- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/30/24 at 5:52 pm to FulshearTexasTiger
#Believealllsuplayers
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:01 pm to Dadren
quote:
quote:
Obviously want to see justice done, but also need depth at cb..
Gotta tell ya, it’s not all that obvious to me.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:05 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
We need to make an all time LSU football suspended/cut from team list.
Trey Lealaimatafao might steal your bike
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:20 pm to WDAIII
quote:
He recorded the same girl before, she knew he did it, and she stil had sex with him again. Also, he said he was just protecting himself. With the #metoo money grab, I can understand why somebody would want a tape as insurance. So the issues are 1) whether or not she acquiesced to being taped and 2) whether or not he was just protecting himself and not making sex tapes
So here's the thing - every little tidbit of sick bullshite you just vomited out could be true, and it still wouldn't matter.
He shared the video without her consent.
ETA: Even if he didn't share the video, you cannot commit a sexual crime to defend yourself from potential future accusations of a different sexual crime.
This post was edited on 7/30/24 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:33 pm to WDAIII
quote:
He recorded the same girl before, she knew he did it, and she stil had sex with him again.
If this is true (and you should probably cite your sauces if making that claim), it probably doesn’t matter anyway under the law.
quote:
A. Video voyeurism is any of the following:
(1) The use of any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, or an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping a person where that person has not consented to the specific instance of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping and either:
In fact, if he didn’t have permission the first time it might actually make it worse for him.
quote:
Also, he said he was just protecting himself. With the #metoo money grab, I can understand why somebody would want a tape as insurance.
I can understand why someone might consider it, but it’s still illegal. Committing a sex crime to prevent someone from accusing you of a sex crime isn’t very smart.
quote:
So the issues are 1) whether or not she acquiesced to being taped and 2) whether or not he was just protecting himself and not making sex tapes
#1 is a real issue that will likely determine his guilt or innocence. However, as I noted above, her knowledge of (or even consent to) previous filming does not appear to protect him under the law.
#2 is not all that relevant to his status on the team, as I see it. It won’t be a defense in court. If he’s convicted he will have to register as a sex offender and I sincerely doubt he’ll be allowed to remain on the team.
That said, if he can get the charges reduced or dropped, possibly by working it out with the victim or by showing that she consented, I can see a path back to the field. But I wouldn’t expect that to happen before the season starts. I think fans should probably assume he’s not going to play this year unless/until we hear otherwise. Just my opinion though.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:34 pm to wadewilson
quote:
He shared the video without her consent.
Where has that been reported?
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:35 pm to wadewilson
Do we know he shared the video without her consent?
The original report was that she found it on his laptop…
Not challenging your info, asking a question.
The original report was that she found it on his laptop…
Not challenging your info, asking a question.
This post was edited on 7/30/24 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:45 pm to Iam_PrinceAkeem
Hey Prince only Georgia does that.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:48 pm to Kicks30
I read it here.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 6:54 pm to wadewilson
I’m pretty sure that was a situation where one person speculated that he probably showed it to someone else, someone else agreed, then others started running with it as fact.
I have not seen any legitimate source report that. I don’t believe I’ve even seen anyone who claims to be “in the know” report it.
It may turn out to be true but I wouldn’t throw it out there as a fact based on posts from TD randos (much like the other guy shouldn’t throw the shite about her already knowing he videoed her previously, the thing about “protecting himself,” etc. as facts). IMHO, anyhow.
I have not seen any legitimate source report that. I don’t believe I’ve even seen anyone who claims to be “in the know” report it.
It may turn out to be true but I wouldn’t throw it out there as a fact based on posts from TD randos (much like the other guy shouldn’t throw the shite about her already knowing he videoed her previously, the thing about “protecting himself,” etc. as facts). IMHO, anyhow.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 7:09 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Where has that been reported?
This is the rant. Say something the rantards want to believe and it will be passed around as absolute fact. Say something they don't want to believe, and you will be heavily criticized. That's just the way things work in the minds of simple people.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 7:30 pm to lostinbr
Fair enough.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 7:44 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
We need to make an all time LSU football suspended/cut from team list.
Tyler taylor- robbery
Posted on 7/30/24 at 7:53 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Lol you can’t secretly record everyone you have sex with just because you think they could possibly accuse you of rape.
You can have a security camera anywhere you want inside your house
Posted on 7/30/24 at 8:03 pm to WDAIII
Idiot post and logic
Posted on 7/30/24 at 8:10 pm to lostinbr
She said he did it before and she told him to stop and not do it again. So this dumbass HID IT IN A frickING CLOCK THE VERY DEFINITION OF CONCEALING. Then he showed people. Depending on the part of her body that was shown could mean a VERY VERY serious charge see number 3.
.(1) Except as provided in Paragraphs (3) and (4) of this Subsection, whoever commits the crime of video voyeurism shall, upon a first conviction thereof, be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than two years, or both.
(2) On a second or subsequent conviction, the offender shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than six months nor more than three years without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
(3) Whoever commits the crime of video voyeurism when the observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping is of any vaginal or anal sexual intercourse, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, masturbation, any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola or of any portion of the pubic hair, anus, cleft of the buttocks, vulva, or genitals shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than one year or more than five years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
.(1) Except as provided in Paragraphs (3) and (4) of this Subsection, whoever commits the crime of video voyeurism shall, upon a first conviction thereof, be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than two years, or both.
(2) On a second or subsequent conviction, the offender shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than six months nor more than three years without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
(3) Whoever commits the crime of video voyeurism when the observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping is of any vaginal or anal sexual intercourse, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, masturbation, any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola or of any portion of the pubic hair, anus, cleft of the buttocks, vulva, or genitals shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than one year or more than five years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
Posted on 7/30/24 at 8:28 pm to WDAIII
quote:
"The woman told detectives that Toviano had recorded them having sex in the past without her consent and she told him she did not want to be recorded."
If that’s the case, you’re arguing that he committed a felony twice. That’s not much of a defense…
ETA:
quote:
You can have a security camera anywhere you want inside your house
You have to be trolling.
This post was edited on 7/30/24 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 7/30/24 at 8:30 pm to WDAIII
quote:
You can have a security camera anywhere you want inside your house
he had a hidden camera in a clock strategically pointed at the bed
c’mon man
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News