- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/27/16 at 2:54 pm to SECond2none™
quote:
You remember you said you've never seen it enforced that way?
No, I don't remember saying that actually.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 2:57 pm to LNCHBOX
Hope you learned something today 
Posted on 9/27/16 at 2:57 pm to SECond2none™
Not from you.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 2:59 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:06 pm to Festus
Ok so we are all clear on this, you are saying the rule for starting the ball on the snap only applies is a ten second runoff is declined?
Where is the NCAA rules book online? Can someone post a link?
Did we ever determine if Auburn got 5 downs in the first half btw?
For once bad officiating went in our favor but doesn't happen often.
Where is the NCAA rules book online? Can someone post a link?
Did we ever determine if Auburn got 5 downs in the first half btw?
For once bad officiating went in our favor but doesn't happen often.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:09 pm to LNCHBOX
The links are older, but I'm not aware of there being any rule changes in that regard since the latest link. And at the moment, ain't no way I can go through the entire NCAA rulebook but when I get home if I got some time I might try to take a look. 
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:10 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Ok so we are all clear on this, you are saying the rule for starting the ball on the snap only applies is a ten second runoff is declined?
No, I'm not talking about that at all. I'm talking about the clock not stopping when Dural went out of bounds, and stating it's because basically it was ruled that his forward progress had been stopped.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:12 pm to Festus
quote:
The links are older, but I'm not aware of there being any rule changes in that regard since the latest link. And at the moment, ain't no way I can go through the entire NCAA rulebook but when I get home if I got some time I might try to take a look.
I tried copying some of the phrases you had, no luck. Tried the looking at the rule numbers by Rule, Section, Article; also no luck. I'm sure it's still in there, but just like college text books, they changed just enough to make you need the new one.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:15 pm to LNCHBOX
Rule 4, Section 1, Article 3:
If the ball becomes dead due to a runners forward progress being stopped then it's the exact same as the runner being tackled in bounds.
quote:
Ball Declared Dead ARTICLE 3. A live ball becomes dead and an official shall sound his whistle or declare it dead: a. When it goes out of bounds other than a kick that scores a field goal after touching the uprights or crossbar; when a ball carrier is out of bounds; or when a ball carrier is so held that his forward progress is stopped. When in question, the ball is dead (A.R. 4-2-1-II).
If the ball becomes dead due to a runners forward progress being stopped then it's the exact same as the runner being tackled in bounds.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:16 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Ok so we are all clear on this, you are saying the rule for starting the ball on the snap only applies is a ten second runoff is declined?
I'm saying that, yes.
quote:
Where is the NCAA rules book online? Can someone post a link?
Good luck
quote:
Did we ever determine if Auburn got 5 downs in the first half btw?
No, they didn't. ESPN marked a 1st down on what was 3rd and 1.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:17 pm to idlewatcher
Got a loss too
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:25 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I tried copying some of the phrases you had, no luck. Tried the looking at the rule numbers by Rule, Section, Article; also no luck. I'm sure it's still in there, but just like college text books, they changed just enough to make you need the new one.
Check FR-57 and FR-49.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:28 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
because the rule is the clock stops when the referee signals the play is over, not when the WR is down. There's always a slight delay for that to occur. Again, this happens all the time.
In that case, it should have been zero. There's been a lot of complaining about the "homer scorekeeper", but he definitely stopped it at :01 before the official signaled.
Second question: is clock status reviewable? i.e. could they rule that the ref waited too long to officially signal the play over?
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:28 pm to slackster
You and UP To Par are correct, this is directly addressed on page FR-57.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:35 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Second question: is clock status reviewable? i.e. could they rule that the ref waited too long to officially signal the play over?
Apparently any egregious clock issues are reviewable. Remember the Kick-6 getting a second put back on the clock?
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:38 pm to slackster
quote:
Apparently any egregious clock issues are reviewable. Remember the Kick-6 getting a second put back on the clock?
Yeah, so that makes me think the 1st 4th down play should have been reviewed. It was WAY after he was down that the official signaled the play dead.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:55 pm to Big Scrub TX
Instead of everyone quoting the same rules over and over again could we get a Gif of the play in the thread?
Posted on 9/27/16 at 3:59 pm to Florida225
quote:
Instead of everyone quoting the same rules over and over again could we get a Gif of the play in the thread?
I'm talking about a different play.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News