- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What will be your reaction if RJ Jackson
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
play on the field still trumps all to me
So you are comparing HS play to College play. Okay...

quote:
up to this point rj has shown he can come in on running plays and block. that is his consistency
And that is pretty improtant to a power running team, don't you think?
quote:
i'm talking regular season
You are assuming that a freshman will come in and learn everything he needs to learn in 4 weeks of fall camp before the start of the season. You seem quick to want to blame the coaches if RR doesn't start the seaon as the #3 or #4 WR. It's up to RR to learn a very complex multiple offense if he wants to see the field. With our young QB's the last thing we need is a WR out there running the wrong routes.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
certain biases like starting upperclassmen who are inferior early because they are upperclassmen
I don't have a problem with giving the upperclassman a start early. Who plays more is obviously much more important.
quote:
i've heard that RJ will be the #4 WR over randall. that just doesn't seem to be right unless he's turns his body around
First off, who is #3?
Secondly, how in the world could this have been decided already? From what kind of source did you hear this? Is this an initial depth chart issue? Were you told that this is what it would be like for game 1?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:54 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
And that is pretty improtant to a power running team, don't you think?
the only time RJ has seen the field is in 4-5 WR sets, which is predicated on crowton's SPREAD PASSING scheme
and the #1 important aspect of being a WR is being a good receiver. blocking is WAAAY behind that
quote:
You are assuming that a freshman will come in and learn everything he needs to learn in 4 weeks of fall camp before the start of the season. You seem quick to want to blame the coaches if RR doesn't start the seaon as the #3 or #4 WR. It's up to RR to learn a very complex multiple offense if he wants to see the field. With our young QB's the last thing we need is a WR out there running the wrong routes.
is there any evidence that RJ jackson knows the entire offense and what routes to run against the coverages he faces?
have you seen him do this in a live game before?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:54 pm to moneyg
quote:
who is #3?
chris mitchell
Posted on 7/15/09 at 1:56 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
quote:
LaFell
Toliver
Randle
Chris Tolliver
Chris Mitchell
Don't forget about DeAngelo Peterson. He may have been moved to TE, but he is still gonna be a receiving threat.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 2:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
is there any evidence that RJ jackson knows the entire offense and what routes to run against the coverages he faces?
I'm going to assume that the fact he is still on the team for a 5th year is indicative of this...
is there any evidence that this is anything other than another Hester/Williams thread in disguise?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the only time RJ has seen the field is in 4-5 WR sets, which is predicated on crowton's SPREAD PASSING scheme
and the #1 important aspect of being a WR is being a good receiver. blocking is WAAAY behind that
We run most of our WR screens, WR reverses and WR sweeps out of our 4-5 WR sets and WR blocking is KEY to those plays hiting for big gainers.
quote:
is there any evidence that RJ jackson knows the entire offense and what routes to run against the coverages he faces?
I agree with ForeLSU on this...If they have him on the field as a 5th year player, that is evidence he knows what to do.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP, did you make a bet with someone that you could start a 5 page thread on the rant before 4:00?
RJ has caught something like two passes in three years. What makes you possibly think that he will get playing time over Randle?
RJ has caught something like two passes in three years. What makes you possibly think that he will get playing time over Randle?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What will be your reaction if RJ Jackson
starts over randle this year while looking like the same RJ Jackson he's always looked like?
My reaction would be to support CLM if he and Crowton decide that RJ is starting ahead of RRandle. If they think he deserves the start there is a good reason for it.
Anyone thinking otherwise should STFU.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 4:15 pm to rtgr
RJ would have started in 2006 at RB had he not blown his knee.
I don't know where yal are getting his body has let him go, he's one of the strongest players on the team.
He just got lost in the shuffle after he got hurt. if he actually gets a chance to do something other than block in a game i think he'll surprise some people. they tried in the peach bowl but the play got blown up.
I don't know where yal are getting his body has let him go, he's one of the strongest players on the team.
He just got lost in the shuffle after he got hurt. if he actually gets a chance to do something other than block in a game i think he'll surprise some people. they tried in the peach bowl but the play got blown up.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 6:32 pm to rtgr
quote:
My reaction would be to support CLM if he and Crowton decide that RJ is starting ahead of RRandle. If they think he deserves the start there is a good reason for it.
Anyone thinking otherwise should STFU.
rule #1:
don't question the LSU coaches.
EVER.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
My reaction wont change, I trust the coaches decision and if RJ is on the field instead of Randle that means that RJ has impressed them more.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 6:42 pm to easy money
quote:I also would like to see him get on the field this year...hey, it's a new year, maybe he has 'turned it around' he's a Tiger & has stuck it out, give him a chance to show his stuff, I don't count out anyone...
i'd like to see the guy get a chance personally
Posted on 7/15/09 at 8:59 pm to That LSU Guy
Why do we even have threads like this when we could be talking about JJ vs JL and other topics related to JJ vs JL?
Posted on 7/15/09 at 9:21 pm to Papa Purple and Gold
quote:on?
the kid's an athlete and too good to keep off the bench... difference maker
Posted on 7/16/09 at 7:43 am to moneyg
quote:
how in the world could this have been decided already? From what kind of source did you hear this? Is this an initial depth chart issue? Were you told that this is what it would be like for game 1?
Posted on 7/16/09 at 7:50 am to moneyg
1. this is the inside info as of now
2. this is still hypothetical-based
i just picked the most glaring example of potential "wtf" depth chart positioning that i could think of this year
many positions seem safe. the main competition will be at CB and DT, 2 positions that require a ton of subjectivity in evaluation that aren't worth arguing over until kids start playing (however last year we did run into this situation with PP, but we can all blame maleveto for that mistake)
2. this is still hypothetical-based
i just picked the most glaring example of potential "wtf" depth chart positioning that i could think of this year
many positions seem safe. the main competition will be at CB and DT, 2 positions that require a ton of subjectivity in evaluation that aren't worth arguing over until kids start playing (however last year we did run into this situation with PP, but we can all blame maleveto for that mistake)
Posted on 7/16/09 at 9:13 am to Keys Open Doors
YE OF SUCH LITTLE FAITH.RR WILL BE FINE.
Posted on 7/16/09 at 9:18 am to TheDoc
quote:
rule #1:
don't question the LSU coaches.
EVER.
Not unless you have the credentials to do so.
BTW, nobody on these boards has them.
So shut up, sonnyboy.
Popular
Back to top
