- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The last TD to Nabors wouldve been overturned...
Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:24 am to Sull
Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:24 am to Sull
Now we’re acting like victims even in hypothetical fantasy scenarios! LSU fans are really paving the way when it comes to break throughs in the field of victim’s mentality. 

Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:25 am to Fred439
Nah, it wasn't close. It appeared close in full-speed but in slo-mo it clearly showed by the time had had control, he was out of bounds. I'll take it but in reality, it was a bad call. I think they gave it to LSU because the game was out of hand and JD5 was compiling stats. 

Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:47 am to themunch
quote:
Last year at Bama, Coach went all in for the win due to the refs calls.
That is a ridiculous take. Refs could influence an all or nothing play just as they could another OT. BTW, why in the world didn’t the refs call holding on BTJ going against Ricks? They could have. It was a judgement call. If they were in the bag for Bama they would have.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:54 am to Toadfrggy82
Ground can’t cause a fumble. It would’ve been marked down inside the one.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:54 am to shinerfan
If it had been overturned then he would have been down. The ball didnt come loose until after his elbows hit the ground.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 11:58 am to teeMike
I agree with you, but so have to wonder why is it both hands have to touch the ball instead of say a hand and a stomach? Or a hip? I mean the ball was squooshed to Nabers the whole time and for a very very brief instant it was in his hands when he came down in the end zone. The ball never not one time touched the ground. Therefore they did not overturn the TD. But had it been for the win against almighty Alabama, it would have been incomplete.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:03 pm to shinerfan
1st and goal. His elbow down ended the play. Fortunately, the ball was touching the line, but if it would have been short, LSU would have had 1st down on the 1 foot line.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:05 pm to Toadfrggy82
quote:
I believe it would have been a safety
He was down before he ever fumbled so no it wouldn’t have been
Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:07 pm to Cannon856
Look at my baw Cannon. Dude you could be the rules official on Fox dawg




Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:13 pm to Sull
Yeah. I'm pretty sure the words were, "Frick it; let it stand."
Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:14 pm to shinerfan
In the scenario you are suggesting here the call would be a touchback, not a safety.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 12:38 pm to tigerchad71
quote:This. Georgia State ball at the 25.
In the scenario you are suggesting here the call would be a touchback, not a safety.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 1:04 pm to Sull
It should have been overturned once they sent it for review. They just shouldn’t have sent it out for review in the first place. Getting the call right in a 49-14 game wasn’t necessary.
Popular
Back to top
