Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Beaumont, TX
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1442
Registered on:9/7/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Predict the MBB SEC Record

Posted by JWill409 on 12/25/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

More make believe. Jim said we’d have 6 SEC wins in January, I offered to bet him on that and he ran away until you clowns created this phony narrative. So obviously my prediction is we’ll win fewer than 6 SEC games in January since you’re too dishonest or too stupid to realize what I said. Another funny caveat into your type is 2 years ago when I missed my SEC prediction by one game due to us losing to multiple shitty teams. That year you said my predictions were too high and all I was doing was setting them high so that when we didn’t meet that number I could attack McMahon for it. You people are completely dishonest and are not LSU basketball fans period.



Wtf is all this? The question was the SEC record for the whole season no one asked about you and Jim’s bet in January. You keep beating around the bush doing what you always do hurling around more bs to dodge what was asked.

I said your predictions were too high? Since you have brought up many posts in the past please show me where I said that.


We simply asked what you think the record is going to be because you continually berate people for lack of basketball knowledge so usually people who claim to know alot about basketball will be confident enough to make a prediction based off of said knowledge. Still waiting lol

re: Predict the MBB SEC Record

Posted by JWill409 on 12/23/25 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

No you’re just doing what you always do, create a false narrative to hide the facts.


That’s all you, I’ll go back on what I said when you actually post what you think the record will be. It’s like you have preprogrammed responses on WordPad and you just copy and paste them onto here lol

re: Predict the MBB SEC Record

Posted by JWill409 on 12/23/25 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Lmfao accuse your opponent of what you’re doing. Feminine cuck 101


What’s feminine is living on the fence, scared to lose.

Everyone is awaiting your prediction.

re: Predict the MBB SEC Record

Posted by JWill409 on 12/23/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

I didn’t see your prediction for SEC?


He won't put himself in a position to be wrong.


10-8 is what I say.

re: Predict the MBB SEC Record

Posted by JWill409 on 12/23/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

MK is MK. He's a bit to take, but he knows his ball, and he's always around.


If arguing, insulting intelligence, and talking about people's mom is "knowing ball", than he definitely takes the cake. I don't think I've actually seen him talk about basketball stuff.
quote:

This team will be nowhere near the 9 line when all is said and done. We’ve played one good game this season (the monumental, program-defining SMU win). The blowouts against cupcakes are not a good litmus test for a team.

Last night should’ve been alarming to any LSU basketball fan.



Blowouts against cupcakes are not a good litmus test, but beating a cupcake team by only 16 when they shot 57% from 3 is? I guess Alabama should be alarmed too with their 11pt wins vs USF and Kennesaw State?

Make it make sense.

So only you can determine what a good win is, when every major metric out there(that you've used against us for years) has us as a top 40 team and making the tournament? So you'll only value the metric when it fits your argument? Interesting.
PV shot 57% from 3, our philosophy on defense is to make people beat us from 3, so there will definitely be some SEC games we get blown out, but I believe we will win more games than we lose in conference. PV came in 198th in 3 point fg%. The key will be staying out of foul trouble. This is a much more winnable approach contrary to last year where we were god awful in protecting the paint. I'm not a huge fan of switching everything and going under screens, but it keeps opponents from living at the rim like they did last year.

re: Texas Tech downs Puke

Posted by JWill409 on 12/22/25 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

And they shot almost 10% better overall but that falls outside of your excuse so you just ignore it. More importantly they made only 2 more 3s than their average vs us but yea those 6 points were the difference in the game.


What? It’s not an excuse man. They didn’t execute. Missed a bunch of wide open 3s. I see that instead of using % you’re using made 3s per game to fit your argument.

They average 33.5% on the year and that INCLUDES this game so if we’re just using that number, out of 24 attempts is 8, which would be 16 points. That alone makes the game 10 points. Not to mention, our best rebounder getting into foul trouble early and only recording 21 minutes AND one of your best players/shooter tallying an 0-9 game. All outliers compared to what they’ve done on the year. Not saying we would’ve won, but it just brings perspective to someone like yourself who ignores any “facts” about the way we’ve played all season.

re: Texas Tech downs Puke

Posted by JWill409 on 12/22/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

They shot 46.7%, why are you people acting like they broke some record for FG% against us?


God, here we go.

48% from 3 is their highest so far this year. Especially for a team that averages 28 attempts per game. Also worth noting, they rank 48th in 3pt%....lots of outliers here.

