- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time to kill a myth that was once again created on the Rant
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:45 am to MOT
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:45 am to MOT
quote:
That’s fine, but you don’t get to bitch about not inheriting players and complaining about lack of upperclassmen when players that fit, or would have fit, those descriptions were “processed” or left on his watch.
I've made this point plenty of times.
A - "WE have no depth!!!"
B - "But you just cut some guys? Why did you cut them?"
A - "Oh they weren't going to play anyway."
Makes no sense.
1
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:50 am to MOT
quote:
That’s actually a question for you. You thought it was noteworthy enough to say no players were inherited so I felt compelled to correct your error. Why did you think it’s relevant enough to mention
The players not being on the team is relevant. Why they aren't there doesn't matter.
They were processed and it has been mentioned before. Again they aren't there and thank you for correcting my glaring error. It's just another illustration of why civil discourse can't be had on this board. I hope that you enjoyed your little gotcha.
The fact is that they aren't on the team.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:55 am to MOT
quote:
That’s fine, but you don’t get to bitch about not inheriting players and complaining about lack of upperclassmen when players that fit, or would have fit, those descriptions were “processed” or left on his watch.
That’s why it’s difficult to have a conversation with some of you, and why some of the spin from the athletic department is nauseating
I wasn't bitching about not inheriting players. The other guy said that they inherited talent. Well it must've not been that great of talent because they were let go. So don't tell me what I get to bitch about. If the guy hadn't posted a bunch of bullshite I wouldn't have had to mention it to begin with. Maybe you check yourself before you mouth off about honest conversation.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:57 am to bencoleman
quote:
Do you think that this is relevant or is the fact that they are no longer on the team more relevant?
Oh Jesus. Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:57 am to Goldrush25
quote:
Makes no sense
No what makes no sense is your stubborn refusal to acknowledge the fricking truth.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:59 am to bencoleman
quote:
Maybe you check yourself before you mouth off about honest conversation.
My comments were completely honest and can be verified as factual. I’m sorry that upsets you.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:13 am to bencoleman
quote:
No what makes no sense is your stubborn refusal to acknowledge the fricking truth.
You need a break.... SERIOUS..............
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:13 am to MOT
quote:
My comments were completely honest and can be verified as factual. I’m sorry that upsets you
Again where are these players?
How are they relevant when discussing current members of the team?
You could've simply pointed out that they were processed players. Do you think that I didn't know about them?
Do you think that I intentionally omitted them because it was some sort of conspiracy or sinister plot?
Or could the more simple explanation be that it doesn't matter why they're not here the fact is they aren't here.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:18 am to bencoleman
quote:
Do you think that I didn't know about them?
Do you think that I intentionally omitted them because it was some sort of conspiracy or sinister plot?
This was your exact comment:
quote:
He didn't inherit anything at all on the offensive line he doesn't have any upperclassmen
Yes, I have some thoughts on why you worded it the way you did.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:20 am to bencoleman
quote:
bencoleman
You are getting it handed to you in this thread.... Might want to step back and take a different look at things..........
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:20 am to bencoleman
The statement about Canada being Alleva's man I agree with. This is how I think it went down, O told Alleva he could bring in Kiffin and when that fell through he made O hire the "hot commodity" in Canada.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:23 am to dukke v
quote:
You need a break.... SERIOUS
You can't have a normal conversation on this board. It's troll central. Between the trolls and the delusional civil discourse is impossible.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:25 am to bencoleman
quote:
You can't have a normal conversation on this board
Yes you can... But not with you..... You go overboard with thinking you are right with your agenda and when someone disagrees you attack.... That's NOT a normal conversation........
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:25 am to des4271
quote:
The statement about Canada being Alleva's man I agree with. This is how I think it went down, O told Alleva he could bring in Kiffin and when that fell through he made O hire the "hot commodity" in Canada.
This definitely happened.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:26 am to dukke v
quote:
You are getting it handed to you in this thread.... Might want to step back and take a different look at things
Exactly how am I wrong?
Because I didn't mention some processed players that aren't relevant and aren't here.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:26 am to bencoleman
quote:
Do you think that I intentionally omitted them because it was some sort of conspiracy or sinister plot?
No, but why did you intentionally omit them? I have my suspicions, but I would like to hear your reasoning.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:30 am to dukke v
quote:
Yes you can... But not with you..... You go overboard with thinking you are right with your agenda and when someone disagrees you attack.... That's NOT a normal conversation
Ok. You're right. I can't have a normal conversation on this board.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:34 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
No, but why did you intentionally omit them? I have my suspicions, but I would like to hear your reasoning
I didn't do it intentionally. They've been discussed before. You can choose to believe that or not. I know which one you'll choose. My point then and now is they aren't on the team. I've acknowledged repeatedly that they were processed in the last several posts so why is it still a subject?
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:36 am to des4271
quote:
The statement about Canada being Alleva's man I agree with. This is how I think it went down, O told Alleva he could bring in Kiffin and when that fell through he made O hire the "hot commodity" in Canada
I believe this.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:37 am to mhc4tigers
O-line is right up there with those 2 in my opinion ( d-line and qb).
Page 20 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News