re: Surprised the star gazers aren’t all in on Daniels

Perhaps I haven't read enough of the posts, but it doesn't appear to me that people are upset with the prospect of Daniels starting.

On the contrary, I think most people are fully in support of whichever quarterback the coaches believe gives the Tigers the best chance to win. Simple as that.

He's also I think 195 now

quote:

---

when the coaches have been there everyday and us computer nerds sitting at home think we know best

---

This.

Almost everything right now is speculation on our part. It' hard to even have a meaningful discussion without enough reliable facts to come to conclusions. I've been a fan of Brennan since his time at the opening. Based on recent reports, I've been more excited about Nuss. If JD ends up the starter, I hope he kills it and leads us back to the SECCG and CFP. I certainly trust BK's opinion on it more than anyone here. Given the new players, new coaches, and new system, I'm not even sure if any of our accepted ideas on them is accurate.

Consider this though. Assuming as many on here do that JD would end up running the ball a lot more than Nuss, and also just for the sake of argument that the difference between them were otherwise a coin flip, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to start JD with Nuss as the backup than the other way around?

Also with Nuss younger, having more years to play and improve, and having given JD his shot even if it didn't work out, it probably makes a lot of sense for Kelly to go with JD to start if they haven't separated themselves yet.

quote:

---

Will get broke up in sec ....isnt that what they said about Myles

---

There’s quite a difference in athleticism in the two.

I think most people are skeptical based on his 2021 season, the spring game, and the strength of the team being WR.

High school ranking for a class of 2019 QB doesn't amount to shite today.