- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SMU is a good win
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:13 am to tigerbait2010
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:13 am to tigerbait2010
No I can't provide proof other than what I was told by someone I trust that is involved in NIL player mgt. And other reports that said LSU and SC were at the bottom of the SEC in NIL spending and just coincidently had the 2 worst records in the SEC.I do think this year speaks for itself. It's not just a coincidence that the year LSU announces they are going to incentivize the basketball NIL that they have their most talented team with an SEC caliber PG. And yes TT skullfricked us the first half but LSU played evenly with them in the 2nd half but still couldn't hit 3's so they weren't able to make a dent in the deficit. TT finally reverted back to normal shooting % and LSU held a prospective POY and 1st round draft choice to 11 points. As a coach you use that 2nd half to motivate your team for SMU and that's what he did. I believe if we played TT again it wouldn't look the same . Not saying we win but I think it would be more competitive. Like Woody hayes said "There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you."
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:17 am to lsudave1
quote:
You are not actually required to freak out and try to defend McMahon at every waking moment of the basketball season.
Well in his defense, the Will Wade knob gobblers shite on McMahon every waking moment of the basketball season. If you can’t take the heat Nancy, stay out of the kitchen.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:24 am to mcspufftiger7
Sure. That’s fine. But people shouldn’t be surprised no one cares until we get more results.
The schedule is pathetic until conference play. We’ve also seen promise in the OOC under McMahon previously.
I just can’t imagine someone being hardline on either side of this topic. It’s pretty foolish to think we are a tournament team with McMahon’s past, but I understand the NIL argument. Just wait and see at this point.
The schedule is pathetic until conference play. We’ve also seen promise in the OOC under McMahon previously.
I just can’t imagine someone being hardline on either side of this topic. It’s pretty foolish to think we are a tournament team with McMahon’s past, but I understand the NIL argument. Just wait and see at this point.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:25 am to mcspufftiger7
quote:
Never said he shouldn't be criticized when warranted but it's also about the players and if you are at the bottom of the NIL for 3 years that is what you are going to get. He competed with crap last year. Not even an SEC caliber PG. So no he doesn't suck as a coach. Is he better than Wade? At this point no but Wade was getting his players because they were getting paid before NIL was legal. Got no problem with that as the other programs were too. he just got caught. The problem is the Wade sycophants wanted Woodward to be so wrong about letting Wade go that they rooted for Mcmahon to lose so they could be right. That's pretty much it. There were guys that wanted him fired after his first season.LOL. Idiots. he may not end up working out but let's at least see how he does on a more level playing field this year
This is where you lose people. On the one had saying McMahon is not above criticism. Then on the other hand suggesting the poor results are the fault of everyone and everything else but McMahon.
Also, it noteworthy that NO ONE else in the thread brought up Wade...except you...unsolicited. I think that illustrates the reality that the ardent support for a coach with such a poor record is not really based in a real belief in the coach, but rather a desperate hope for validation that the "new guy" will be better than the old coach who was well liked. Like some strange longing to prove those who think McMahon has done a poor job wrong. Even when then manner in which EVERY coach is ultimately judged, his W/L record, says otherwise. Almost like a doting mother who can't bear to hear anything negative about her child and bristles at any criticism...no matter how logical it may be.
It was inevitable McMahon was going to be compared to Wade. That's human nature. And it's not isolated to LSU basketball, or even LSU in general. Les was compared to Saban every step of the way until he won a championship in 2007. Smoke had to live in Skip's shadow his entire tenure. Kalen DeBoer at Alabama has had two good seasons at Alabama relative to the rest of the country. But for their fanbase he's in Saban's shadow until and unless he wins a championship...if not multiple.
Wade, like Skip and Saban, is unique in that he was one of the few HCs in the last several decades that left the job "against the wishes" of the fanbase. That naturally was going to create basis for comparison. So being angry that it exists is arguing that human nature should be ignored. A guy who follows a successful, well-liked person is going to be judged more harshly. That's life!
A collection of white knights defending McMahon at every moderate achievement isn't effective in changing opinions. It's mostly just annoying which often times creates a visceral opposite reaction. He simply has to consistently win. Unless and until that becomes the norm, he's not going to get the benefit of the doubt from the fanbase. Even after what was a good win the other night over SMU.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:42 am to mcspufftiger7
I got roasted by both the McMen and the anti MM crowd for saying this “The SMU game is a much better benchmark for this team than the Texas Tech game”. The McMen team thought we would be able to put up a fight against them and the anti team thought that if you lose that means we are a bad team. The truth is there was no world where we would be competitive against Tech unless they turned out to be frauds… spoiler alert they aren’t.
SMU is a consistent bubble watch team, and if we can (we did) beat them that would show progress in our team. I think SMU would be roughly .500 in our conference so it gives me hope that we can have a winning conference record this year. I guess we will see. I am more interested in what Verge will do if McMahon goes 10-8 or 11-7.
