- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:29 am to LSU91MBA
quote:
Leave the . . .
quote:Here's what's dumb: A dummy reads a post, apparently does not understand it, incorrectly restates it, then calls the original poster "dumb".
Dumb, just dumb.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:29 am to LaPride55
Posted this yesterday on SEC Rant. Here is my "analysis."
Standing: You would have standing as a ticket holder. My ticket says "SEC" on in it in big old letters. I bought it in reliance that there would be noncorrupt officiating.
12(b)(6): File in state court under state law. Making it nonremovable will be a breeze (for reasons already discussed). Ain't no Iqbal in Louisiana, so the initial scrutiny under our fact pleading system will be minimal.
Injunction: You are not seeking an injunction. You are seeking the splash and the discovery. Keep the claim under 50k and it is a bench trial. Louisiana has issue preclusion, and other states would have to give the findings full faith and credit. So a judge so inclined could hit the SEC with a huge lick in a small case.
I am NOT saying this is a good idea. I am saying that a shrewd plaintiffs' attorney already spending millions on TV time to build brand could make a hell of a splash for a tiny investment. And it would not be the worst idea for that attorney.
Standing: You would have standing as a ticket holder. My ticket says "SEC" on in it in big old letters. I bought it in reliance that there would be noncorrupt officiating.
12(b)(6): File in state court under state law. Making it nonremovable will be a breeze (for reasons already discussed). Ain't no Iqbal in Louisiana, so the initial scrutiny under our fact pleading system will be minimal.
Injunction: You are not seeking an injunction. You are seeking the splash and the discovery. Keep the claim under 50k and it is a bench trial. Louisiana has issue preclusion, and other states would have to give the findings full faith and credit. So a judge so inclined could hit the SEC with a huge lick in a small case.
I am NOT saying this is a good idea. I am saying that a shrewd plaintiffs' attorney already spending millions on TV time to build brand could make a hell of a splash for a tiny investment. And it would not be the worst idea for that attorney.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:35 am to JudgeHolden
Looking for a friendly judge? Judge Jamie Bice in Lake Charles played for LSU in the late 80s. Very active in he L club. But he is probably too ethical not to recuse himself.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:36 am to BR Tiger
It would be hard to get venue in Lake Charles. You could in BR, though.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:39 am to JudgeHolden
I was kidding. I don’t think a fan filing suit is a worthwhile endeavor. It isn’t going anywhere. Change will have to come from the member schools.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:41 am to BR Tiger
quote:
I was kidding. I don’t think a fan filing suit is a worthwhile endeavor. It isn’t going anywhere. Change will have to come from the member schools.
I know.
But why wouldn't Gordon or Spencer want to do it for the publicity?
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:46 am to LaPride55
quote:
There is no way the majority of the other SEC schools do not feel the same way
Out you haven't heard??? All the "smart" guys with the "real" inside scoop will tell you all about how those schools are in on it too. They all get paid by the SEC to stay silent and out of Bamas way.
Some of the people on this board are total nut jobs.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 9:59 am to LaPride55
I would like an investigation similar to Mueller’s. There is no rational basis for the decisions made by the SEC on the same day.
The circumstantial evidence is strong.
The circumstantial evidence is strong.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 10:00 am to LaPride55
this is lunacy. you're a psycho
Posted on 10/23/18 at 10:01 am to I-H8-BAMA
quote:
Elite high school recruits WANT to play in the SEC.
34 of last years top 50 recruits signed with non-SEC programs. Bama and Georgia signed the lions's share of the other 16 - because they are NC contenders, not because they are SEC programs.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 10:02 am to iamandykeim
quote:
iamandykeim
Posted on 10/23/18 at 10:03 am to LSU82BILL
quote:Correct!
because they are NC contenders, not because they are SEC programs.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 10:03 am to LaPride55
Grandstanding is Carville's M.O.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 11:57 am to NC_Tigah
"Engage in talks with the Big 12 and ACC"....
about what? "Bama's unfair advantage".
If I "misinterpreted", well, do a better job of explaining what the hell you're talking about.
about what? "Bama's unfair advantage".
If I "misinterpreted", well, do a better job of explaining what the hell you're talking about.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 12:03 pm to releauxded2469
I think we should add them to the digital billboards
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News