For context, they shot 32% from 3 in the win vs Duke.

Point is, more than likely they don't shoot 48% again, and we don't shoot 17%.

Not really that difficult to grasp.

re: SMU is a good win

Posted by JWill409 on 12/15/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

You are not actually required to freak out and try to defend McMahon at every waking moment of the basketball season.


No one is "required" to trash him, or talk about Will Wade still, but here we are.
quote:

WE
DONT HAVE GOOD ENOUGH PLAYERS.


Explain being top 25 in multiple categories?

If you say something about the weak schedule, why haven't we done similar in the previous 3 years with a weak schedule?

Your logic is flawed, we are much better, but basketball can be that way sometimes. If this same exact thing happens with SMU, I may be a little worried.

re: Common sense about Matt McMahon

Posted by JWill409 on 12/10/25 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Common sense


Asking for a lot right there.
quote:

Has nothing to do with the comments but nice deflection attempt


How could I deflect something that I don’t know what you’re referring to based on that comment you made? So you’re saying what I said was accurate?

You people LIVE and DIE on NET and KenPom all year. They got as high as #19(?) Now all of the sudden they’re not good and this is the same old McMahon team. Well, what is it? Are they really that bad, or are the metrics flawed as I’ve been saying for a long time? Can’t have both.
quote:

It’s also not accurate so…..


Really??

They're 4-5 against the spread. Not sure how that's inaccurate.
quote:

Did you watch the games? They had open shots, just missed them.

The offense wasn't sloppy, the 1st half to's were just individual bad mistakes. Overall 9 to's on the game with that happening. TO's have not been a problem this year.

Shots weren't rushed.

Defense had some missed assignments, but wasn't bad. We defended well on Toppin. The only bad i can think of was handling Toppin on the pick and roll. We sagged too much and left the guard open. On his post ups we did a nice job of doubling then recovering.



None of this matters to them, even with wins, they were out in full force. Now their opinions feel validated with one loss. They live and die by KenPom and Net until this happens, then none of it matters.

Will Wade seems to be scraping by with his season so far, even after getting millions in NIL, so they need something.
quote:

#10 for BC needs a team built around him. The guy is good.


The guy who came in averaging 3 points a game, hit a few shots and then had to get bailed out by a timeout and missed a double clutch 3 for the win…and then disappeared in OT?


Now I get it.
quote:

Enough is enough. Verge needs to make a change at the end of the season.


Comical, you people.

re: Here comes McBlowAlead

Posted by JWill409 on 12/3/25 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Your pecker got so hard I bet. Waiting all season to finally have something negative to post. Congrats


FIFY
But all the experts on this board had them bottom of the SEC...
quote:

LSU has played 2 decent teams so far. UCF in exhibition game and UNO. Held both to 58 and 68 points. They did not show up defensively last night and should be criticized for that but a lot of these higher ranked teams have struggled with supposed cupcakes on their roster early. How else do you explain Auburn needing overtime to beat #288 ranked Bethune Cookman.Do they suck? Well they lost to #2 Houston by 1 point. So although I believe LSU needs to be consistent in their defense I also understand that it's basketball and a team can get hot like Alcorn did combined with LSU playing uninspired defense although LSU did pick it up the last 5 minutes of the game when it needed to. We will see what we have soon enough after Thanksgiving. But to troll Mcmahon because Alcorn played with us for 3/4 of the game,but never in control, is a little over the top.


You've completely missed the point. I never once trolled MM. My point was, if other teams "better than us" are barely getting by lower tier opponents and we are blowing them out, why do we continually get shite on by our own fan base, when better teams can't beat those teams as handily as we do? It's basketball, these things happen is my other point.

We have fans freaking out by a 5 point halftime lead. Won the game by 26.

We have fans freaking out about rebounding. Won that battle 43-28.

What gives?

Can't we just enjoy a potential new era of LSU basketball? This is clearly the best team we've had in awhile.
A lot of people on here somehow think that high ranking opponents should dominate every mediocre/bad team. We even go as far as having a meltdown at halftime of games with small leads to inferior opponents. Kentucky, Arkansas, Florida have already struggled with bad opponents. I'm not talking about just for a half either. We're talking barely edging out people by single digits, and here we are thinking LSU should blow out every one of them. Coincidentally, they have. So now what?