- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 20% down on a house…is it dumb?
Posted on 2/8/22 at 7:53 am to Origins of Asymmetry
Posted on 2/8/22 at 7:53 am to Origins of Asymmetry
Put the least down for a conventional. Invest rest
Posted on 2/8/22 at 9:02 am to MisslePig
I don't think it hurts to have some equity. PMI sucks. Provides good cash flow if wanting to have it as an investment one day.
Getting a heloc to flip property has been my single greatest tool I've used for amazing returns.
Getting a heloc to flip property has been my single greatest tool I've used for amazing returns.
Posted on 2/8/22 at 9:27 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Put the least down for a conventional. Invest rest
The math works for this nearly 100% of the time over the long term
Posted on 2/13/22 at 8:44 am to Billy Blanks
I’m sort of in this boat of thinking of putting less than 20% but for slightly different reasons. The market where I am is moving extremely fast. Homes aren’t lasting more than a week or two. I’m wanting some flexibility with purchasing a house before I’m ready to sell mine in case the ideal home hits the market. I have probably 10-15% in liquid assets than I can put down now but would have much more upon the sale of my current home. Considering only putting that down on a purchase and then getting rid of the PMI once I sell my current house. Also thinking about a HELOC or cash out to raise the capital for 20% down. 401k and IRA are also potential sources I can tap but not sure I want to go that route. What say the MB??
Posted on 2/13/22 at 4:18 pm to lsugradman
I still think the duration of the new mortgage should be a factor for your decision making
If you keep the mortgage 5 years or less, the terms dont really matter so much. Put little down. You arent going to be in a long term marriage with that option.
But if you think you are in a loan that will continue 15+ years in the future, be more picky and sensitive to getting the best terms on your mortggage. Maybe even pay .25% or
75% in points to get a lower rate. Avoid the pmi. Set yourself up for the best financing position.
If you keep the mortgage 5 years or less, the terms dont really matter so much. Put little down. You arent going to be in a long term marriage with that option.
But if you think you are in a loan that will continue 15+ years in the future, be more picky and sensitive to getting the best terms on your mortggage. Maybe even pay .25% or
75% in points to get a lower rate. Avoid the pmi. Set yourself up for the best financing position.
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:48 pm to lsugradman
quote:
What say the MB??
Might want to do some research on bridge loans that apply to your specific situation.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 6:02 am to MisslePig
I put 10% down on my first house and regretted it. I got stuck paying PMI for 8 years due to decrease in property value. If I waited a year I would have had 20%. Large interest payments for 5 years which was frustrating. I refinanced to a 15 year 5 years ago and the principal is dropping fast.
My next house will be 20% down.
My next house will be 20% down.
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 6:04 am
Posted on 2/14/22 at 12:27 pm to Mariner
Put the least amount down you can get by with and have a decent rate, and buy out/pre-pay the PMI if you don't want to pay it every month. Keep the remainder of the "20%" invested.
If the shite ever hits the fan, you will have quicker access to the remainder of the 20% than if it was tied up in equity.
If the shite ever hits the fan, you will have quicker access to the remainder of the 20% than if it was tied up in equity.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 12:43 pm to MisslePig
A lot of basic wisdom is 1st time home buyer just not going to have 20% down generally so it's not a bad idea then to put less down, even if the market might not be a great time to do that.
After that, for 2nd/3rd etc homes, I would put 20% down. By that point it shouldnt be as hard to come up with the money between cash/sale of home later in life (unless you just maybe move a lot or market took big down turn from when you bought current house). PMI is just an extra interest bit basically you're lining someone else's pocket with. Sure you COULD make more in the market and other investments, but also maybe not as well.
I absolutely think there's merit to having a mortgage in such a low interest rate environment even if you have the cash to buy in full and invest difference. But in the sense of paying for someone else's insurance premium, they can go fk themselves
Sometimes PMI isnt terrible, ours was $81/month on our house until we got rid of it after a refinance. But still, $81/mo just flushed down the drain for sure. For others I've seen PMI in the $150-$200 range which is just a little too cringe for me.
