- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Transfer portal and immediate eligibility
Posted on 9/4/20 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 9/4/20 at 7:51 pm
just saw M. Brooks was immediately eligible this year.
I've seen it happen at a few other places this off-season, but this is just asinine and sets a ridiculous precedent.
Why immediately eligible?
I've seen it happen at a few other places this off-season, but this is just asinine and sets a ridiculous precedent.
Why immediately eligible?
Posted on 9/4/20 at 7:57 pm to NastyTiger
Simply put, it's still a fairly new concept that they haven't detailed how to handle yet. Especially given the Covid situation and racial unrest, they're almost always going to lean to the side of the student-athlete.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 8:02 pm to NastyTiger
Sorry but that’s bullshite
Posted on 9/4/20 at 8:20 pm to NastyTiger
Is a coach immediately eligible after signing a contract then jumping ship for another program?
Btw, the transfer portal has limitations.
NCAA.org
Btw, the transfer portal has limitations.
quote:
One of the misconceptions about the portal revolves around a process that has nothing to do with the portal itself: the question of whether a transferring student-athlete will be immediately eligible to compete at a new school.
In Division I sports, student-athletes may transfer once to another four-year NCAA school and are eligible to compete immediately, provided they are academically eligible and the previous school does not object, without sitting out a year in residence.
However, this one-time transfer exception doesn’t apply to baseball, men’s basketball, women’s basketball, football or men’s ice hockey. Student-athletes in these sports must file for a waiver to be able to compete without sitting out a season.
NCAA.org
Posted on 9/4/20 at 9:08 pm to NastyTiger
why shouldn't players be immediately eligible? the idea that they have to sit out is what's more asinine to me.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 9:17 pm to iamandykeim
Because college football needs some stability.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 9:17 pm to iamandykeim
quote:
why shouldn't players be immediately eligible? the idea that they have to sit out is what's more asinine to me.
Baseball used to have this about 15 years ago, Kids could get in a better situation and better their draft status.
I think it was allowed at the time because baseball players didn’t have full scholarships.
I also believe the reasoning to end it was because it made it more difficult to graduate. If someone has more insight they could probably expand.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 9:37 pm to Coater
quote:
Sorry but that’s bullshite
What is?
Posted on 9/4/20 at 9:55 pm to NastyTiger
quote:
M. Brooks
Moved closer to family.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 10:00 pm to TigerCrude
quote:
Moved closer to family
This qualifies you for immediate eligibility?
Posted on 9/4/20 at 10:04 pm to NastyTiger
Not sure if you heard, but there's a global pandemic going on.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 10:45 pm to Coater
If coaching staffs were more trustworthy then I would be less likely to support transfers but the last 25 years or so have shown us countless time a coach sold players a bill of goods and then bolted for more money or whatever.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 10:54 pm to NastyTiger
quote:
Moved closer to family
quote:I gave you a link, you can choose to read.
This qualifies you for immediate eligibility?
NCAA rules have been archaic and arbitrary. How the frick do you lock down a 17-18 year old signing LOI and not give him the same opportunity afforded to the coaches he signed to play for that are making anywhere from $40k to $10 mil per year and can leave, coach anywhere, not sit out a mandatory year.
Earlier it was JUCO or be a Graduate transfer. They picked rules out of a hat. So this is what you know.
Don't put blame where it doesn't belong, regardless if you think you know the reasoning or motivation.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 11:00 pm to DRock88
quote:
Covid situation and racial unrest,
The hoax continues.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 11:10 pm to CDawson
quote:
CDawson
quote:Any thoughts on transfer portal?
The hoax continues.
Or are you just going to troll anywhere you can without an ounce of contribution?
How the frick this account for you hasn't been banned is amazing to me.
Posted on 9/4/20 at 11:16 pm to drizztiger
If it gets O’Neal and Leblanc immediate eligibility I’m for it
Posted on 9/5/20 at 7:30 am to iamandykeim
quote:
why shouldn't players be immediately eligible?
Because it would be the wild wild west
Posted on 9/5/20 at 8:31 am to Elleshoe
quote:
If it gets O’Neal and Leblanc immediate eligibility I’m for it
That’s the thing. There’s no consistency to anything the NCAA does in these matters
Posted on 9/5/20 at 8:38 am to NastyTiger
This actually started before covid so those excuses are out in any discussion regarding this unless they change the rule giving everyone a waiver which hasn't happened.
I personally see both sides of the discussion and am ok with however the NCAA chooses to deal with the situation. Problems are many but 2 stand out.
Waivers- there is no definitive blueprint to get one and that's a problem. Kids like Justin Fields, Tate Martell, the Bru McCoy situation last season of transferring(Texas)after signing(USC)then transferring back to the school he signed with originally(USC), and some others getting waivers essentially opened the gates of free agency. Then the NCAA sets back that progress by denying Luke Ford(the most egregious) or a kid like the Mays kid who went from UGA to Tennessee. They are a crapshoot and that's not ideal. Has to be a set standard for waivers.
The 2nd issue for schools is the tie in to graduation rates which can have an effect on scholarships if numbers go south. Unlimited free agency has to have some kind of clause that takes schools off the hook for those kids and their graduating status if they transfer out.
I personally see both sides of the discussion and am ok with however the NCAA chooses to deal with the situation. Problems are many but 2 stand out.
Waivers- there is no definitive blueprint to get one and that's a problem. Kids like Justin Fields, Tate Martell, the Bru McCoy situation last season of transferring(Texas)after signing(USC)then transferring back to the school he signed with originally(USC), and some others getting waivers essentially opened the gates of free agency. Then the NCAA sets back that progress by denying Luke Ford(the most egregious) or a kid like the Mays kid who went from UGA to Tennessee. They are a crapshoot and that's not ideal. Has to be a set standard for waivers.
The 2nd issue for schools is the tie in to graduation rates which can have an effect on scholarships if numbers go south. Unlimited free agency has to have some kind of clause that takes schools off the hook for those kids and their graduating status if they transfer out.
Posted on 9/5/20 at 9:49 am to drizztiger
quote:
Is a coach immediately eligible after signing a contract then jumping ship for another program
I don’t really care either way, but this is a stupid argument.
Coaches have to abide by their contract and pay whatever buyout is required.
This is comparing apples and potatoes.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News