Started By
Message

re: What's the latest on McMullen?

Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by Swat5
Houston
Member since May 2010
2417 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:42 pm to
How am I supposed to know there is some thread about a tweet when it's nowhere to be seen?...oh jeez..never mind...futile arguing with the mentally ill. I need a nap
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

How am I supposed to know there is some thread about a tweet when it's nowhere to be seen?...oh jeez..never mind...futile arguing with the mentally ill. I need a nap

1. Look beyond the first page of the Rant, since it was on the second page.
2. Use the search function to see if there are any more recent developments.
Posted by Swat5
Houston
Member since May 2010
2417 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Right, so find the one that was from today. That thread contains an update from - wait for it - TODAY


ok..one more. So you're saying i log in and there is a thread titled "what's the latest on McMullen" and there are 15 plus pages and even though the first pages are from a few days ago...im not supposed to think maybe an update from today might be in the last few pages?

wow
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40143 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

2. Use the search function to see if there are any more recent developments.


To be fair, the search function blows.

On second thought, I could see the frustration of going through 16 pages of bickering and finding no information on McMullen.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16140 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I think I like dnm3305 more than you.


Thank you lsu2006. A severe backhanded compliment, but I'll take it. Youre not too bad for being black.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40143 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:54 pm to
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16140 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:56 pm to
lol, clearly im joking.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40143 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

lol, clearly im joking.


Ohhhh I've never encountered sarcasm before, thanks.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16140 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Ohhhh I've never encountered sarcasm before, thanks.


Are you serious, or was that sarcastic?
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40143 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Are you serious, or was that sarcastic?


I was being SOOOOOO serious.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16140 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I was being SOOOOOO serious.


Ahhhh, so you WERE being serious.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Thank you lsu2006. A severe backhanded compliment, but I'll take it. Youre not too bad for being black.



I now like dnm3305. I don't agree with all of his baseball ideas, but all in all seems like an allright guy.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16140 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 5:28 pm to
quote:



I now like dnm3305. I don't agree with all of his baseball ideas, but all in all seems like an allright guy


Cheers mate.
and....
This post was edited on 6/6/13 at 5:29 pm
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40143 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

I now like dnm3305. I don't agree with all of his baseball ideas, but all in all seems like an allright guy.


I can get on board with that
Posted by cajdav1
NOLA
Member since Feb 2004
1933 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 7:13 pm to
I actually enjoyed reading this thread. I also love the debates between old school baseball purists and the techno wizards. Both have a lot of merit to their ideas.

Many a manager has had to answer questions about their lineup. And many a manger has had to answer tough questions about substitutions and pitching matchups. The debate will never die and that is a good thing.


I see some of these new thoughts creeping into the game now and then and believe we will see more a the game goes on.
Posted by cajdav1
NOLA
Member since Feb 2004
1933 posts
Posted on 6/6/13 at 8:35 pm to
I actually enjoyed reading this thread. I also love the debates between old school baseball purists and the techno wizards. Both have a lot of merit to their ideas.

Many a manager has had to answer questions about their lineup. And many a manger has had to answer tough questions about substitutions and pitching matchups. The debate will never die and that is a good thing.


I see some of these new thoughts creeping into the game now and then and believe we will see more a the game goes on.
Posted by redfieldk717
Alec Box
Member since Oct 2011
28117 posts
Posted on 6/7/13 at 8:17 pm to
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
15409 posts
Posted on 6/7/13 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Laird anywhere near the top of the lineup is a mistake, period. And yes, the "stats" back that claim up.


Ummmm. You were saying?
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 17Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram