- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC is good. Possibly very good.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:00 am to mcspufftiger7
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:00 am to mcspufftiger7
Said that about Florida State the last two years. Florida State is good. Possibly very good.
1
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:00 am to mcspufftiger7
USC has a 59% blue chip ratio. LSU is 70%. The blue chip ratio does not include transfers. USC transfers had a big impact on the game, especially on defense, last Sunday night.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:01 am to paulb52
quote:
Said that about Florida State the last two years. Florida State is good. Possibly very good.
We keep catching these teams when they are peaking.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:16 am to mcspufftiger7
No they're not, they'll lose 3 or more games this year.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:17 am to mcspufftiger7
WE GOT BEAT BY RYAN STILES AT QB !
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:35 am to mcspufftiger7
quote:
USC is good. Possibly very good.
Sure, that's a fair statement.
But what is frustrating, and what LSU can actually control, is the issue of whether LSU is good. LSU was really good at moments in that game, but when the game was on the line, they were not good. That is the key.
It isn't about USC being good, it's about whether LSU is good. It's clear that LSU can be very good. Let's hope they actually get there.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:42 am to mcspufftiger7
quote:
USC is good. Possibly very good
Maybe they are, no one really knows yet.
But what we do know is that with better coaching, LSU would have beaten them.
Tigers didn’t lose because because we didn’t have the talent they lost because of multiple bad coaching decisions starting with the coin toss
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:42 am to TexasTiger89
quote:
I was surprised Nuss didn’t run it at least once or twice but he played great overall
He didn’t play great in crunch time.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:42 am to SulphursFinest
quote:What is bad about them?
No they are not. Good lord
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:44 am to RB10
USC didn’t look that bad. They can be legit in the big ten. That conference is mediocre.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 11:04 am to mcspufftiger7
Yep. USC is good.
And LSU was whipping their arse in the 1st quarter.
Then they lost in the 2nd quarter.
So .... LSU should have won that game but didn't. So, let's examine that.
And LSU was whipping their arse in the 1st quarter.
Then they lost in the 2nd quarter.
So .... LSU should have won that game but didn't. So, let's examine that.
Posted on 9/8/24 at 11:33 am to SulphursFinest
LSU, Mich., Wisconsin, Penn St., Ore, ND.
Yeah kind of weak without Nicholls and South Alabama
Yeah kind of weak without Nicholls and South Alabama
Posted on 9/8/24 at 2:10 pm to NumberONEinBOTHPolls
You can take Michigan and ND off that list
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News