- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:26 pm to PurpleAndGold86
Well I wish the OP would change the title to "douchebags arguing about stuff no one cares about".
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:27 pm to dnm3305
quote:
You could have an inning with Laird leading off from the 9 hole, then Ibarra, Bregman, Katz, and Rhymes all in a row.
Yeah, the first inning.
You are acting like that would be a great scenario in the fourth to have Laird leadoff from the nine hole. Yet, you don't want Laird in the leadoff spot in the lineup. This is awesome.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:28 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
You said that. Not me. You literally just called him an outmaking machine. I clearly indicated I think his OBP of .355 is worthy of the leadoff spot. You suggested otherwise. You aren't very smart.
Im sure it's worthy for a team like Oklahoma that doesnt have many good hitters, but here at LSU, where we have alot of good hitters, you can shuffle the lineup to maximize it's potential. That means putting high OBP guys in the front and low OBP guys in the back. It shouldnt be this hard.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:29 pm to Swat5
quote:
Well I wish the OP would change the title to "douchebags arguing about stuff no one cares about".
So you don't care, yet you came in the thread and posted multiple times? Pay attention in class frat boy.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:30 pm to PurpleAndGold86
I came to the thread to find out about McMullen...and I kept backing up page after page and still only saw you girls arguing. Start another fricking thread
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:30 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
You are acting like that would be a great scenario in the fourth to have Laird leadoff from the nine hole. Yet, you don't want Laird in the leadoff spot in the lineup. This is awesome.
No I dont. I dont think it would be a great scenario, I was merely pointing out everyone could have their cake and eat it too. The 9 hole isnt a bad spot for Laird. That's why i didnt put him in the 7 or 8 spot. He's not as bad a hitter Ross or Stevenson. As the lineup turns over, and approaches the top again, it's not a bad idea to put a guy like Laird in the 9 hole.
This post was edited on 6/6/13 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:31 pm to Swat5
quote:
I came to the thread to find out about McMullen
Then read the first page.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:33 pm to Swat5
quote:
I came to the thread to find out about McMullen...and I kept backing up page after page and still only saw you girls arguing. Start another fricking thread
Then why don't you click on the thread that is titled you "McMullen Update" which contains a tweet released today regarding the current status of McMullen you dumbass POS.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:34 pm to PurpleAndGold86
Look truce man. I dont mind a good debate and you obviously dont either. We're from two different schools of thought. We're both tugging on the same rope and want the Tigers to kick some Sooner arse.

This post was edited on 6/6/13 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:34 pm to PurpleAndGold86
I don't see that thread anywhere
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:35 pm to dnm3305
No doubt man. I'm not mad in the least. You are one of the first people that has actually been able to debate baseball (or anything on this website for that matter) without turning into a complete POS. I disagree with you on LSUs lineup, but that doesn't matter.

Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:36 pm to Swat5
quote:
I don't see that thread anywhere
Well if you were intelligent you would realize there is a search function at the top of the page. Plug in the title that I gave you and try clicking "search". That would be an excellent start to finding that thread.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:38 pm to PurpleAndGold86
So I see a thread about the latest about McMullen..but I'm supposed to go to search for a different one because you morons have hijacked this one? Wow... You're a real piece of work
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:39 pm to Swat5
quote:
So I see a thread about the latest about McMullen..but I'm supposed to go to search for a different one because you morons have hijacked this one? Wow... You're a real piece of work
Uhhh you know you don't have to read all 16 pages, right? You can get all of your desired information in the first 2 pages (probably just the first page.)
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:40 pm to lsu2006
So what's the date from the first 2 pages? Looks like 2 days ago
This post was edited on 6/6/13 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:40 pm to Swat5
quote:No you need to go to that one because the individual that found the tweet about his status decided to start a new thread with that subject line so that people could see the direct tweet in an OP.
but I'm supposed to go to search for a different one because you morons have hijacked this one?
quote:
You're a real piece of work
You are a fricking idiot, so we're even.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:42 pm to Swat5
quote:
Swat5
I think I like dnm3305 more than you.
Posted on 6/6/13 at 4:42 pm to Swat5
quote:
So what's the date from the first 2 pages? Looks like 2 days ago
Right, so find the one that was from today. That thread contains an update from - wait for it - TODAY.
Popular
Back to top


0



