
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We can talk about baker’s initial game plan but my question is
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:58 am
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:58 am
Why did he go back to the soft zone when we came back and tied the game 24-24? Being aggressive, blitzing and playing man spearheaded the comeback and when we finally came back he goes into a shell and plays soft coverage ? I just don’t understand why was baker so fixated on that being the base defense against a qb like Trinidad.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 9:01 am
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:59 am to Cd104
Can’t believe we basically paid to keep this guy away from Tulane lmao
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:59 am to Cd104
People revert to their true selves when the chips are in the middle
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:09 am to Cd104
He didn't want to give up a big play after tying the game.
I'm not saying it's right but .....
I'm not saying it's right but .....
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 9:20 am
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:23 am to Cd104
I think because of how much time was left, we were playing to hold them to a field goal. Not saying I agree with doing that given how badly Chambliss was torching that soft zone, but with the offense rolling how it was, holding them to a field goal would have put us in a great spot with 6 minutes remaining.
I think we should have played them more straight up the entire way, but I somewhat follow the thought process with that even though I disagree with it.
I think we should have played them more straight up the entire way, but I somewhat follow the thought process with that even though I disagree with it.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:26 am to MrKnowItAll
quote:
He didn't want to give up a big play after tying the game.
I'm not saying it's right but ..
I'll say it. It was a boneheaded strategy. So you're willing to give up a 7 minute touchdown drive to lose the game vs a chance to get a three and out. or a big play touchdown that would leave time on the clock for us to mount a comeback. Strategy wise, the approach he took made no sense.

Popular
Back to top
5






