Started By
Message
locked post

UW will win 6 games MAX.. probably 4 or 5....

Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:30 pm
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:30 pm
LSU
Idaho
USC
Stanford
Notre Dame
Arizona
Arizona State
Oregon
UCLA
Oregon State
Washington State
California

they arent going to beat Notre Dame, USC, Cal, Oregon, Oregon St or Az St. that leaves UCLA, Wash St, Arizona, Stanford, and Idaho. they might not win all of those either... but they might win one im not expecting them to.

Locker is great, but i dont think teams will play them with as horrible play calling and schemes as we did.

i think some of you are going overboard with the UW hype
Posted by Monier187
Ville Platte, LA
Member since Sep 2007
401 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:40 pm to
Thanks Saban. Now there's no need for them to play the games. There was no way Alabama loses to ULM. No way App state beats Michigan, but it happened.
Posted by LSU Tiger 216
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
4026 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:41 pm to
Wrong board
Posted by Gamer
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
2013 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:42 pm to
And what does this have to do with LSU?
Posted by Walt OReilly
Poplarville, MS
Member since Oct 2005
124541 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:42 pm to
The more you post...The more you get on my nerves
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278528 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:45 pm to
going from 0 to even 4 or 5 is awesome

ask gordy
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

The more you post...The more you get on my nerves


then we are even, because the more i see of bill o'reilly the more he gets on my nerves
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

going from 0 to even 4 or 5 is awesome


going from zero wins to 4 or 5 IS awesome. its a giant step in the right direction

still, UW isnt as good as some of you are making them out to be
Posted by LSU1018
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
7222 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:46 pm to
All those games that they are "not" going to win, I will take a bet with you that they will win at least one of those games. I'm sure someone on this board would be willing to escrow.
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

All those games that they are "not" going to win, I will take a bet with you that they will win at least one of those games


dude, if you read my post you will see we agree. i dont think they will lose all the games i predict them to lose, and i dont expect them to win all the games i expect them to win.

at the end of the day i give them 4 or 5 wins. MAYBE 6.

some of you are trying to make yourself feel better about this game by convincing yourselves UW is a good team.

they just arent. our playcalling and adjustments and schemes were absolutely horrible.

but drink all the kool aid you want
Posted by homeyhomes
Member since Nov 2005
1314 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:49 pm to
and you know this how?
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:50 pm to
because i am from the future.
Posted by south bama tiger
Member since May 2008
6646 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:50 pm to
I could see them wining 7 games, or they could win 4. There are some games that could go either way. I think teams like UCLA and Arizona are overrated.

LSU-L
Idaho-W
USC-L
Stanford-W/L
Notre Dame-L
Arizona-W
Arizona State-W/L
Oregon-W/L
UCLA-W
Oregon State-W/L
Washington State-W
California-L
Posted by zem
Seattle
Member since Aug 2009
22 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:55 pm to
UW will beat Arizona but not Arizona State? There goes your credibility. Flip that, and you might have something. I'll take five wins this year any day of the week. 2010 is where UW makes some noise.
Posted by tigermike200444
baton rouge
Member since Dec 2003
9106 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:57 pm to
they may catch usc at the right time
Posted by mdtiger1
Great Northwest Louisiana
Member since Jan 2005
1434 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 7:02 pm to
I would like to go on record as saying the originator of this post has a stupid, and anatomically impossible, handle. I keep waiting for "it" to make a sensible remark that has not been copied or is original. I would cringe if someone asked me my handle and I had to answer with his. It is, without doubt, the most reprehensible and crude "name" on this board. His mother should spank his little hiney!
Posted by mdtiger1
Great Northwest Louisiana
Member since Jan 2005
1434 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 7:05 pm to
I'm thinking the ND game could be a win in the WIllingham Bowl. I don't think I will be taking his advice on much. Name ONE scheme and/or play that was wrong and detail it for us. Bet you don't know a wishbone from a funnybone!
Posted by Peachtree Tiger
Member since Jan 2004
3232 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 7:08 pm to
If you say so, it must me true.
Posted by sabans ovaries
Member since Aug 2009
417 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

It is, without doubt, the most reprehensible and crude "name" on this board


i like my name that much more now
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18148 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 7:12 pm to
not too convinced on Notre Dame going undefeated as Dr. Lou suggests. in fact i think wash may just cost charlie his job.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram