- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Talent solves the world's problem on offense
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:32 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:32 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
Talent solves the world's problem on offense
Talent solves the problems period. Some people are just obsessed with coaching.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:38 pm to CalTiger53
quote:
Talent solves the problems period. Some people are just obsessed with coaching.
Somehow other teams have found a way to get a few points in on Bama.
LSU is the worst performing team in the SEC West on offense against Bama since 2011.
You'll never out recruit Bama while Saban is there. Never. He has impeccable track record, second to none when it comes to both college development and getting guys into the NFL.
By your logic that its talent alone, LSU should just give up and stop trying to beat Bama.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:38 pm to CalTiger53
quote:
Talent solves the problems period.
Oh yeah??
So aTm must have waaaayyy more talent than LSU I guess. Considering the are 50 spots hire in total offense and 20 spots hire in ppg than LSU with the same SOS.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:38 pm to CalTiger53
That's because we're never going to be the most talented team as long as Nick Saban is coaching. Of course you try to get the best players you can, but we need to stop this thinking that talent alone will get us over this hump.
Obviously there's a certain type of offensive scheme that Saban's defenses have trouble with. We know this because Bama's actually been defeated, not only scored on, defeated over these past few years.
I don't see what's so difficult about hiring a young OC well versed in implementing those concepts. We have to do things the hard way though.
Obviously there's a certain type of offensive scheme that Saban's defenses have trouble with. We know this because Bama's actually been defeated, not only scored on, defeated over these past few years.
I don't see what's so difficult about hiring a young OC well versed in implementing those concepts. We have to do things the hard way though.
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 11/27/18 at 8:46 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
Getting better o linemen will help out a lot.
We already have good offensive linemen, they are just young. Hines, Lewis, Saahdiq, and Deculus will be a great foursome in another year.
Notice that Bama has a huge talent advantage, but has only a small advantage in NFL rosters. It’s because we get nearly the talent that they do, but ours is concentrated at the skill positions, and they get their talent to stay longer.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 9:48 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
Do you honestly believe that there are 70+ teams in the country with better talent on offense than LSU?
Do you honestly think there are 70+ teams in the country that would have more total offense than LSU if they played our schedule?
I see this thrown around a lot and I think it's disingenuous at best. Follow along with me...
The SEC is the best conference in college football and it's not even close - the SEC is 34-6 vs. FBS teams, winning 85% of its FBS OOC matchups. The next best is the Big 12 at 15-6 (71%) followed by the Big 10 at 25-14 (64%). So of the 130 FBS teams (including the 14 that are in the SEC) how many have to play against our conference opponents?
- At least 1 SEC opponent: 46 teams
- At least 2 SEC opponents: 21 teams
- At least 3 SEC opponents: 15 teams (14 are in the SEC)
How about teams ranked in the current CFP top-25? LSU has played 5 teams in the current CFP rankings. Other FBS schools?
- At least 4 top-25 opponents: 31 teams
- At least 5 top-25 opponents: 13 teams
Of those teams who played at least 5 top-25 opponents, the average rank in total offensive production is 74.
How about the defensive rankings of our opponents? LSU has played 8 teams with top-50 total defenses, including #2 Miami, #3 Mississippi State, #6 Alabama, and #12 Georgia. The rest of FBS?
- At least 6 top-50 defensive opponents: 25 teams
- At least 7 top-50 defensive opponents: 7 teams
- At least 8 top-50 defensive opponents: 1 team (LSU)
Here are some of the strength-of-schedule rankings for LSU:
- teamrankings: #1
- Sagarin: #6
- S&P+: #1
(I should also add that that S&P+ predicts a top-5 team would win approximately 9.5 games against our schedule - I'd say going 9-3 after a seven-OT loss puts us pretty close to that..)
All of this to say - yes, our offense has under-performed. It's partly due to playcalling and partly due to all of the "talent" factors that get thrown around.. injuries, lack of any 5* talent combined with inexperience on offensive line, the fact that at several points throughout the year we started 5 OL who had never started an NCAA game before 2018, the fact that we lost 87% of our total offensive production from skill positions last year....
But regardless of ALL of that, if you think there are 70+ schools in the country that could out-perform LSU's offensive unit against our schedule, you're smoking crack.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:11 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
So aTm must have waaaayyy more talent than LSU I guess. Considering the are 50 spots hire in total offense and 20 spots hire in ppg than LSU with the same SOS.
1. I just looked at it and aTm is 16 spots ahead of LSU in scoring offense, with a *massive* gap of 2.9 points per game. Yet another reason that looking at rankings is retarded. For reference, Bama is scoring 15 more ppg than aTm.
2. Meanwhile, LSU is ranked 34 spots ahead of aTm in scoring defense with a gap of 5.4 ppg. For reference, Bama is allowing 7 fewer ppg than LSU.
3. aTm returned 16 total starters (offense and defense) from last year, fourth-most in the SEC. LSU returned 10 total starters from last year, last in the SEC. This was before Brumfield injury, Ingram's suspension, etc.
4. I think you mean "higher"...
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:14 pm to lostinbr
Obviously talent is important but coaching is equally important. You have to be able to develop talent, recognize each players strengths (and weaknesses) and come up with the best way to employ each players talent in scheme that out-maneuvers the opposing DC’s scheme. I think we’re plenty talented, we’re just not utilizing our talent efficiently.
IMO talent and coaching are 50/50. We see less talented teams beat a more talented teams through coaching and vice versa all the time.
IMO talent and coaching are 50/50. We see less talented teams beat a more talented teams through coaching and vice versa all the time.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:18 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
It’s the opposite actually. You can scheme your way to a productive offense way easier than you can scheme your way to a solid defense. Like way way way easier.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:21 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
Good point!! Very true and astute observation!!
Signed,
2011 LSU #2 Nationally ranked Tigers
Signed,
2011 LSU #2 Nationally ranked Tigers
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:23 pm to bostitch
So you're saying those teams finished higher than LSU?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:30 pm to PawnMaster
Saban can't win NCs without 5 star recruits. We are striving to win NCs and we do not have enough overall talent to do so.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I'll take a more talented defense any day. Bama won more NCs basically because they have more talent on defense vs the talent they play on offense. Yea I'm aware teams scored on Bama but also they got dominated by Bama. Saban has his team more prepared against LSU versus any other team. We get their best every time.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:35 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
Slinger would be undefeated at Bama as well. Pretty much anybody would. It all starts with the OL.
They would be in the 40's in offense.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:37 pm to FightinTiga
quote:
LSU is a 1 loss team with a good Oline this year
The playcalling and oline coaching have led more to the oline sucking than talent.
This oline talent isnt that a lot less talented than most Miles olines and his lines were never this bad.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:38 pm to Rickdaddy4188
The same plays he calls at LSU would work at Alabama. They have More talent they everyone else and would still put up points. They are undefeated with a nobody as OC. They win every year with anyone at OC. The reason is they have more talent.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:38 pm to Codythetiger
quote:
Why did the even make the saying "Hard Work beats Talent when Talent won't work hard"
All we need is talent
It also begs the question.....
Why did we fire Miles?
He is a better recruiter than O and his program name definitely carries more weight with recruits.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:39 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Do you honestly think there are 70+ teams in the country that would have more total offense than LSU if they played our schedule?
There's more than 9, which is the amount of teams ahead of us in the playoff rankings.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:40 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
Honestly, part of what pisses me off most about the shite show from Saturday is that we (mostly) did what we wanted on offense, except that awful 1st and goal in 4OT.
Then came back in 5th ot and threw a hb pass........
I was screaming......." why didnt you run that the last ot for the win........"
Posted on 11/27/18 at 10:40 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
Where the frick is that level of play calling and execution at the end of the 4th qrtr when we could have ended it? Where was that level of play calling against UF? Against Bama?
Burrow played out of his mind saturday.....
Dont forget that.
Popular
Back to top


4