After that, for 2nd/3rd etc homes, I would put 20% down. By that point it shouldnt be as hard to come up with the money between cash/sale of home later in life (unless you just maybe move a lot or market took big down turn from when you bought current house). PMI is just an extra interest bit basically you're lining someone else's pocket with. Sure you COULD make more in the market and other investments, but also maybe not as well.
I absolutely think there's merit to having a mortgage in such a low interest rate environment even if you have the cash to buy in full and invest difference. But in the sense of paying for someone else's insurance premium, they can go fk themselves

Sometimes PMI isnt terrible, ours was $81/month on our house until we got rid of it after a refinance. But still, $81/mo just flushed down the drain for sure. For others I've seen PMI in the $150-$200 range which is just a little too cringe for me.
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 2/14/22 at 1:01 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
After that, for 2nd/3rd etc homes, I would put 20% down.
In defiance of basic mathematics no less

Posted on 2/14/22 at 1:45 pm to go ta hell ole miss
Debt in the hands of smart people, is a great asset. In the hands of the reckless or unknowing, isn't a bad one.
I generally think the decision making should be this:
(1) What are you EXTREMELY comfortable making on a monthly housing carry cost? Simple formula - > Take your monthly, after tax income and multiply by .25. Then, once you figure out what your ideal payment is, multiply that number by 1.1 (the average cost of annual upkeep an maintenance.
For example: $10,000 (after-tax, after 401(k) income x .25 = $2500. $2500 x 1.1 = $2,750. So, if you put down 5% on a house where your monthly payment is $2,500, you are likely looking at a home in the $425,000 range in terms of value at a 3.5% interest rate.
(2) Once you do that, it's basically a cost of capital analysis... You're paying a 3.5% interest charge for a house that, if you include upkeep (can be significant) only goes up over a 10-year average... roughly 3-5%. That is great as an inflation hedge, but if you consider transaction costs if you move, it's not a really an ideal investment considering the market has appreciated 10% on average YoY.
If you read "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," you'll see why a house isn't really an asset, because in general it doesn't make you that much money compared to easily found alternatives.
But to answer your question, 5% down is really a determination of whether or not it still puts you in a spot to save 25% of your after-tax, after retirement income to deploy towards investment opportunities.
I generally think the decision making should be this:
(1) What are you EXTREMELY comfortable making on a monthly housing carry cost? Simple formula - > Take your monthly, after tax income and multiply by .25. Then, once you figure out what your ideal payment is, multiply that number by 1.1 (the average cost of annual upkeep an maintenance.
For example: $10,000 (after-tax, after 401(k) income x .25 = $2500. $2500 x 1.1 = $2,750. So, if you put down 5% on a house where your monthly payment is $2,500, you are likely looking at a home in the $425,000 range in terms of value at a 3.5% interest rate.
(2) Once you do that, it's basically a cost of capital analysis... You're paying a 3.5% interest charge for a house that, if you include upkeep (can be significant) only goes up over a 10-year average... roughly 3-5%. That is great as an inflation hedge, but if you consider transaction costs if you move, it's not a really an ideal investment considering the market has appreciated 10% on average YoY.
If you read "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," you'll see why a house isn't really an asset, because in general it doesn't make you that much money compared to easily found alternatives.
But to answer your question, 5% down is really a determination of whether or not it still puts you in a spot to save 25% of your after-tax, after retirement income to deploy towards investment opportunities.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 1:49 pm to ATLabama
quote:
If you read "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," you'll see why a house isn't really an asset, because in general it doesn't make you that much money compared to easily found alternatives.
Correct
Some people have just been very fortunate with the timing in their respective markets
Without rapid appreciation it's just a liability
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:28 pm to dandan
quote:
You avoid pmi with 20% down
I got a loan through Huntington Banks with only 15% down and no PMI.
Popular
Back to top
