- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SMU is a good win
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:05 am to GeorgeWest
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:05 am to GeorgeWest
I agree and McMahon I believe can evaluate and develop talent with the best of them.
Just this year Nwoko has exceeded expectations and Thomas and Sutton have met them. The freshmen (including Zipper) all look promising outside of Gilhool, who we haven't seen.
Just this year Nwoko has exceeded expectations and Thomas and Sutton have met them. The freshmen (including Zipper) all look promising outside of Gilhool, who we haven't seen.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:26 am to jamarr
Mackinnon was in a zone from distance Saturday, but other games he put down enough bricks from the arc to build the Pitti Palace.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:20 pm to tarzana
Mckinnon is shooting 45% from 3. So those 2 bad games were more of an anomaly than they were of his potential. What's wild is Zipper is shooting 44% but barely sees the court. Not sure what his shortcomings are but he can't be any worse on defense than Mckinnon and if we have noone hitting from 3 why not give him a shot.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:06 pm to mcspufftiger7
quote:
Mckinnon is shooting 45% from 3. So those 2 bad games were more of an anomaly than they were of his potential.
He is shooting 45%. But that's been the byproduct of an inconsistent "all or nothing" approach. He hasn't just had two bad games. In half of LSU games this year he's shot 0% from 3. Vs. UNO, FIU and Alcorn he was a combined 0-8. He was 0-3 vs. Drake and 0-5 vs. Texas Tech.
Then he has games where he almost can't miss. 4-5 vs. Tarleton St., 6-8 vs. Omaha, 3-4 vs. DePaul, 6-7 vs. SMU.
That's what the post is referencing. This year he's either been on fire or he can't hit anything, without much middle ground. That's worrisome because once you get beyond the games McKinnon is red hot, LSU's 3 point shooting falls off a cliff. Of the guys averaging 10 or more mpg, Sutton is shooting 30%. King is 25%, Thomas is 24%, Reece is 11%. Tamba and Nwoko are literally no threat from deep. Those trends are unlikely to significantly improve once the level of competition jumps up nightly in SEC play.
McMahon is going to have to be able to read his team, recognize pretty quickly the nights McKinnon isn't shooting well from deep, and adjust the approach on the fly. LSU, thus far has been really good from two, and really good from the FT line (best in the SEC right now). That means some games may have to turn into a rock fight where the approach is to try to get inside and either get shot on the rim for a make or offensive rebound, or to get to the FT line a ton. LSU was getting to the FT line a lot early on, but in the last 4 games that's started to decrease significantly.
Basketball is a game of constant adjustments. What is working for 5-6 possessions may suddenly be shut down and the coach has to adjust accordingly. IMO, that has been the single biggest flaw in McMahon's in-game coaching. He either doesn't or is hesitant to adjust the approach. Sometimes the tempo is slow and you have to try to speed it up by doing things differently defensively. Sometimes you have to slow down the tempo. Some night the shots are falling and it benefits you to speed up offensively to attempt a lot of FGs. Sometimes you can't hit anything from deep and you have to try to make it a FT shooting contest. THAT is where coaching comes in.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:33 pm to Alt26
quote:
MO, that has been the single biggest flaw in McMahon's in-game coaching. He either doesn't or is hesitant to adjust the approach.
I don't think that's an unreasonable take, I do think he is often slow or hesitant to adjust properly when teams adjust to us. Some would say that's because he has not had the talent to? I would say to that - maybe some of it is that, but not totally.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 5:36 pm to Alt26
This team is very vulnerable, because it is easy to make it very hard to get shots off if your team only has one good 3pt shooter. Sutton is a career 25% shooter, and this is his best year so far, so I don’t expect that to improve. Thomas is a career 34% shooting, and this is by far his worst year, which has brought his career average down. He shot 35 and 36% in other seasons. If he returns to his average, we’ll be much harder to defend. The only other good healthy 3pt shooters seem to be Carter, Zipper, and Mosley. I was looking at their BPRs, and the best of that group is Zipper, but all 3 are negative. Zipper’s BPR is much better than King’s, so it seems to justify more playing time for Zipper. Max has the 3rd best BPR behind Thomas and Nwoko, with Tampa 4th and Sutton 5th, so that supports them starting, but Zipper is a wild card, because he seems less lost every successive time I see him play. If he can figure out the American game, his BPR should improve even more, and he may be our ace when Max goes cold.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:42 pm to Lapaz
May be something to that. I just figured playing in the SEC would be a step down from Israeli pro league but maybe the game is much different there. He has looked good last couple of times he’s gotten in . He even ran a high pick and roll and alley ooped to Nwoko for a slam in a game. And his shot looks really smooth. Hoping he continues to get better because he could become the missing piece we need as the other 3 point shooter.
Popular
Back to top

0




