- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The 90% vs The 10%
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:43 am to Kikicaca
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:43 am to Kikicaca
quote:
When one starts using a posters grammar as a way to win a point you know he has lost the argument.
Nah. Sometimes, a poster's grammar can be indicative of their lack of intelligence or reasoning, among other things, which could reflect on the veracity or substance of their argument.
It's probably a good call when it comes to your "argument" in this thread.
0
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:44 am to delta saint
Yeah but you and I both know he wasn't going that route with it. 
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:46 am to Kikicaca
quote:oh wow
I played at the former USL under Russ Falkenberry. Was a walk-on WR. Robbie Juul was my QB but since we ran a version of the veer/wishbone we didn't throw much.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:49 am to Kikicaca
90% of football is half mental
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:49 am to Kikicaca
quote:
1. I saw a defense that is as good as Bama's
I see you're on drugs
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:50 am to Kikicaca
quote:
LSU is in the SEC West I know you know what that means. I don't do static predictions because what if Max or Nuss or both get hurt? With that said I will say other than Bama if and only if we stay healthy at QB and OL we will have a chance to win between 9 and 10 games. With a few breaks and a little luck (and don't try to tell me that doesn't factor in) we could win 11 games.
No offense, but you don't know football. You don't know what you are seeing. You get lost in a few details you recognize and can't gauge the impact of those details.
It would be a HUGE accomplishment for this team to win 8 games. For this team to win 10-11 games would require the defense to flip a switch and play in a manner we haven't seen yet...AND, major offensive liabilities to completely turn around to become strengths (namely OL play). Then, you'd have to either get Johnson to make start playing significantly bettter or hope someone else can come in and be well above average.
Unfortunately, that ain't happening. It's probably 100x more likely that this team win 5 games than it does 11.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:52 am to Kikicaca
I work with a guy who was a 3 year starter for the Cajuns in the 80's at LB, and he would say you're full of shite.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:53 am to Aconant10
quote:
90% of football is half mental
and the other 50% is luck
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:53 am to Kikicaca
quote:
Kikicaca
quote:
You are the perfect person to give an honest answer to this question:
When UCLA blitzed the shite out of us, why did we not run a draw or screen to counter the blitz?
Seriously, help me out here. When UCLA blitzed the shite out of us practically the entire game, why did we not run a draw or screen to counter the blitz?
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:53 am to Rtowntiger
quote:
Serious question. Is Kikicaca now the biggest douche bag on the board? Lord have mercy, there is no way you have any friends. Who talks like that? Your confidence in your football knowledge is very misguided, for your takes are objectively horrible. Might be the reason you were a walk-on. This 90%'r doesn't think you have any idea what you are talking about.
So where and when did you walk-on? Not looking for friends here especially friends who turn on their football team at the blink of an eye. And yes I talk like that cause there is no other way to talk to quitters. You think I give a shite that I am not part of the mighty 90% the majority? Being in the majority just because it's "the majority" is for blind followers. Biden got elected by a supposed "majority" look where that has got us.
As far as my misguided football knowledge compared to you if I took one step on a college football field at practice or at a game that makes me 100 times more knowledgeable than you I bet.
Yes I talk like that to expose a bunch of know nothing whinny so called fans who act like spoiled brats cause we lost one game.
Would rather be a douchebag than a follower of your stinking majority.
BTW I was in the minority in 2016 about the hiring of O. That only got us a steadily upward winning record and a once in a lifetime great football team that won a NC. I saw here what the mighty majority thought of O and Ensminger back then. Y'all were wrong then, wrong now and will be wrong in the future.
This post was edited on 9/16/21 at 9:59 am
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:54 am to Kikicaca
Well, rather than blathering on about much you know and other don't, how about breaking down what you saw in some detail.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:54 am to Kikicaca
When UCLA blitzed the shite out of us, why did we not run a draw or screen to counter the blitz?
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:55 am to Kikicaca
quote:
All right let's rock! I played at the former USL under Russ Falkenberry.
Oh wow. You've been out of the sport for nearly 50 years now.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:55 am to Rtowntiger
quote:
Serious question. Is Kikicaca now the biggest douche bag on the board? Lord have mercy, there is no way you have any friends. Who talks like that? Your confidence in your football knowledge is very misguided, for your takes are objectively horrible. Might be the reason you were a walk-on. This 90%'r doesn't think you have any idea what you are talking about
It is VERY clear from his posts and the time frame he’s been on the board that he is a Ree/Ponamsky alter.
He knows nothing and should be ignored.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:57 am to atltiger6487
quote:
the OP's argument is like saying I can't comment on whether a movie is good or bad because I'm not a director.
Eh, more like I am not the coffee boy for the director, tbh.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:59 am to memphis tiger
quote:
It is VERY clear from his posts and the time frame he’s been on the board that he is a Ree/Ponamsky alter.
He knows nothing and should be ignored.
That's cool with me. Ree, Ponamsky, Kikicaca ...just answer this question:
When UCLA blitzed our arse throughout the game, why did we not run a draw or screen to counter the blitz?
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:01 am to Kikicaca
quote:
All right let's rock! I played at the former USL
I turned down scholarship offers from USL and LaTech to walk on at LSU, I had had enough of high school by then
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:07 am to SammyTiger
quote:
We ran a greater variety of running plays against McNeese than we did UCLA.
We did against UCLA because we had to we had to try everything we were losing. Against McNeese we didn't have to and shouldn't have.
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:10 am to TigerBR1111
quote:
It was Jim Mora that said that not Bum Phillips dumb arse.
You think you know but you don’t.
It was Bum Phillips dumb arse maybe Mora did it too but Bum did it first.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News