- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spring baseball stats through 6 scrimmages
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:38 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:38 pm to lsufball19
quote:
And you said he couldn’t throw anyone out
You’re the one trying to defend 2/10 as some above average number.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:42 pm to lsufball19
You said he was above average.
I Showed you he was slightly below.l league average (including Vandy who is a statistical outlier) I showed You that 8/14 teams are doing better than him.
You’re the one defending 2/10 as above average. He doesn’t pass the eyeball test, his numbers are meh. And this is his strength as a catcher.
I Showed you he was slightly below.l league average (including Vandy who is a statistical outlier) I showed You that 8/14 teams are doing better than him.
You’re the one defending 2/10 as above average. He doesn’t pass the eyeball test, his numbers are meh. And this is his strength as a catcher.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:43 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
You’re the one trying to defend 2/10 as some above average number.
I retracted awhile ago and said it appears as if he was actually just average. You seem to continue to want to argue your point, that you don't have,. Why? I have no idea. Maybe stop arguing in extremes. Would probably be a good start
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:50 pm to lsufball19
I’m always willing to belabor a point.
And originally injust said Travinski isn’t a good catcher and you chose to argue that point with me with a pretty vague response.
I asked What you meant and pointed out his weaknesses and then you decided to defend his average ability to pick off runners.
I’m always willing to go down a rabbit hole but dont try and high road me from in the rabbit hole.
Like you never explained what you meant by “ But he is perfectly capable at handling a staff and the running game.”
And originally injust said Travinski isn’t a good catcher and you chose to argue that point with me with a pretty vague response.
I asked What you meant and pointed out his weaknesses and then you decided to defend his average ability to pick off runners.
I’m always willing to go down a rabbit hole but dont try and high road me from in the rabbit hole.
Like you never explained what you meant by “ But he is perfectly capable at handling a staff and the running game.”
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I’m always willing to belabor a point.
No shite

quote:
And originally injust said Travinski isn’t a good catcher and you chose to argue that point with me with a pretty vague response.
Vague response? I literally singled out your saying he couldn’t throw anyone out. That’s it. It wasn’t vague. It was actually the opposite of vague. You, predictably, said he was bad at everything (see: arguing in extremes). I pointed out he wasn’t poor at throwing, to which others agreed, and you, again, just couldn’t handle any modicum of disagreement. That’s on you bud
quote:
I asked What you meant
And I told you
quote:
But he is perfectly capable at handling a staff and the running game.”
Maybe because I didn’t say that. You’re responding to two different people here my man
Ell and I are not the same poster. HTH
This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:21 pm to lsufball19
quote:
you, again, just couldn’t handle any modicum of disagreement. That’s on you bud
What do you think you’ve been doing?
Like I said, I don't Mind arguing. Great way to waste some time. But why pretend like you aren’t?
Like you said, this isn’t even you’re argument
Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:23 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Like you said, this isn’t even you’re argument
This is the part where you say “my bad,” not try to crawfish and make a very poor attempt to gaslight

Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:38 pm to lsufball19
I’m not gaslighting you.
You just think that.
You just think that.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 7:03 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
He might get thru March at .240 but the SEC is going to tear him up.

Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:02 pm to ell_13
quote:
quote:He might get thru March at .240 but the SEC is going to tear him up.
And, yet, he’s barely playing. Weird flex on the BA when you missed so far on how much playing time he would get.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:08 pm to MikeTheTiger71
He’s getting plenty of PT. Not as much as many thought but he’s getting in games. 17 appearances with 2 starts. Just fewer ABs.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:22 pm to ell_13
quote:
He’s getting plenty of PT. Not as much as many thought but he’s getting in games
Fair point. He is playing, just not starting much.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:34 pm to ell_13
I’d rather you make a thread about it like Gio last year. Will be easier to find
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:37 pm to ell_13
He’s coming in usually after Neal AB in the 5-6 inning when we don’t think we’ll get another go around the lineup unless things are really out of hand.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 9:40 pm to ell_13
Not sure why you are strutting. You quoted Lester saying he won’t hit .240 in SEC play. We haven’t played a SEC game yet.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:56 am to Lester Earl
quote:4 games left in the month. Does he drop 80 points in that time frame? He would have to go 0 for his next 7. There are 6 games left in the month so good chance he gets that many ABs. 5 SEC games and 1 OOC.
He might get thru March at .240 but the SEC is going to tear him up.
Popular
Back to top
