers...
Haha, glad you figured this out on your own.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 12:33 pm to slackster
quote:
Haha, glad you figured this out on your own.
So the only smart move here is save the money, and be patient. Pretty simple idea. But I have a feeling he's gonna ignore all the good advice ITT, and listen to Tigerlee and 5 years from now be kicking himself for being childish.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 1:17 pm to slackster
quote:
Haha, glad you figured this out on your own.
I remembered reading about some of the rules a while back and it dawned on me that he wasn't talking about a first time purchase.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 1:18 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
So the only smart move here is save the money, and be patient. Pretty simple idea. But I have a feeling he's gonna ignore all the good advice ITT, and listen to Tigerlee and 5 years from now be kicking himself for being childish.
I agree with this
I'm not planning on buying a house until I have 20% for down payment and a huge emergency fund. And I'm more concerned with paying into my retirement accounts than I am with "owning" a house.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 3:38 pm to NS Who Dat Nation
Taking a penalty just to have a nicer house, not out of necessity seems like a bad idea, but maybe I'm just a dumb college student
Posted on 3/16/13 at 4:44 pm to The Future
quote:
Taking a penalty just to have a nicer house, not out of necessity seems like a bad idea, but maybe I'm just a dumb college student
It is not just about the penalty. Everyone knows that 401k monies are taxable as regular income, but some people are throwing that around as if paying taxes now and paying them in retirement are the exact same. In the vast majority of cases, your tax bracket tends to be significantly lower when you are retired.
Posted on 3/16/13 at 4:46 pm to Powerman
quote:
I'm not planning on buying a house until I have 20% for down payment and a huge emergency fund.
Emergency fund is a plus, but that is far more of a down payment than you need unless you are building your house, in which case its usually required.
If you are buying a house put down 5% and throw the other 15% into an index fund, especially with today's interest rates. Historically you will do considerably better than 4% with your money, which is what your interest will likely be today. Just my $.02
Popular
Back to top


0




