- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why isn’t Woodward getting more hate?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:43 pm to LSUfan2008
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:43 pm to LSUfan2008
He had no choice with basketball. NCAA was ready to hammer LSU, so to save face, Will Wade had to go.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:45 pm to EastWestConnection
quote:
ive been a pretty big Woodward hater , besides JJ and KM of course, but I have to admit I was surprised and pleased how fast he pulled the trigger on BK.
It sure looked like it came from the Governor's Mansion.
And I haven't noticed any shortage of Woodward hate around here. Not quite to Alleva levels but SW is just incompetent. Alleva was far worse than that.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:48 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Funny. Oregon didn’t make the same risk averse hire.
Georgia didn’t.
Ohio State didn’t
Texas didn’t.
Notre Dame didn’t.
Why did you include Texas in this post? Then you have two internal promotions (we've done that before, everyone hated it) and Kirby going back to his alma mater. That leaves Lanning. cool
quote:
ots of bad jobs you included there.
lots of good ones too
quote:
Your mentality is what causes us to spend $50 million to buyout a coach when it doesn’t work.
so if we hire an assistant with no head coaching experience and he fails, you will not blame Woodward for taking the chance. Just so we're clear
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:50 pm to saturncube21
quote:
Why isn’t Woodward getting more hate?
Its been burning in my soul since the Will Wade/McMahon debacle. We are out there.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:50 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
When you close off and limit your search you end up having to pay massive money with massive buyouts
it's not your money. why do you care how much other people pay for buyouts?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:51 pm to king47
That’s good but SAS is a legit retarded person so I’m not sure he counts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:55 pm to baseballcoach23
There are those of us LSU fans that love College basketball. Never gunna be okay with Woodward after Wade debacle. Take the sanctions keep the coach, NCAA was powerless during NIL transition at that time.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:02 pm to saturncube21
I think kickbacks are involved.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:05 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Why did you include Texas in this post?
What did he do the five years before texas hired him?
quote:
so if we hire an assistant with no head coaching experience and he fails, you will not blame Woodward for taking the chance. Just so we're clear
As long as he doesn’t saddle us with a massive buyout.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:05 pm to saturncube21
Dude he is a walking dead man
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:06 pm to saturncube21
He will get a lot more if he goes anywhere near that dumbass Napier.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:06 pm to lsufball19
quote:
it's not your money. why do you care how much other people pay for buyouts?
Buyout $ means less $ for players.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:06 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
What did he do the five years before texas hired him?
oh so now we're moving the goalposts and pretending that he didn't have almost a decade of power conference HC experience, one stop being at a blue blood. He's basically the same as Dan Lanning
quote:
As long as he doesn’t saddle us with a massive buyout.
So, doesn't really matter if we win as long as our boosters (not you) have to pay less next time we're hiring a coach.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:08 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Buyout $ means less $ for players.
according to whom? Your assumption? Do you really think that wasn't discussed when pulling the trigger to fire Kelly? this isn't the zero sum game you think it is. if it was, we'd never be in a position to fire a coach
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:10 pm to Imber
Responsible for one of the largest, which is Kelly. You know Google is free.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:11 pm to lsufball19
quote:
So, doesn't really matter if we win as long as our boosters (not you) have to pay less next time we're hiring a coach
Absolutely it matters if we win.
However it’s much raiser to swallow losing if you can flush a decision down the drain easily.
Hiring the massive contract big name has just as many misses as successes. Only difference between hiring an up and comer is it’s WAY more expensive to admit your mistake AND it’s harder to buy talent.
20 years ago you didn’t have to pay the roster (or at least minimally pay the roster)
Now you have to.
There is too many variables that go into a coaches success that it’s not worth it. There is no sure thing that will translate.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:18 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
However it’s much raiser to swallow losing if you can flush a decision down the drain easily.
signed the Tennessee Volunteers
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:22 pm to lsufball19
quote:
it's not your money. why do you care
You sound like a Liberal--or SW
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:23 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Sylvester Croom
Jeff Lebby
Your going to compare Miss State with the coaching situation at LSU?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:26 pm to jrobic4
quote:
You sound like a Liberal--or SW
lol wat?
Rich boosters spending their own money on things shouldn't matter to any of us. If they want to flush their own money down the toilet to fix bad hires they wanted, then who am i to care if they get burned? Had we done what most people wanted, we'd be firing Billy Napier this year and looking for another coach. The same boosters would be taking care of the buyout.
How do you think me not caring how they spend their money makes me a "liberal"
My actual taxes are used to fund government programs. Your TAF ticket donation I can assure you isn't being used to fund Kelly's buyout, so maybe relax.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 1:27 pm
Popular
Back to top


1




