- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The backjudge is the culprit
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:48 pm to la_birdman
Posted on 10/10/11 at 8:48 pm to la_birdman
Is that Joe from swamp people
Posted on 10/10/11 at 9:21 pm to ByteMe
quote:
What the frick are you talking about?
You seem upset.
Go read the post I quoted, obviously.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:11 pm to moneyg
When you and ForeLSU are on the same side of a debate, I re-think my position, if it differs.
When all three of us are in agreement, we are obviously wasting our time responding to the other side.
How do you think this guy missed my point? Surely a lot of people in an argumentative mood today. His response to you looks about as appropriate as his response to me.
When all three of us are in agreement, we are obviously wasting our time responding to the other side.
How do you think this guy missed my point? Surely a lot of people in an argumentative mood today. His response to you looks about as appropriate as his response to me.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 11:52 pm to moneyg
quote:
quote:The poster Arrakis, aka 62zip You gotta love 50 year old posters who need to make alters to make a point. I wonder how many alters he has in this thread.
Sorry to disappoint you two tools, but I am neither arrakis, nor 50.
And wahoocs, you're right it wasn't a horse collar tackle, but that has nothing to do with whether or not he got inside the pads or just inside the shirt.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 6:58 am to la_birdman
quote:
Can't the ref, I mean the actual one, the one with the white hat, over ride other refs or line judges? This guy reminds me of someone else I know. Just on a power trip.
unless there is ZERO justification, they will cover each others back...CYA all the way.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 7:43 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
That would be Steven Patrick
His boss is Steve Shaw, the coordinator of SEC officials. Steve Shaw is an Alabama graduate. Now with the SEC office in Birmingham and a Boss a bama gradute how else could any of the officials kiss their boss' arse than by making him happy by suspect calls on the field in favor of you know who?
Chances are that all the officials are trying to be fair but just the prospects of what could be, why have anyone who graduated from any SEC school have that job?
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:14 am to catnip
We need an elephant suit and some baseball bats for the next time Mr. Patrick visits Red Stick.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:31 am to ByteMe
quote:
It was a new rule and it was called. Shut the frick up about it!
bam
The truly sad part of all this is that all the moron LSU fans complaining about the call would be screaming the same way at this same guy for failing to call it against an opponent. I love being a homer, but a biased homer is a sad, sad thing.
This post was edited on 10/11/11 at 9:34 am
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:53 am to ByteMe
quote:
I own you now, bitch. Plead your case with Chicken about being reinstated.
Did you just ban a guy for arguing a point like everyone else in this thread (board) simply because he disagreed with you?
Posted on 10/11/11 at 10:31 am to AlxTgr
quote:
I love being a homer, but a biased homer is a sad, sad thing.
You must say backcatcher, no doubt.
Look, if this call results in a marked decrease in any on field celebrations, and players get the message attempting to be sent, AND crews of officials stay consistent with the call, I'm all for it.
But, let's take a look at how consistent this crew was on this play. If we use the '09 LSU/Georgia celebration calls as an example, would this not be a prime example of those calls, and should not they have been called in this instance, in addition to the taunt call?
This whole thing is a Pandora's Box. You're widening the gap of consistency amongst members of the same crew, much less different crews. Every crew is going to have the "I'm going down with the ship, kamikaze" official like 62zip, and a more seasoned common sense official not seeking attention that didn't gain respect from the coach he wanted it from.
Let's just see how this plays out. Obviously, the calls in '09 didn't have the intended effect.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 10:53 am to wahoocs
quote:
This whole thing is a Pandora's Box. You're widening the gap of consistency amongst members of the same crew, much less different crews. Every crew is going to have the "I'm going down with the ship, kamikaze" official like 62zip, and a more seasoned common sense official not seeking attention that didn't gain respect from the coach he wanted it from.
I was unaware you had been to so many of my games. Next time, introduce yourself - I look forward to meeting you.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 11:01 am to 62zip
quote:
I look forward to meeting you.
Well, from your first response to me in this thread, you should know, I'll be the one staking you out.
You might be one of the good guys, but I doubt it.
I actually think you can see the sense in this, but are too prideful to admit it.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 11:25 am to wahoocs
Hey, my offer stands, you're welcome anytime. Just let me know and drop on by. It would be great to meet you.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 11:29 am to wahoocs
quote:Do not get.
You must say backcatcher, no doubt
Posted on 10/11/11 at 11:32 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
Did you just ban a guy for arguing a point like everyone else in this thread (board) simply because he disagreed with you?
Looks like he did and from what I hear it is not the first time. What a shame and a detriment to what makes this board good.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 11:49 am to 62zip
quote:
Sorry to disappoint you two tools, but I am neither arrakis, nor 50.
Hey Zip...that guy is as big of a dumbfrick as wahoocs. ROFL
Hope you are having a great year. I haven't had time to log on; especially on Sat, but when I need a good laugh this is the place.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 12:01 pm to CougarBait
quote:
Looks like he did and from what I hear it is not the first time. What a shame and a detriment to what makes this board good.
Agreed. If true, that has small dick syndrome written all over it.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 12:05 pm to CougarBait
quote:
Did you just ban a guy for arguing a point like everyone else in this thread (board) simply because he disagreed with you?
Looks like he did and from what I hear it is not the first time. What a shame and a detriment to what makes this board good.
To be fair, "You don't own me. I do what I want. Get the frick out if you don't like it." is not a good thing to say to a known admin in general.....
Posted on 10/11/11 at 12:06 pm to 62zip
quote:
62zip
The Locker call just doesn't seem to be in dispute at all. That is actually one of my favorite plays of all time.
So is it the defense's choice of when to assess the penalty? Seems like they so rarely take it on the PAT.
Popular
Back to top


0







