re: Tim Brando says Mizzou is a better job than LSU

quote:

---

slowing backs out of thread to not be hit with errant haymakers

---

see what I mean Rick...this is the only retort he has....and the sad thing is....he thinks its clever.

quote:

---

.this is the only retort he has.

---

...and comprehensive statistics.

You trolled me today, Sidewalk, not the other way around.

would tend to agree

quote:

---

LSU has struggled to build a first-class basketball program due to a history of careless coaching hires.

---

Brady was hired essentially because no one else would take the job under the sanctions from the Brown days.

Johnson seemed like a good "outside the box" candidate. Unfortunately he just wasn't a "fit" recruiting down here

Jones should have never been hired in the first place. Everybody knew from day one how that story would end.

NOW is a great opportunity for LSU though. There is no NCAA sanctions, APR issues or former coach influences to blame things on. With the SECN in place, there has never been more money coming into the program. Except for maybe Indiana if they fire Crean, there are no real bluebloods LSU is competing with in this coaching cycle (NC St., Mizzou, Illinois thus far). All have solid histories, buy I could make a case that LSU is at minimum an equal caliber program.

Go out and be bold. Don't just settle for the likes of Kermit Davis, Rick Stansbury, etc.

Probably for basketball, they are more of a basketball school than a football one.
\

quote:

---

Seems like there is a weekly "Tim Brando says..." thread on here.

We get it Tim; you still want to feel important.

---

He literally gets paid to talk about sports.