re: We need a lawyer on here to start a class action on behalf of unvaxxed fans...

1st to the OP -- a class action has to claim statutorily recognized relief on behalf of a large number of people. What claims? That they can't go to a football game? Go find me a statute or a law anywhere that says denial of the right to see a football game based on not being vaxed for COVID is a recoverable remedy. Now there are going to be accommodation issues ... and LSU would be best to take those into account. But accommodations must be in the form of medical reasons or sincerely held religious beliefs. And I doubt that football qualifies as a religious excuse.

To the poster who said this --

quote:

---

You think its funny that the vaxxed are spreading this shite far and wide and the idiots running this State and University are too stupid to understand this? People like you are the reason we are a laughing stock in this Nation. Science is science. The vaxxed are spreading this shite too.

---

... and then the link to the paper. But see the 1st comment --

quote:

---

This paper does not compare the viral loads of those infected with the Delta variant in the two populations: vaccinated and have delta; unvaccinated and have delta. This compares the viral load to the vaccinated who are infected with delta to the unvaccinated who were infected with older strains in 2020.

---

No one disputes that the vaxxed can spread. But you need to read the paper. And the arse clown Dr. Peter McCullough who authors that blog?

quote:

---

Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation. McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that person under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread. Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the conservative John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines. In May 2021 McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence," including that survivors cannot be re-infected and so do not require vaccination and that the vaccine is dangerous. In an interview on the Fox News program Tucker Carlson Tonight in May 2021, McCullough claimed that hydroxychloroquine is effective for treating COVID-19 despite there being no supporting evidence. McCullough later made appearances on the Fox News program The Ingraham Angle; McCullough contradicted public health recommendations, for example when asked about the aggressive spread of COVID-19 among children, by suggesting that healthy persons under 30 had no need for a vaccine, and when asked about the relative merits of vaccination-induced immunity versus "natural" (survivor) immunity, by disputing the necessity of vaccinations to achieve herd immunity.

---

Peter the arse

quote:

---

And you won't watch the videos of doctors in exponentially higher numbers explaining why it is....

---

I have watched many videos of doctors on both sides of the fence. But it isn't the doctors opinions, whether pro or con, that are important for you to consider. It is the facts and the data. You see doctors (and those in the medical field in general) are people. Some of them are genuinely concerned for your well-being. Some are greedy sons of bitches who will say or do whatever if it gets them more money, including give you treatments that are harmful, even fatal. Moderna absolutely knows MRNA vaccines are harmful, even fatal. So does the medical field in general These 2 medical field publications bear that out very clearly.

STAT news 1

quote:

---

Founded in 2012, Moderna reached unicorn status — a $1 billion valuation — in just two years, faster than Uber, Dropbox, and Lyft, according to CB Insights. The company’s premise: Using custom-built strands of messenger RNA, known as mRNA, it aims to turn the body’s cells into ad hoc drug factories, compelling them to produce the proteins needed to treat a wide variety of diseases.

But mRNA is a tricky technology. Several major pharmaceutical companies have tried and abandoned the idea, struggling to get mRNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects. In order to protect mRNA molecules from the body’s natural defenses, drug developers must wrap them in a protective casing. For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients.

---

STAT news 2

quote:

---

Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years.

Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche.

---

But you can't sue Moderna (or any of the other companies making vaccines) if their vaccine harms or kills people, so they make bank on these vaccines with no liability.

I'll tell you what. You watch this video by Dr. Peter McCullough (25 minutes) and I'll watch any other doctor video you want of approximately the same amount of time. You can quiz me even to prove I watched it, and I'll quiz you.

How did that post get so many upvotes? Sheesh.