SMU is a consistent bubble watch team, and if we can (we did) beat them that would show progress in our team. I think SMU would be roughly .500 in our conference so it gives me hope that we can have a winning conference record this year. I guess we will see. I am more interested in what Verge will do if McMahon goes 10-8 or 11-7.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:44 am to Stuckinthe90s
10-8 would get LSU into the tournament, so McMahon absolutely comes back
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:47 am to Alt26
Excellent post. I have been way quieter about scrutinizing McMahon until we play a few conference games, but finger wagging because we beat SMU is fricking pathetic. 
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:54 am to mcspufftiger7
STFU....same type of fans thought Clemson was a HUGE season opener win in football. Turns out they suck bad......and so does LSU
Same with SMU freaking basketball. Give me a break and let the season play out
Same with SMU freaking basketball. Give me a break and let the season play out
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:55 am to lsudave1
quote:
You are not actually required to freak out and try to defend McMahon at every waking moment of the basketball season.
No one is "required" to trash him, or talk about Will Wade still, but here we are.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:55 am to mcspufftiger7
Big Regualr Season Wins:
LSU defeats eventual national champion and #5 UNLV 1990
LSU beats #2 Georgetown 1989
LSU defeats #2 Arizona 1990
LSU defeats #1 Arizona 2002
LSU beats #5 Tennessee 2019
And now we can add
LSU defeats unranked SMU 2025
LSU defeats eventual national champion and #5 UNLV 1990
LSU beats #2 Georgetown 1989
LSU defeats #2 Arizona 1990
LSU defeats #1 Arizona 2002
LSU beats #5 Tennessee 2019
And now we can add
LSU defeats unranked SMU 2025
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:58 am to LSUTigerFan1996
“will always root for LSU, regardless of the coach. SMU was a great win. But also, don’t go into hiding if McMahon gets smoked in the SEC again. That being said, I hope he doesn’t. If he does, LSU needs to go in a different direction“
It’s that simple. We’ll see about half way through the conference schedule. We still have some Pretty good players. No elites.
It’s that simple. We’ll see about half way through the conference schedule. We still have some Pretty good players. No elites.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:59 am to Choupique19
Pirate bottom downvoting every post I see.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:02 pm to mcspufftiger7
I don’t believe MacKinnon will shoot like that consistently. It would be great if he did because he’d probably make All American. That being said his shooting was a major reason we won that game. So what happens when he comes back down to Earth?
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:04 pm to tigerbait2010
You cannot mention the mentally unstable Mchaters without mentioning Wade because it is the basis for everything. They were so pissed off at Woodward that they WANTED Mcmahon to fail so they could lay the blame at the feet of Woodward. They wanted MM fired after his first year! LOL. And they live in this fantasy world that Wade is coming back. There may have been a window but that is gone. And you can criticize Mcmahon on coaching but if you don't take into account the NIL situation then you are not being objective. $$ absolutely is a key piece to this puzzle now. And that is why I choose to judge him harder this year. I'm not finger wagging about the SMU win.Just said it's a good win. Period. Doesn't say anything about where we end up in the SEC but if you know anything about basketball then you know having a competent PG is a huge start and will make us more competitive.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:04 pm to theliontamer
(We are a football and baseball school, thanks)
Apparently by the financials one poster posted we are a football and basketball school. The only ones that made money. Couldn’t believe it when I read it.
And fricking track should be disbanded. Always a disappointment. 7 million a yr. In the hole shite we could get the best QB in the country with that.
Apparently by the financials one poster posted we are a football and basketball school. The only ones that made money. Couldn’t believe it when I read it.
And fricking track should be disbanded. Always a disappointment. 7 million a yr. In the hole shite we could get the best QB in the country with that.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:08 pm to mcspufftiger7
stop defending McMahon. Period. His results speak for themselves. Once we get into SEC play, he will verify to all the fans that he is not an SEC caliber coach. He will be fired, and we will move on. Stop sucking his dick every time he does something good. The expectation here is championships, not mediocrity.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:12 pm to mcspufftiger7
quote:
fantasy world that Wade is coming back
it's more real than you know, I am speaking from a place of good inside knowledge of the situation. Wade wants to come back to LSU. That said, I do not actively root for LSU to lose, never have never will. If MM gets fired ( which is likely) then I would hope we get WW back at all costs.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:15 pm to tigerbait2010
The 1st.qt. Killed us.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:20 pm to GeauxTime9
Who actually really knows how much these kids are making. I think it’s all just word of mouth. I would love to know how much EVERYONE is paying. Would be fascinating.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 12:35 pm to mcspufftiger7
I’m confused why you think anything has changed?
McMahon has done nothing to earn the benefit of the doubt. He had big wins before that ultimately meant nothing once SEC play started.
McMahon has done nothing to earn the benefit of the doubt. He had big wins before that ultimately meant nothing once SEC play started.
Popular
Back to top


2




