Started By
Message

re: Texas Tech downs Puke

Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:25 pm to
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:25 pm to
Shot selection and how open you are determines your shot %. We were awful on defense which led to wide open looks. They shot 46% from the field and 48% from 3. They didn’t break any records.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4296 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Like I said you believe numbers just magically appear and that’s fine you’re just wrong.


I’m sure that sounded good inside your head, but it’s just gibberish. You’ve already said you don’t think LSU is worse than teams who scored more points against Texas Tech, so you agree the actual numbers put up in that game aren’t truly reflective of team strength. You’ve already said you aren’t opposing the idea that the game isn’t proof that LSU isn’t a tournament caliber team, so I just don’t know what numbers you are talking about or what opinion I have expressed that you think is wrong. At this point, you’re arguing just to argue, which is funny given that’s what you accused me of doing.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 2:20 pm
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
13545 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Texas Tech downs Puke


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

Get it? It’s like DUKE, but with a ‘P’ so it says ‘PUKE’







Good one bro
Posted by GreenieTiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
418 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 3:25 pm to
It appears it's time to have your meds adjusted.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34156 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

LSU is in a tough situation when it comes to MBB scheduling. They aren't good enough on paper for the elite Power 4 types to schedule in non-conference play. Duke losing to LSU in a home & home is a lot worse than Michigan St. They also don't have the fanbase to draw massive ticket sales to the marquee events in MSG, Maui, etc. Yes...I'm aware they've been before but more often are playing in Destin, Charleston, Greenbrier, etc. over thanksgiving.



This is fair to some degree. The last 3 years of suck have really hurt the LSU brand and marquee made for tv games/events aren't looking for LSU. But that also means you have to do a couple of things:

1. Be willing to go play a stand alone road game at a big time opponent. Oklahoma went to Gonzaga. Ole Miss went to St. John's.

2. But more detail into scheduling the rent-a-win opponents. Try to find some solid mid-majors and, for Godssake, limit the SWAC/MEAC opponents to 1 per year.

Regardless, LSU (assuming they win the next two) has done enough to put themselves in a spot where they enter SEC play with a reasonable margin for error relative to a tournament resume. To my recollection, this is the highest they've ranked in the KenPom ratings entering SEC play under McMahon.

The blowout loss to TTU was disheartening and showed LSU and McMahon is probably not capable of competing with upper echelon power conf. teams. If that is McMahon's ceiling, the that is something that should be discussed at the end of the season. However, the did bounce bag with a strong win over an SMU team that is likely comparable to the middle of the SEC pack this year.
Posted by CapitalTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2019
291 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

1. Be willing to go play a stand alone road game at a big time opponent. Oklahoma went to Gonzaga. Ole Miss went to St. John's.



Correct. I think if we finish in the top half of the SEC these opportunities will open up. The flip side is those Top-20 schools want the marquee name, but also the guarantee that they'll be decent.

quote:

2. But more detail into scheduling the rent-a-win opponents. Try to find some solid mid-majors and, for Godssake, limit the SWAC/MEAC opponents to 1 per year.


Yep. It's a balance. Get Colorado St., Santa Clara, Utah Valley, George Washington, Belmont, etc. to the PMAC. Will have to pay them more than Prairie View but you'll also get better preparation for SEC play.

Honestly, this year's schedule hasn't been horrendous if they chose to play SMU at home and replaced Alcorn/PVAM with a school like Belmont. Hell, if a school like Belmont is unwilling to come here for 1 game...do a 2 for 1 with them. Or even better, work with a promoter for the Nashville game to be at Bridgestone in a doubleheader with Tennessee in game 2 vs. Purdue.
Posted by JWill409
Beaumont, TX
Member since Sep 2010
1435 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

They shot 46.7%, why are you people acting like they broke some record for FG% against us?


God, here we go.

48% from 3 is their highest so far this year. Especially for a team that averages 28 attempts per game. Also worth noting, they rank 48th in 3pt%....lots of outliers here.

For context, they shot 32% from 3 in the win vs Duke.

Point is, more than likely they don't shoot 48% again, and we don't shoot 17%.

Not really that difficult to grasp.
Posted by TigerMonkey7
Member since Jul 2021
4200 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:07 pm to
I would bet $1,000 they wouldn’t shoot 48% from 3 and we wouldn’t shoot 17% from 3 if the two teams rematched, in that regard, it would be a significantly closer game
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm to
And they shot almost 10% better overall but that falls outside of your excuse so you just ignore it. More importantly they made only 2 more 3s than their average vs us but yea those 6 points were the difference in the game.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 5:29 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:25 pm to
We’ve shot better than that, over 50% from 3 and lost under McMahon. This is just another excuse you guys cling to but don’t even understand.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 5:26 pm
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
13545 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

It appears it's time to have your meds adjusted.


You used a preteen insult towards a university basketball team thinking you were clever

I’m not the one that needs evaluation
Posted by CapitalTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2019
291 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

More importantly they made only 2 more 3s than their average but yea those 6 points were the difference in the game lol.


And we made 3 less than our average. Bringing it to a 9 point game.

LSU also averages 19.5 FT's made per game, we made 12.

If the trend continues with LSU and this roster, then I'll be concerned. But for now it seems like this was an outlier of a game where TTU came out hot and LSU had to play catchup.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:38 pm to
lol
Posted by ultratiger89
Houston, Tx
Member since Aug 2007
3661 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:59 pm to
I can’t keep up with sponsorship acronyms
Posted by GreenieTiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
418 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:07 pm to
I should have written it out. My bad. It was the game held December 13 in New Orleans vs SMU.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45057 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

I should have written it out. My bad. It was the game held December 13 in New Orleans vs SMU.
You should have just said tBlender. He would have gotten it.
Posted by JWill409
Beaumont, TX
Member since Sep 2010
1435 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

And they shot almost 10% better overall but that falls outside of your excuse so you just ignore it. More importantly they made only 2 more 3s than their average vs us but yea those 6 points were the difference in the game.


What? It’s not an excuse man. They didn’t execute. Missed a bunch of wide open 3s. I see that instead of using % you’re using made 3s per game to fit your argument.

They average 33.5% on the year and that INCLUDES this game so if we’re just using that number, out of 24 attempts is 8, which would be 16 points. That alone makes the game 10 points. Not to mention, our best rebounder getting into foul trouble early and only recording 21 minutes AND one of your best players/shooter tallying an 0-9 game. All outliers compared to what they’ve done on the year. Not saying we would’ve won, but it just brings perspective to someone like yourself who ignores any “facts” about the way we’ve played all season.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66644 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:30 pm to
37.2% which would’ve been a 2/3 shot difference and wouldn’t have made a difference. Nwoko has been in foul trouble in 9 of 11 games so using that as an excuse is also false. Bottom line, and we’re seeing it again tonight, is we’re not any good on D, our frontline players are sub par and we don’t do much on offense. That was exposed by a good team so we were blown out.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:32 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram