- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is no one acknowledging Zach Mettenberger???
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:09 pm to Creed Bratton
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:09 pm to Creed Bratton
quote:
Zach Mettenberger???
Who? Never heard of him.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:12 pm to Suntiger
Because Lee is a 10th year senior and he's going to run the option like Andrew Hatch, who got hurt. Then, METT WILL TAKE CENTER STAGE!!!!!
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:12 pm to Suntiger
quote:I think he's in that Adam Sandler channukah song.
Posted by Suntiger
quote:
Zach Mettenberger???
Who? Never heard of him.
"Zach Mettenberger lights the menora...."
IDK who he is though; he must be famous though or he wouldn't be in the song right?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:12 pm to TigerKnights
It is a 50% increase, roughly. An additional 50% is 3900 when applied to 2600. Just sayin...
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:12 pm to Suntiger
Mett will play. If he plays well, he will play alot. Don't worry about Mett.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:13 pm to Creed Bratton
CreedBatton,
I do not know where you learned math. But if I have 2600 yards, and I increase (i.e.exaggerate) it by 50%, I come to 3,900 yards (~4,000).
But if I take 2,600 yards, and increase/exaggerate it by 35% (like you think I should), that will take me to only 3,510 yards.
You know, if you are not very good at math, a calculator can be your friend.

I do not know where you learned math. But if I have 2600 yards, and I increase (i.e.exaggerate) it by 50%, I come to 3,900 yards (~4,000).
But if I take 2,600 yards, and increase/exaggerate it by 35% (like you think I should), that will take me to only 3,510 yards.
You know, if you are not very good at math, a calculator can be your friend.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:14 pm to Creed Bratton
Lee and Mett are both the same style of passer, why would we see a dual QB system where we only have pocket passers?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:15 pm to kevlanmei
And in fact, I think his JC passing total was about 2,650 yards. If so, that means it is almost an exact 50% increase to get to 4,000 yards.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:15 pm to TigerWilson88
I really hope Mett gets some playing time but honestly, I don't care what his numbers were, there is no JUCO defense that even comes close to the SEC and it will take a lot of practice against our #1 D for him to get ready. I don't think it will happen as much as I would like to think Mett is ready.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:17 pm to kevlanmei
My apologies. That is correct. I am working at the moment and was not calculating correctly.
:tailbetweenlegs:
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:18 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I honestly think he should just be the starter at this point. Take our lumps now.
That's stupid. JL should start and play. If he can't do it I say THEN bring on METT!!!
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:18 pm to sicboy
quote:
Well, for all the Mett disciples, this is best case scenario.
And, somewhat tongue in cheek - Lee starts and Mett gets significant reps this year is maximizing "experience" at the QB position. Next year Jefferson returns as a 5th year senior, Mett a Junior and Rivers and Randall as RSFr.
In all seriousness, I know that JJ's absence from the team will either be fairly brief (October) or permanent. However, out of our top 3 QBs, JJ can redshirt, Lee and Mett cannot.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:19 pm to Creed Bratton
Because he isnt going to play
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:23 pm to Ace Midnight
JJ and the other JJ (Josh) are suspended indefinitely. I don't think Jefferson will be back. 
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:24 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I honestly think he should just be the starter at this point. Take our lumps now.
Agreed. Give me 3 years of Mett
Posted on 8/26/11 at 1:27 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
Agreed. Give me 3 years of Mett
I'll give you 3 to play 3
Posted on 8/26/11 at 2:00 pm to NicoBlues
quote:
because he has never played a down of division 1a ball.
so when does that excuse not matter anymore?
he's got to play at some point
Popular
Back to top


4






